Análise dos registros de leishmaniose visceral pelo método de captura-recaptura

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the number of cases, deaths, incidence and fatality rate due to visceral leishmaniasis, and to estimate its underreporting, as well as the coverage of the national information systems. METHODS: Confirmed cases of visceral leishmaniasis were analyzed, based on the following systems: the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN - Information System on Disease Notification), the Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM - Mortality Information System) and the Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH - Hospital Information System), between 2002 and 2003. The variables utilized in relationship for pair identification were: patient's name, mother's name, date of birth, gender, city of residence, and mailing address. The capture-recapture method was applied to calculate the estimates, by means of the Chapman formula. RESULTS: The estimated underreporting of visceral leishmaniasis in the SINAN, in relation to the SIH and the SIM, was 42.2% and 45.0% respectively. The estimated underreporting of deaths was 53% and 46.5%, when compared to SINAN-deaths and SIH-deaths respectively. The estimated incidence was 2.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, from the comparison between the SINAN and the SIH, 70.5% higher than the one found when SINAN's data were the only ones utilized. Furthermore, when comparing data from SIM and SINAN-deaths, an estimated fatality rate of 8% was observed, representing an increase in 16% from the one initially registered in the SINAN-deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The results show high estimated underreporting of cases and deaths due to visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. The relationship between information systems and the capture-recapture method application enabled to know and improve the epidemiological estimates, making its utilization in health services feasible.OBJETIVO: Analisar o número de casos, óbitos, incidência e letalidade e estimar a subnotificação da leishmaniose visceral, bem como a cobertura dos sistemas nacionais de informações. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados casos confirmados de leishmaniose visceral com base nos sistemas: Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan), Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM) e Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH), nos anos de 2002 e 2003. As variáveis utilizadas no relacionamento para identificação dos pares foram: nome do paciente, nome da mãe, data de nascimento, sexo, município de residência e endereço. Para cálculo das estimativas aplicou-se a metodologia de captura-recaptura, utilizando a fórmula de Chapman. RESULTADOS: A subnotificação estimada para casos de leishmaniose visceral no Sinan, em relação ao SIH e SIM, foi 42,2% e 45,0%, respectivamente. A subnotificação estimada de óbitos no SIM foi 53,0% e 46,5%, quando comparada com Sinan-óbitos e SIH-óbitos, respectivamente. Comparando o Sinan e o SIH, a incidência estimada foi de 2,9 por 100.000 habitantes, 70,5% mais alta que a encontrada utilizando somente os dados do Sinan. Da comparação dos dados do SIM e Sinan-óbitos a letalidade estimada de 8%, representou um incremento de 16% da inicialmente registrada no Sinan-óbitos. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados mostram elevada subnotificação estimada de casos e óbitos de leishmaniose visceral no Brasil. O relacionamento dos sistemas de informações e aplicação do método captura-recaptura permitiram conhecer e melhorar as estimativas epidemiológicas, sendo factível sua utilização nos serviços de saúde

Análise dos registros de leishmaniose visceral pelo método de captura-recaptura Analysis of visceral leishmaniasis reports by the capture-recapture method

OBJETIVO: Analisar o número de casos, óbitos, incidência e letalidade e estimar a subnotificação da leishmaniose visceral, bem como a cobertura dos sistemas nacionais de informações. MÉTODOS: Foram analisados casos confirmados de leishmaniose visceral com base nos sistemas: Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (Sinan), Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM) e Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH), nos anos de 2002 e 2003. As variáveis utilizadas no relacionamento para identificação dos pares foram: nome do paciente, nome da mãe, data de nascimento, sexo, município de residência e endereço. Para cálculo das estimativas aplicou-se a metodologia de captura-recaptura, utilizando a fórmula de Chapman. RESULTADOS: A subnotificação estimada para casos de leishmaniose visceral no Sinan, em relação ao SIH e SIM, foi 42,2% e 45,0%, respectivamente. A subnotificação estimada de óbitos no SIM foi 53,0% e 46,5%, quando comparada com Sinan-óbitos e SIH-óbitos, respectivamente. Comparando o Sinan e o SIH, a incidência estimada foi de 2,9 por 100.000 habitantes, 70,5% mais alta que a encontrada utilizando somente os dados do Sinan. Da comparação dos dados do SIM e Sinan-óbitos a letalidade estimada de 8%, representou um incremento de 16% da inicialmente registrada no Sinan-óbitos. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados mostram elevada subnotificação estimada de casos e óbitos de leishmaniose visceral no Brasil. O relacionamento dos sistemas de informações e aplicação do método captura-recaptura permitiram conhecer e melhorar as estimativas epidemiológicas, sendo factível sua utilização nos serviços de saúde.<br>OBJECTIVE: To analyze the number of cases, deaths, incidence and fatality rate due to visceral leishmaniasis, and to estimate its underreporting, as well as the coverage of the national information systems. METHODS: Confirmed cases of visceral leishmaniasis were analyzed, based on the following systems: the Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN - Information System on Disease Notification), the Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM - Mortality Information System) and the Sistema de Informações Hospitalares (SIH - Hospital Information System), between 2002 and 2003. The variables utilized in relationship for pair identification were: patient's name, mother's name, date of birth, gender, city of residence, and mailing address. The capture-recapture method was applied to calculate the estimates, by means of the Chapman formula. RESULTS: The estimated underreporting of visceral leishmaniasis in the SINAN, in relation to the SIH and the SIM, was 42.2% and 45.0% respectively. The estimated underreporting of deaths was 53% and 46.5%, when compared to SINAN-deaths and SIH-deaths respectively. The estimated incidence was 2.9 per 100,000 inhabitants, from the comparison between the SINAN and the SIH, 70.5% higher than the one found when SINAN's data were the only ones utilized. Furthermore, when comparing data from SIM and SINAN-deaths, an estimated fatality rate of 8% was observed, representing an increase in 16% from the one initially registered in the SINAN-deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The results show high estimated underreporting of cases and deaths due to visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. The relationship between information systems and the capture-recapture method application enabled to know and improve the epidemiological estimates, making its utilization in health services feasible

Interventions for American Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review Update

<div><p>Introduction</p><p>Leishmaniasis is an important public health problem in the Americas. A Cochrane review published in 2009 analyzed 38 randomized controlled trials (RCT). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effects of therapeutic interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.</p><p>Methods</p><p>All studies were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Lilacs (2009 to July, 2012 respectively), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (6-2012) and references of identified publications. RCTs’ risk of bias was assessed.</p><p>Results</p><p>We identified 1865 references of interest; we finally included 10 new RCTs. The risk of bias scored low or unclear for most domains. Miltefosine was not significantly different from meglumine antimoniate in the complete cure rate at 6 months (4 RCT; 584 participants; ITT; RR: 1.12; 95%CI: 0.85 to 1.47; I2 78%). However a significant difference in the rate of complete cure favoring miltefosine at 6 months was found in L. panamensis and L. guyanensis (2 RCTs, 206 participants; ITT; RR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.02 to 1.46; I2 0%). One RCT found that meglumine antimoniate was superior to pentamidine in the rate of complete cure for L. braziliensis (80 participants, ITT; RR: 2.21; 95%CI: 1.41 to 3.49), while another RCT assessing L. guyanensis did not find any significant difference. Although meta-analysis of three studies found a significant difference in the rate of complete cure at 3 months favoring imiquimod versus placebo (134 participants; ITT; RR: 1.45; 95%CI: 1.12 to 1.88; I2 0%), no significant differences were found at 6 and 12 months. Thermotherapy and nitric oxide were not superior to meglumine antimoniate.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Therapeutic interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis are varied and should be decided according to the context. Since mucosal disease is the more neglected form of leishmaniasis a multicentric trial should be urgently considered.</p></div

Ensuring access to essential health products: Lessons from Colombia's leishmaniasis control and elimination initiative.

BackgroundThis paper identifies opportunities and challenges for leishmaniasis control and elimination in Colombia, emphasizing the role of pooled procurement of essential medicines and supplies. Colombia is among the countries most affected by leishmaniasis globally, and also faces the dual challenge of procuring critically needed medicines in the context of limited national resources. It recently renewed its commitment to the control and elimination of leishmaniasis under its 2022-2031 Public Health Plan (PDSP) through a comprehensive public health approach.Methodology/principal findingsThe methodology comprises a comprehensive literature review and key informant interviews with leishmaniasis experts from the Colombian national control program and PAHO/WHO, focusing on cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and visceral leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis is endemic throughout Colombia, with over 11 million people at risk, many of whom live in poverty-stricken, remote and isolated rural areas with limited access to health services. Leishmaniasis care, including medicines, is provided free of charge, but many barriers were nonetheless identified at environmental, population, and health system levels, including the supply of quality-assured medicines. Opportunities to alleviate these barriers were identified, including the support of the PAHO Strategic Fund. Within the context of the sustainable development goals and international leishmaniasis control and elimination targets, Colombian officials have established their own priorities, the highest of which is the reduction of deaths from visceral leishmaniasis.Conclusions/significanceThe elimination of leishmaniasis as a public health problem presents significant challenges, given its biological complexity and diversity, physical and clinical manifestations, social and economic impacts, frequently burdensome treatment regimens, and insufficient supply of necessary medicines. However, rigorous prevention and control efforts through strong political commitment and a highly motivated workforce can dramatically reduce its burden. Colombia's new PDSP, which highlights leishmaniasis control, is an opportunity for a revitalized health system response through committed leadership, intersectoral actions, and partnerships with international organizations that share a common vision

Leishmaniose visceral no Brasil:\ud evolução e desafios

The urbanization of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil has been related to environmental changes, migration, interaction and spread of sylvatic reservoirs and infected dogs to areas with no transmission, and adaptation of the vector Lutzomyia longipalpis to the peridomiciliary environment. From 1980 to 2005, Brazil recorded 59,129 cases of visceral leishmaniasis, 82.5% of which in the Northeast region. Visceral leishmaniasis gradually spread to other regions of the country: in 1998 these other regions reported 15% of all cases, but by 2005 this proportion had increased to 44%. From 1998 to 2005, indigenous cases were reported in 1,904 different municipalities of the country (34.2%). Reservoir and vector control pose major challenges for disease control, since there is a need for better knowledge of vector behavior in urban areas, and control activities involve high operational costs. In recent years the Brazilian Ministry of Health has supported research on the laboratory diagnosis of infection and disease in humans and dogs, treatment of patients, evaluation of the effectiveness of control strategies, and development of new technologies that could contribute to the surveillance and control of visceral leishmaniasis in the country.A urbanização da leishmaniose visceral tem sido relacionada\ud a modificações ambientais causadas por\ud ações antrópicas, pelo rápido processo migratório, pela\ud interação e mobilização de reservatórios silvestres\ud e cães infectados para áreas sem transmissão, e pela\ud adaptação do vetor Lutzomiya longipalpis ao peridomicílio.\ud Entre 1980 e 2005, o Brasil registrou 59.129\ud casos de leishmaniose visceral, sendo 82,5% na Região\ud Nordeste. Gradativamente, a leishmaniose visceral expandiu-\ud se para as regiões Centro-Oeste, Norte e Sudeste,\ud passando de 15% dos casos em 1998 para 44% em\ud 2005. Entre 1998 e 2005 foram registrados casos autóctones\ud em 1.904 (34,2%) diferentes municípios brasileiros.\ud O controle vetorial e de reservatórios representam\ud os maiores desafios para o controle da doença, dado\ud a necessidade de melhor conhecer o comportamento\ud do vetor no ambiente urbano, as dificuldades operacionais\ud e o alto custo de execução. Nos últimos anos, o\ud Ministério da Saúde tem investido em pesquisas sobre\ud diagnóstico laboratorial humano e canino, tratamento\ud dos pacientes, avaliação da efetividade das estratégias\ud de controle, bem como de novas tecnologias que\ud possam contribuir na implementação das ações de vigilância\ud e controle da leishmaniose visceral no Brasil