8 research outputs found

    Can we predict which patients will evolve to chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy for cortical renal tumors?

    Get PDF
    Introduction: While some studies show that patients submitted to radical nephrectomy have a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD), some studies report that carefully selected living kidney donors do not present a higher risk for CKD. Here, we aim to study predictive factors of CKD after radical nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: Between January 2006 to January 2010, 107 patients submitted to radical nephrectomy for cortical renal tumors at our institution were enrolled in this study. Demographic data were recorded, modified Charlson-Romano Index was calculated, and creatinine clearance was estimated using abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation. Pathological characteristics, surgical access and surgical complications were also reviewed. The end-point of the current study was new onset estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 and less than 45 mL/minute/1.73 m(2). Results: Age, preoperative eGFR, Charlson-Romano Index and hypertension were predictive factors of renal function loss, when the end-point considered was eGFR lower than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2). Age and preoperative eGFR were predictive factors of renal function loss, when the end-point considered was eGFR lower than 45 mL/minute/1.73 m2. Moreover, each year older increased 1.1 times the risk of eGFR lower than 60 and 45 mL/minute/1.73 m(2). After multivariate logistic regression, only age remained as an independent predictive factor of eGFR loss. Conclusion: Age is an independent predictive factor of GFR loss for patients submitted to radical nephrectomy for cortical renal tumors

    Prostate cancer dedifferentiation following antiandrogen therapy: a morphological finding or an increased tumor aggressiveness?

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation in prostate cancer induces tumor volume regression but does not improve outcome of the patient. A possible explanation for this phenomenon could be an increase of the residual tumor aggressiveness brought about by antiandrogen therapy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the frequency of tumor dedifferentiation following androgen blockade in prostate cancer and to determine if the remaining tumor shows signs of increased aggressiveness. METHODS: Thirty patients bearing locally advanced prostate cancer (stages T2c - T3) were submitted to neoadjuvant anti-androgenic therapy during four months followed by radical prostatectomy. Gleason scores from biopsy and surgical specimens were compared. Furthermore, the cell proliferation index was evaluated by immunohistochemistry assay for PCNA, tests with strong nuclear staining were considered positive. The percentage of positive nuclei, counted in 500 cells, was determined in several categories of the Gleason score from surgical specimens. RESULTS: In 11(37%) surgical specimens the Gleason score was equal or lower than that found in the biopsy and in 19 (63%) the total score was higher in the surgical specimens (p0.05). The median of cell proliferation indexes was 9% for glandular or specimen confined tumors and was 17% for extraprostatic tumors (p 0,05). A mediana dos índices de proliferação celular foi de 9% para tumores confinados à glândula ou ao espécime e de 17% para os extraprostáticos (p<0,05). CONCLUSÃO: Piora do escore de Gleason ocorreu em cerca de dois terços dos pacientes submetidos a tratamento hormonal anti-androgênico. Entretanto, os índices de proliferação celular, medidos pelo PCNA, foram iguais para espécimes com diferentes escores de Gleason. É provável que o bloqueio hormonal neo-adjuvante produza uma piora morfológica da neoplasia, sem, contudo, gerar clones celulares mais agressivos.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)UNIFESPSciEL
    corecore