31 research outputs found
Anything but a story foretold
Sugarcane and oil palm agribusinesses are in the vanguard of an emergent project of
agrarian capitalism in Guatemala, which is defined here as a financialized and flexible
type of agrarian extractivism. Meanwhile, Maya-Q´eqchi´ residents of the northern
lowlands believe that the changes in the labor regime, land relations and the agroecosystem
that the expansion of these agribusinesses has brought threaten their
subsistence in multiple and unfamiliar ways. Indeed, growing difficulties in dealing
with (vital) grievances is leading many, even those who initially welcomed the
corporate sugarcane and oil palm plantations, to transform their unrest into a practice
of resistance. Elaborating on what is presented here as a multiple politics perspective,
this contribution discusses the nature and character of such contemporary political
dynamics of agrarian change. The forms, strategies and practices of the two main and
most antagonistic repertoires of contention are explored here: the one in ‘defense of
territory’ and the one in the promotion of the ‘agrarian extractivist project’. The
tensions across and within multiple corporate, state and social actors who are pushing
for, resisting, complying with or operating at the most violent margins of the agrarian
extractivist project are also examined. By assessing continuities and ruptures between
current and previous cycles of contention around the control of land, water and other
natural resources, this paper stresses the often forgotten lesson about trajectories of
agrarian change not being a story foretold, but the product of multiple and dynamic
politics
The discursive flexibility of ‘flex crops’
‘Flex crops’ such as corn, oil palm and soy are understood to have multiple,
interchangeable uses; they have material flexibility. We propose that discursive
flexibility – the ability to strategically switch between discourses to promote an
objective – equally shapes the political economy of flex crops, and thereby patterns
of agrarian and environmental change. Comparing oil palm and Jatropha curcas, we
find that actors who cast oil palm as a multi-scale solution to food and energy
insecurity, climate change and (rural) poverty successfully reinforce its high material
flexibility. Jatropha’s proponents compensate for low material flexibility by
positioning the crop as a ‘sustainable’ energy source that achieves both global and
local goals. While this paper focuses on discourses that reinforce the oil palm and
jatropha projects, understanding the power of discursiv
The Rise of Agro-Extractive Capitalism : insights from Guatemala in the early 21st century
Research question:
_How does early 21st-century resource extractivism shape directions of agro-environmental change, and with what implications for whom?_
In this research, addressing this main research question involves dealing with two research subquestions:
_i) What are the social relations of production in the Guatemalan flex cane and palm complexes in the early 21st century?
ii) What are the politics of agro-environmental change in Guatemala during the convergent world crises conjuncture?
Inquiring into the political economy of oil palm as a global flex crop
Oil palm production and consumption, and the trade of its multiple commodities, have expanded exponentially in recent decades. This paper argues that this expansion will continue due to, and along with, the rise of ‘flexing’ among its increasing multiple uses, especially for more industrial and energy purposes. Oil palm has been extensively analysed in the context of land grabs and agrarian change, land conversion and deforestation. However, its nature as a flex crop remains unexplored, especially with respects to the convergence of global food, fuel and environmental crises. This paper provides a preliminary discussion of how oil palm fits in the flex-crop framework to analyse its enabling material and ideational bases, as well as who informs, decides and controls the nature of flexing. This is done through an analysis of the different roles played by state, corporate (private) and social actors in the flexing of oil palm across the globe. We conclude by drawing some implications for further research
Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability : an overview and conceptual framework
Unidad de excelencia MarÃa de Maeztu MdM-2015-0552Centre: ICTA Digital object identifier for the 'European Research Council' (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781) Digital object identifier for 'Horizon 2020' (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601).Can ecological distribution conflicts turn into forces for sustainability? This overview paper addresses in a systematic conceptual manner the question of why, through whom, how, and when conflicts over the use of the environment may take an active role in shaping transitions toward sustainability. It presents a conceptual framework that schematically maps out the linkages between (a) patterns of (unsustainable) social metabolism, (b) the emergence of ecological distribution conflicts, (c) the rise of environmental justice movements, and (d) their potential contributions for sustainability transitions. The ways how these four processes can influence each other are multi-faceted and often not a foretold story. Yet, ecological distribution conflicts can have an important role for sustainability, because they relentlessly bring to light conflicting values over the environment as well as unsustainable resource uses affecting people and the planet. Environmental justice movements, born out of such conflicts, become key actors in politicizing such unsustainable resource uses, but moreover, they take sometimes also radical actions to stop them. By drawing on creative forms of mobilizations and diverse repertoires of action to effectively reduce unsustainabilities, they can turn from 'victims' of environmental injustices into 'warriors' for sustainability. But when will improvements in sustainability be lasting? By looking at the overall dynamics between the four processes, we aim to foster a more systematic understanding of the dynamics and roles of ecological distribution conflicts within sustainability processes