Towards best practice : procedural characteristics and outcomes of nurse-led central venous catheter insertion

This thesis presents a series of six, discrete yet interrelated studies describing the role of specialist nurses in inserting central venous catheters. These studies suggest that appropriate training, credentialing and procedural volume are critical in determining procedural and patient outcomes and potentially more important than professional qualifications. These data are useful in articulating the role of advance practice nursing in promoting the quality and safety of patient care

Delirium in the intensive care unit and its importance in the post-operative context: A review

The burden of delirium in the intensive care setting is a global priority. Delirium affects up to 80% of patients in intensive care units; an episode of delirium is often distressing to patients and their families, and delirium in patients within, or outside of, the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is associated with poor outcomes. In the short term, such poor outcomes include longer stay in intensive care, longer hospital stay, increased risk of other hospital-acquired complications, and increased risk of hospital mortality. Longer term sequelae include cognitive impairment and functional dependency. While medical category of admission may be a risk factor for poor outcomes in critical care populations, outcomes for surgical ICU admissions are also poor, with dependency at hospital discharge exceeding 30% and increased risk of in-hospital mortality, particularly in vulnerable groups, with high-risk procedures, and resource-scarce settings. A practical approach to delirium prevention and management in the ICU setting is likely to require a multi-faceted approach. Given the good evidence for the prevention of delirium among older post-operative outside of the intensive care setting, simple non-pharmacological interventions should be effective among older adults post-operatively who are cared for in the intensive care setting. In response to this, the future ICU environment will have a range of organizational and distinct environmental characteristics that are directly targeted at preventing delirium

Readmission to intensive care: development of a nomogram for individualising risk

Background: Readmission to intensive care during the same hospital stay has been associated with a greater risk of in-hospital mortality and has been suggested as a marker ofquality of care. There is lack of published research attempting to develop clinical prediction tools that individualise the risk of readmission to the intensive care unit during the same hospital stay. Objective: To develop a prediction model using an inception cohort of patients surviving an initial ICU stay. Design, setting and participants: The study was conducted at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney. An inception cohort of 14 952 patients aged 15 years or more surviving an initial ICU stay and transferred to general wards in the study hospital between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2007 was used to develop the model. Binary logistic regression was used to develop the prediction model and anomogram was derived to individualise the risk of readmission to the ICU during the same hospital stay. Main outcome measure: Readmission to the ICU during the same hospital stay.Results: Among members of the study cohort there were 987 readmissions to ICU during the study period. Compared with patients not readmitted to the ICU, patients who were readmitted were more likely to have had ICU stays of at least 7 days (odds ratio [OR], 2.2 [95% CI, 1.85-2.56]); non-elective initial admission to the ICU (OR, 1.7[95% CI, 1.44-2.08]); and acute renal failure (OR, 1.6 [95%CI, 0.97-2.47]). Patients admitted to the ICU from the operating theatre or recovery ward had a lower risk of readmission to ICU than those admitted from general wards, the emergency department or other hospitals. The maximum error between observed frequencies and predicted probabilities of readmission to ICU was estimatedto be 3%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the final model was 0.66.Conclusion: We have developed a practical clinical tool toindividualise the risk of readmission to the ICU during the same hospital stay in patients who survive an initial episodeof intensive care

Elastomeric pump infusion failures caused by inadequate Luer lock connector engagement to needleless connectors

Needleless connectors are used widely across all types of vascular access devices and provide safe, needleless administration of intravenous fluids and medications. An analysis of patients from an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program is presented in which elastomeric pumps had failed to flow due to incomplete tightening of Luer lock needleless connections. An alert was issued to community nursing staff responsible for daily elastomeric pump changes to ensure that needleless connectors were properly checked for full tightening. The frequency of failure of flow events before and after the alert was reviewed. Force and torque profiles required to activate the internal mechanism of connectors were measured in the 4 most frequently used needleless connectors in the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy program. The degree of torque and force required to activate the different needleless connectors varied and was identified as a factor contributing to inadequate connection with the elastomeric pump and consequent failure of flow. Repeated feedback to nursing staff over the study period about the force and torque required for needleless connector flow activation resulted in a highly significant decrease in the rate of failure of flow events per elastomeric pump from a rate of 0.0147 events per elastomeric pump per year in the last 3 months of 2018 to 0.0003 in the first 6 months of 2020 (difference = 0.0144 [CI, 0.0097-0.02]; P < .0001)

The burden of peripheral intravenous catheters in older hospital inpatients : a national cross-sectional study part of the One Million Global Peripheral Intravenous Catheters Collaboration

Objectives: To investigate the burden of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) in older hospitalised patients. Methods: A cross-sectional prospective observational study (2014/2015) to describe the characteristics, indications and outcomes of PIVCs among patients aged ≥65 from 65 Australian hospitals. Results: Amongst 2179 individual PIVCs (in 2041 patients, mean age 77.6 years, 45% female, 58% in NSW), 43% were inserted by doctors and 74% used that day, meaning 25% were ‘idle’. Overall, 18% (393/2179) exhibited signs of PIVC-related complications. Most commonly exhibited PIVC-related complications were tenderness (4.1%) and local redness (1.8%). Nearly one in three (29.1%) dressings was soiled, loosened or had come off, and only 36.8% had the time and date documented on the dressing. Both infusing IV medications (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.28–2.38, p 84 years) was independently associated with lower likelihood of a high score (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54–0.94, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Given 1 in 5 PIVCs were identified with having complications, further research should focus on optimising PIVC use in older patients

Use of short peripheral intravenous catheters: characteristics, management, and outcomes worldwide

BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) use in health care is common worldwide. Failure of PIVCs is also common, resulting in premature removal and replacement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics, management practices, and outcomes of PIVCs internationally. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING/PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients from rural, regional, and metropolitan areas internationally. MEASUREMENTS: Hospital, device, and inserter characteristics were collected along with assessment of the catheter insertion site. PIVC use in different geographic regions was compared. RESULTS: We reviewed 40,620 PIVCs in 51 countries. PIVCs were used primarily for intravenous medication (n = 28,571, 70%) and predominantly inserted in general wards (n = 22,167, 55%). Two-thirds of all devices were placed in non-recommended sites such as the hand, wrist, or antecubital veins. Nurses inserted most PIVCs (n = 28,575, 71%); although there was wide regional variation (26% to 97%). The prevalence of idle PIVCs was 14% (n = 5,796). Overall, 10% (n = 4,204) of PIVCs were painful to the patient or otherwise symptomatic of phlebitis; a further 10% (n = 3,879) had signs of PIVC malfunction; and 21% of PIVC dressings were suboptimal (n = 8,507). Over one-third of PIVCs (n = 14,787, 36%) had no documented daily site assessment and half (n = 19,768, 49%) had no documented date and time of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that many PIVCs were placed in areas of "exion, were symptomatic or idle, had suboptimal dressings, or lacked adequate documentation. This suggests inconsistency between recommended management guidelines for PIVCs and current practice

Dressings and securement devices to prevent complications for peripheral arterial catheters

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To compare the effectiveness of dressings and securement devices for peripheral arterial catheters

Safety and efficacy of midline catheters versus peripheral intravenous catheters: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Background: Despite pervasive need for peripheral intravenous catheters, insertion is often difficult, and approximately two thirds fail prematurely. Midline catheters are an alternative long peripheral catheter, inserted in the upper arm, ideal for patients with difficult access. Aim: The aim of this study is to test feasibility of the protocol and compare the efficacy and safety of midline catheters to peripheral intravenous catheters. Design: A parallel-group, pilot randomized controlled trial of adult medical/surgical hospitalized patients, from a single Australian referral hospital. Methods: Participants with difficult vascular access (≤2 palpable veins) and/or anticipated ≥5 days of peripherally compatible intravenous therapy were recruited between May 2019 and March 2020. Participants were randomized to (1) peripheral intravenous catheter or (2) midline catheter. Primary feasibility outcome measured eligibility, recruitment, protocol adherence, retention and attrition. Primary clinical outcomes measured device insertion failure and post-insertion failure. Results: In total, n = 143 participants (71 peripheral intravenous catheters and 72 midline catheters) were recruited; n = 139 were analysed. Most feasibility criteria were met. Peripheral intravenous catheters had shorter functional dwell time, with higher incidence of post-insertion failure compared to midline catheters. Conclusion: Midline catheters appear to be superior for patients with difficult vascular access or receiving prolonged intravenous therapy; a large, multi-centre trial to confirm findings is feasible

The One Million Global Catheters PIVC worldwide prevalence study

It is estimated that approximately half the number of all patients admitted to hospital require the insertion of an intravenous cannula into a peripheral vein, for the administration of intravenous fluids, medications and blood products. It is the most common invasive clinical procedure performed in hospitals worldwide (Webster et al, 2008; Ahlqvist et al, 2010). The annual use of peripheral intravenous cannulas (PIVCs) in North America has been reported to be as many as 150–200million units. However, the estimated number of PIVCs used across greater Europe or other regions of the world is largely unknown (Maki et al, 2006; Zingg and Pittet, 2009)