Day-90 survival in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 and hydroxychloroquine: a propensity analysis

International audienceBACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of hydroxychloroquine on medium term outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring intensive care. We aimed to evaluate the effects of hydroxychloroquine on day 90 mortality in this specific population. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter, propensity matched cohort analysis, used data of adult patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 admitted to 3 university affiliated intensive care units between March 7, 2020, to April 7, 2020 in Lyon, France. Patients received either hydroxychloroquine (loading dose of 400 mg twice daily at day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily from day 2 to day 10) or standard of care without hydroxychloroquine. We compared all-cause mortality at day-90 after ICU admission between propensity score matched groups receiving hydroxychloroquine or standard of care. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included with a day-28 and day-90 mortality rate of 23.6% and 32.5%, respectively. The median (interquartile) age was 67 years (56-76 years), 105 (66.9%) were men, 65 (41.4%) fulfilled criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 64 (41%) received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for 10 days (4-10 days). In the propensity score matched cohort (59 patients in each group), day-90 mortality was 35.6% for patients who received HCQ and 23.7% for patients who did not (P=0.23). Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant association between HCQ therapy and mortality (P=0.20 by log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, off-label use of HCQ in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with any significant change in medium-term prognosis, confirming results of studies in less severe patients

Impact of health information systems on hospital bed occupancy rates in French hospitals: results from the e-SI (PREPS-SIPS) study

Présenté par Lionel PerrierInternational audienc

Importance of infarct size versus other variables for clinical outcomes after PPCI in STEMI patients

Despite promising experimental studies and encouraging proof-of-concept clinical trials, interventions aimed at limiting infarct size have failed to improve clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our objective was to examine whether variables (cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, post-procedural variables, cotreatments) might be associated with clinical outcomes in STEMI patients independently from infarct size reduction. The present study was based on a post hoc analysis of the CIRCUS trial database (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01502774) that assessed the clinical benefit of a single intravenous bolus of cyclosporine in 969 patients with anterior STEMI. Since cyclosporine had no detectable effect on clinical outcomes as well as on any measured variable, we here considered the whole study population as one group. Multivariate analysis was performed to address the respective weight of infarct size and variables in clinical outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that several variables (including gender, hypertension, renal dysfunction, TIMI flow grade post-PCI \textless 3, and treatment administered after PCI with betablockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) had per se a significant influence on the occurrence of [death or hospitalization for heart failure] at 1 year. The relative weight of infarct size and variables on the composite endpoint of [death or hospitalization for heart failure] at 1 year was 18% and 82%, respectively. Several variables contribute strongly to the clinical outcomes of STEMI patients suggesting that cardioprotective strategy might not only focus on infarct size reduction

Impact of Collateral Status on Neuroprotective Effect of Cyclosporine A in Acute Ischemic Stroke

International audienc

Neprilysin levels at the acute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction

International audienceBackground Several preliminary analyses suggested an association between neprilysin (NEP) levels and myocardial infarction. Hypothesis The objective was to assess whether NEP plasma levels following reperfusion might be a surrogate for infarct size (IS) or predict adverse outcomes in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Methods We measured NEP levels in a prospective cohort of 203 patients with STEMI referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulating soluble NEP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at admission (t0) and 4 hours later (t4) following reperfusion and on 7 times points (t0, t4, t12, t24, t48, day 7 and day 30) in a subset of 21 patients. IS and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured at 1 month by cardiac magnetic resonance. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes were collected at 12-month follow-up. Results Median t0 and t4 NEP levels in 203 patients were respectively 88.3 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] [14; 375.4]) and 101.5 pg/mL (IQR [18.5; 423.8]). These levels remained unchanged over 1 month (P = 0.70). NEP levels did not correlate significantly with IS (P = 0.51) or LVEF (P = 0.34). There was no correlation between NEP and troponin, creatine kinase and interleukin-6 levels at h0 and h4. NEP levels above the median were not associated with adverse outcomes at follow-up (hazard ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval [0.69; 2.37]; P = 0.42). Conclusions NEP serum levels were widely distributed and did not change significantly in the first hours and 1-month period following reperfusion in STEMI patients. There was no significant relationship with markers of infarct size and inflammation, and 1-year adverse outcome

Lipid goal achievements after acute myocardial infarction: the gap between real-life and ESC 2019 guidelines

International audienceNo abstract availabl