58 research outputs found

    Broadening the Impact and Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Curricula for Introductory Statistics

    Get PDF
    The demands for a statistically literate society are increasing, and the introductory statistics course “Stat 101” remains the primary venue for learning statistics for the majority of high school and undergraduate students. After three decades of very fruitful activity in the areas of pedagogy and assessment, but with comparatively little pressure for rethinking the content of this course, the statistics education community has recently turned its attention to focusing on simulation-based methods, including bootstrapping and permutation tests, to illustrate core concepts of statistical inference within the context of the overall statistical investigative process. This new focus presents an opportunity to address documented shortcomings in the standard Stat 101 course (e.g., seeing the big picture; improving statistical thinking over mere knowledge of procedures). Our group has developed and implemented one of the first cohesive curricula that (a) emphasizes the core logic of inference using simulation-based methods in an intuitive, cyclical, active-learning pedagogy, and (b) emphasizes the overall process of statistical investigations, from asking questions and collecting data through making inferences and drawing conclusions. Improved conceptual understanding and retention of inference and study design that had been observed when using early versions of the curriculum at a single institution, are now being evaluated at dozens of institutions across the country with thousands of students using the fully integrated, stand-alone version of the curriculum. Encouraging preliminary results continue to be observed. We are now leveraging the tremendous national momentum and excitement about the approach to greatly expand implementations of simulation-based curricula by offering workshops around the country to diverse sets of faculty, offering numerous online support structures including: a blog, freely available applets, free instructor materials, earning objective-based instructional videos, free instructor-focused training videos, a listserv, and peer-reviewed publications covering both rationale and assessment results. Many hundreds of instructors have been directly impacted by our workshops and hundreds more through access to the free online materials. We are also in the midst of valuating widespread transferability of the approach across diverse institutions, students, and learning environments and deepening our understanding of how students’ attitudes and conceptual understanding develop using this approach through an assessment project involving concept and attitude inventories with over 10,000 students across 200 different instructors

    Challenging the State of the Art in Post-Introductory Statistics: Preparation, Concepts, and Pedagogy

    Get PDF
    The demands for a statistically literate society are increasing, and the introductory statistics course ( Stat 101 ) remains the primary venue for learning statistics for the majority of high school and undergraduate students. After three decades of very fruitful activity in the areas of pedagogy and assessment, but with comparatively little pressure for rethinking the content of this course, the statistics education community has recently turned its attention to use of randomization-based methods to illustrate core concepts of statistical inference. This new focus not only presents an opportunity to address documented shortcomings in the standard Stat 101 course (for example, improving students’ reasoning about inference), but provides an impetus for re-thinking the timing of the introduction of multivariable statistical methods (for example, multiple regression and general linear models). Multivariable methods dominate modern statistical practice but are rarely seen in the introductory course. Instead these methods have been, traditionally, relegated to second courses in statistics for students with a background in calculus and linear algebra. Recently, curricula have been developed to bring multivariable content to students who have only taken a Stat 101 course. However, these courses tend to focus on models and model-building as an end in itself. We have developed a preliminary version of an integrated one to two semester curriculum which introduces students to the core-logic of statistical inference through randomization-methods, and then introduces students to approaches for protecting against confounding and variability through multivariable statistical design and analysis techniques. The course has been developed by putting primary emphasis on the development of students’ conceptual understanding in an intuitive, cyclical, active-learning pedagogy, while continuing to emphasize the overall process of statistical investigations, from asking questions and collecting data through making inferences and drawing conclusions. The curriculum successfully introduces introductory statistics students to multivariable techniques in their first or second course

    Quantitative Evidence for the Use of Simulation and Randomization in the Introductory Statistics Course

    Get PDF
    The use of simulation and randomization in the introductory statistics course is gaining popularity, but what evidence is there that these approaches are improving students’ conceptual understanding and attitudes as we hope? In this talk I will discuss evidence from early full-length versions of such a curriculum, covering issues such as (a) items and scales showing improved conceptual performance compared to traditional curriculum, (b) transferability of findings to different institutions, (c) retention of conceptual understanding post-course and (d) student attitudes. Along the way I will discuss a few areas in which students in both simulation/randomization courses and the traditional course still perform poorly on standardized assessments

    Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) College Report 2016

    Get PDF
    In 2005 the American Statistical Association (ASA) endorsed the Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) College Report. This report has had a profound impact on the teaching of introductory statistics in two- and four-year institutions, and the six recommendations put forward in the report have stood the test of time. Much has happened within the statistics education community and beyond in the intervening 10 years, making it critical to re-evaluate and update this important report. For readers who are unfamiliar with the original GAISE College Report or who are new to the statistics education community, the full version of the 2005 report can be found at http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GaiseCollege_full.pdf and a brief history of statistics education can be found in Appendix A of this new report. The revised GAISE College Report takes into account the many changes in the world of statistics education and statistical practice since 2005 and suggests a direction for the future of introductory statistics courses. Our work has been informed by outreach to the statistics education community and by reference to the statistics education literature

    Scaffolding Student Activities Outside of Class

    Get PDF
    In this presentation we explore strategies for helping students structure and gain full benefit from time spent on the course outside of lecture. Some ideas come from using technology to help scaffold student activities, as well as design of student investigations, lab assignments, and just-in-time assessment

    Televisions, Physicians, and Life Expectancy

    No full text
    This article, created by Allan Rossman of Dickinson College, describes a dataset on life expectancies, densities of people per television set, and densities of people per physician in various countries of the world. The example addresses correlation versus causation and data transformations. The author states that "the example has proven very useful for helping students to discover the fundamental principle that correlation does not imply causation.&quot
    • 

    corecore