126 research outputs found

    Clinical relevance of heparin-PF4 complex antibody in DVT after total joint replacement

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor-4 (HPF-4) complex (HIT antibodies) have been observed in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). These antibodies are thought to be involved in thrombosis through activation of platelet/endothelial cells. This prospective study was conducted to determine the incidence of post-operative HIT antibodies to assess the associated risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We studied 104 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA (n = 44) and primary THA (n = 60) with short-duration prophylaxis (1–2 days of a fixed dose of unfractionated heparin). HIT antibodies were assayed using a sandwich-type ELISA before the operation and after heparin treatment (post-operative day 7).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In the clinical outcome, the incidence of symptomatic DVT was 15.4% (16/104, TKA; 10, THA 6) and pulmonary embolism (PE) was not observed. The total seroconversion rate of HIT antibodies at post-operative day 7 was 34.6% (36/104). Among 36 seroconverted patients, 11 (30.6%) developed symptomatic DVT and 5 out of 68 of the non-seroconverted patients (7.4%) developed symptomatic DVT. The incidence for DVT was significantly higher in the seroconverted patients compared with that of the non-seroconverted patients (odds ratio 5.5, 95%CI: 1.7–17.6 <it>p </it>= 0.0028). Furthermore, in the patients with symptomatic DVT, the titer of HIT antibodies at post-operative day 7 was significantly higher compared with those without symptomatic DVT.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our data therefore suggest that seroconversion for HIT antibodies generated by heparin is associated with a risk of DVT in patients undergoing total joint replacement.</p

    Complications related to deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: a systematic review of the literature

    Get PDF
    Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is essential to the appropriate management of multisystem trauma patients. Without thromboprophylaxis, the rate of venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism is substantial. Three prophylactic modalities are common: pharmacologic anticoagulation, mechanical compression devices, and inferior vena cava filtration. A systematic review was completed using PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the potential complications of DVT prophylactic options. Level one evidence currently supports the use of low molecular weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis in the trauma patient. Unfortunately, multiple techniques are not infrequently required for complex multisystem trauma patients. Each modality has potential complications. The risks of heparin include bleeding and heparin induced thrombocytopenia. Mechanical compression devices can result in local soft tissue injury, bleeding and patient non-compliance. Inferior vena cava filters migrate, cause inferior vena cava occlusion, and penetrate the vessel wall. While the use of these techniques can be life saving, they must be appropriately utilized

    Reflection on passive immunotherapy in those who need most: some novel strategic arguments for obtaining safer therapeutic plasma or autologous antibodies from recovered COVID -19 infected patients

    No full text
    The COVID-19 pandemic is an emerging new human disease, for which no vaccines, or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or drugs, are currently available for therapy. Active vaccination requires the induction of an immune response against a given agent in a susceptible individual for the pur- pose of preventing or treating an infectious disease and this usually takes time to develop. Thus, the use of existing autol- ogous Ab administration, obtainable from recovered COVID-19 patients two weeks after recovery, is the best and the most practical strategy for providing immediate passive immunity to susceptible recipients in need. Recently, the use of convalescent blood-derived products was proposed by one of the authors of this paper (JS) as an early option for treating patients with Ebola virus disease. In this mini-report we propose three potential additional options for sources of such autologous Ab and provide some operational and evidence-based arguments to support the urgent implementation of such strategic approaches to saving the lives of those in need: (i) the use of hyperimmune immunoglobulin concentrates, which are derived from the plasma of physiologically immunized donors. It is debatable that this method may be even more effective than plasma- pheresis since it uses a smaller dose of about 200 ml, which causes higher donor variability compared to the product of plasmapheresis which provides 600 ml that can be used as a triplet of satellite bags for three recipients
    • 

    corecore