13 research outputs found
Recovery kinetics of knee flexor and extensor strength after a football match
© 2015 The Authors. Published by PLOS. This is an open access article available under a Creative Commons licence.
The published version can be accessed at the following link on the publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128072We examined the temporal changes of isokinetic strength performance of knee flexor (KF) and extensor (KE) strength after a football match. Players were randomly assigned to a control (N = 14, participated only in measurements and practices) or an experimental group (N = 20, participated also in a football match). Participants trained daily during the two days after the match. Match and training overload was monitored with GPS devices. Venous blood was sampled and muscle damage was assessed pre-match, post-match and at 12h, 36h and 60h post-match. Isometric strength as well as eccentric and concentric peak torque of knee flexors and extensors in both limbs (dominant and non-dominant) were measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at baseline and at 12h, 36h and 60h after the match. Functional (KFecc/KEcon) and conventional (KFcon/KEcon) ratios were then calculated. Only eccentric peak torque of knee flexors declined at 60h after the match in the control group. In the experimental group: a) isometric strength of knee extensors and knee flexors declined (P<0.05) at 12h (both limbs) and 36h (dominant limb only), b) eccentric and concentric peak torque of knee extensors and flexors declined (P<0.05) in both limbs for 36h at 60°/s and for 60h at 180°/s with eccentric peak torque of knee flexors demonstrating a greater (P<0.05) reduction than concentric peak torque, c) strength deterioration was greater (P<0.05) at 180°/s and in dominant limb, d) the functional ratio was more sensitive to match-induced fatigue demonstrating a more prolonged decline. Discriminant and regression analysis revealed that strength deterioration and recovery may be related to the amount of eccentric actions performed during the match and athletes' football-specific conditioning. Our data suggest that recovery kinetics of knee flexor and extensor strength after a football match demonstrate strength, limb and velocity specificity and may depend on match physical overload and players' physical conditioning level.Published versio
Discrimination of players of the experimental group into a high- and low-performer subgroup based on physical activity variables indicative of match's external load as derived from cluster and discriminant analysis.
<p><sup>1</sup> Within-groups correlations between discriminating variables and standardized canonical discriminant functions.</p><p>Discrimination of players of the experimental group into a high- and low-performer subgroup based on physical activity variables indicative of match's external load as derived from cluster and discriminant analysis.</p
Changes of strength performance of knee extensors in response to a football match.
<p>h, hours; <sup>1</sup>Significant difference with baseline; <sup>2</sup>significant difference between groups; <sup>3</sup>significant difference between dominant and non-dominant limb at corresponding time; <sup>4</sup>greater decline in functional ration compared to conventional ratio at corresponding time;<sup>5</sup>greater decline at 180°/s compared to that at 60°/s at corresponding time.</p
The physiological profile of the football match.
<p><sup>1</sup>Significant difference with baseline</p><p><sup>2</sup>significant difference between groups</p><p>N/A, not applicable.</p><p>The physiological profile of the football match.</p
Changes of soreness (A-B), CK activity (C) and leukocyte counts (D) following a football match.
<p>MS, muscle soreness; CK, creatine kinase activity; h, hours; C, control group; EG, experimental group; KE-C, knee extensors of control group; KE-EG, knee extensors of experimental group; KF-C, knee flexors of control group; KF-EG, knee flexors of experimental group; <sup>1</sup>Significant difference with baseline; <sup>2</sup>significant difference between groups; <sup>3</sup>significant difference between dominant and non-dominant limb at corresponding time; <sup>4</sup>greater decline in functional ration compared to conventional ratio at corresponding time;<sup>5</sup>greater decline at 180°/s compared to that at 60°/s at corresponding time.</p
Physical activity data obtained during practice by GPS and heart rate monitoring.
<p><sup>1</sup> Denotes a significant difference with practice 1 at P<0.05; <sup>2</sup> Denotes a significant difference with practice 2 at P<0.05; GPS, global positioning system; C, control group; EG, experimental group.</p><p>Physical activity data obtained during practice by GPS and heart rate monitoring.</p
The experimental flowchart.
<p>MAP, measurement of activity (football) profile; HR, heart rate; Pre, measurements before the match; Post, measurements immediately after the match; black arrow, indicates time of measuement.</p
GPS-measured activity profile of the experimental group during the football match.
<p>GPS, global positioning system.</p><p>GPS-measured activity profile of the experimental group during the football match.</p
Changes of strength performance of knee flexors in response to a football match.
<p>h, hours; <sup>1</sup>Significant difference with baseline; <sup>2</sup>significant difference between groups; <sup>3</sup>significant difference between dominant and non-dominant limb at corresponding time; <sup>4</sup>greater decline in functional ration compared to conventional ratio at corresponding time;<sup>5</sup>greater decline at 180°/s compared to that at 60°/s at corresponding time.</p
Stepwise linear regression model summary for each component predictors.
<p>Stepwise linear regression model summary for each component predictors.</p