226 research outputs found

    Dermoscopy of Pitted Keratolysis

    Get PDF
    Irritated hyperhidrotic soles with multiple small pits are pathognomonic for pitted keratolysis (PK). Here we show the dermatoscopic view of typical pits that can ensure the diagnosis. PK is a plantar infection caused by Gram-positive bacteria, particularly Corynebacterium. Increases in skin surface pH, hyperhidrosis, and prolonged occlusion allow these bacteria to proliferate. The diagnosis is fundamentally clinical and treatment generally consists of a combination of hygienic measures, correcting plantar hyperhidrosis and topical antimicrobials

    Skin Detachment and Regrowth in Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

    Get PDF
    Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a rare but clinically well-described dermatological pathology. However, clinical pictures of this disorder in text books do not reflect its dynamic evolution. Usually, the desquamative post-bullous stage is represented, neglecting the initial bullous stage as well as the skin healing. With one clinical case, we provide a day-after-day illustration of the evolution of a patient suffering from toxic epidermal necrolysis. During one month, a skin area of a limb was regularly photo-documented

    A Report of Two Cases of Solid Facial Edema in Acne

    Get PDF
    Solid facial edema (SFE) is a rare complication of acne vulgaris. To examine the clinical features of acne patients with solid facial edema, and to give an overview on the outcome of previous topical and systemic treatments in the cases so far published.; We report two cases from Switzerland, both young men with initially papulopustular acne resistant to topical retinoids.; Both cases responded to oral isotretinoin, in one case combined with oral steroids. Our cases show a strikingly similar clinical appearance to the cases described by Connelly and Winkelmann in 1985 (Connelly MG, Winkelmann RK. Solid facial edema as a complication of acne vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1985;121(1):87), as well as to cases of Morbihan's disease that occurs as a rare complication of rosacea.; Even 30 years after, the cause of the edema remains unknown. In two of the original four cases, a potential triggering factor was identified such as facial trauma or insect bites; however, our two patients did not report such occurrencies. The rare cases of solid facial edema in both acne and rosacea might hold the key to understanding the specific inflammatory pattern that creates both persisting inflammation and disturbed fluid homeostasis which can occur as a slightly different presentation in dermatomyositis, angioedema, Heerfordt's syndrome and other conditions

    Generalized pustular psoriasis is a disease distinct from psoriasis vulgaris: evidence and expert opinion

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe, clinically heterogeneous disease characterized by flares of widespread, noninfectious, macroscopically visible pustules that occur with or without systemic inflammation, and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, GPP has been classified as a variant of psoriasis vulgaris (PV, or plaque psoriasis); however, accumulating evidence indicates that these are distinct conditions, requiring different treatment approaches. Areas covered: In this perspective article we review evidence that supports the classification of GPP as distinct from PV. Expert opinion: The histopathologic and clinical appearance of GPP is distinct from that of PV and fundamental differences exist between the two conditions in terms of genetic causes and expression-related mechanisms of disease development. GPP results from dysregulation of the innate immune system, with disruption of the interleukin (IL)-36 inflammatory pathway, induction of inflammatory keratinocyte responses, and recruitment of neutrophils. PV is driven by the adaptive immune system, with a key role played by IL-17. Considering GPP as a separate disease will enable greater focus on its specific pathogenesis and the needs of patients. Many treatments for PV have insufficient efficacy in GPP and a therapeutic approach developed specifically for GPP might lead to better patient outcomes. Plain Language Summary: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare disease. During episodes of worsening disease, the immune system attacks the skin. This causes large areas of skin to become red and painful, pus-filled blisters suddenly form. Some people with GPP have a history of another, more common, skin condition called psoriasis vulgaris (PV). People with PV develop patches of scaly, itchy skin. In the past, GPP was classed as a type of PV and treated with the same medicines. However, these medicines do not work well in GPP. Researchers now understand more about what causes GPP and how it differs from PV. GPP can cause medical problems throughout the body, leading to life-threatening complications. This means that people with GPP often need urgent medical treatment in hospitals. People with PV are mostly treated outside of hospitals. Any other medical problems are not usually due to PV itself. Researchers have found several genes that are altered in people with GPP and PV, and they differ between the two diseases. For example, changes in a gene called IL36RN are common in GPP but are not seen in PV. The skin of people with these two diseases also looks different under a microscope. Knowing more about GPP and how it differs from PV will help people with GPP to be diagnosed more quickly. It will also help researchers to develop new medicines specifically for GPP, so people can receive better treatment in the future

    SelfClean: A Self-Supervised Data Cleaning Strategy

    Full text link
    Most benchmark datasets for computer vision contain irrelevant images, near duplicates, and label errors. Consequently, model performance on these benchmarks may not be an accurate estimate of generalization capabilities. This is a particularly acute concern in computer vision for medicine where datasets are typically small, stakes are high, and annotation processes are expensive and error-prone. In this paper we propose SelfClean, a general procedure to clean up image datasets exploiting a latent space learned with self-supervision. By relying on self-supervised learning, our approach focuses on intrinsic properties of the data and avoids annotation biases. We formulate dataset cleaning as either a set of ranking problems, which significantly reduce human annotation effort, or a set of scoring problems, which enable fully automated decisions based on score distributions. We demonstrate that SelfClean achieves state-of-the-art performance in detecting irrelevant images, near duplicates, and label errors within popular computer vision benchmarks, retrieving both injected synthetic noise and natural contamination. In addition, we apply our method to multiple image datasets and confirm an improvement in evaluation reliability

    Towards Reliable Dermatology Evaluation Benchmarks

    Full text link
    Benchmark datasets for digital dermatology unwittingly contain inaccuracies that reduce trust in model performance estimates. We propose a resource-efficient data cleaning protocol to identify issues that escaped previous curation. The protocol leverages an existing algorithmic cleaning strategy and is followed by a confirmation process terminated by an intuitive stopping criterion. Based on confirmation by multiple dermatologists, we remove irrelevant samples and near duplicates and estimate the percentage of label errors in six dermatology image datasets for model evaluation promoted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration. Along with this paper, we publish revised file lists for each dataset which should be used for model evaluation. Our work paves the way for more trustworthy performance assessment in digital dermatology.Comment: Link to the revised file lists: https://github.com/Digital-Dermatology/SelfClean-Revised-Benchmark

    Swiss Recommendations for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma

    Full text link
    Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer in Switzerland and worldwide. Most BCCs can be treated in a curative setting. However, patients can develop locally destructive and, rarely, metastatic tumors that require a different treatment approach. The clinical subtype of individual lesions provides prognostic information and influences management decisions. Surgical excision, topical therapies, and radiotherapy are highly effective in the majority of subtypes as well as in low- and high-risk diseases. For patients with low-risk diseases and superficial tumors not amenable to surgery, several nonsurgical alternatives are available. Systemic therapy is indicated for high-risk BCCs, which are not amenable to either surgery or radiotherapy. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) are currently approved. Other therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors show promising results in clinical trials. This first version of Swiss recommendations for diagnosis and management of BCC was prepared through extensive literature review and an advisory board consensus of expert dermatologists and oncologists in Switzerland. The present guidelines recommend therapies based on a multidisciplinary team approach and rate of recurrence for individual lesions. Based on the risk of recurrence, two distinct groups have been identified: low-risk (easy-to-treat) and high-risk (difficult-to-treat) tumors. Based on these classifications, evidence-based recommendations of available therapies are presented herein

    Swiss Recommendations for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma.

    Get PDF
    Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common nonmelanoma skin cancer in Switzerland and worldwide. Most BCCs can be treated in a curative setting. However, patients can develop locally destructive and, rarely, metastatic tumors that require a different treatment approach. The clinical subtype of individual lesions provides prognostic information and influences management decisions. Surgical excision, topical therapies, and radiotherapy are highly effective in the majority of subtypes as well as in low- and high-risk diseases. For patients with low-risk diseases and superficial tumors not amenable to surgery, several nonsurgical alternatives are available. Systemic therapy is indicated for high-risk BCCs, which are not amenable to either surgery or radiotherapy. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) are currently approved. Other therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors show promising results in clinical trials. This first version of Swiss recommendations for diagnosis and management of BCC was prepared through extensive literature review and an advisory board consensus of expert dermatologists and oncologists in Switzerland. The present guidelines recommend therapies based on a multidisciplinary team approach and rate of recurrence for individual lesions. Based on the risk of recurrence, two distinct groups have been identified: low-risk (easy-to-treat) and high-risk (difficult-to-treat) tumors. Based on these classifications, evidence-based recommendations of available therapies are presented herein

    Oral, esophageal and cutaneous lichen ruber planus controlled with alitretinoin: case report and review of the literature

    Full text link
    BACKGROUND: Therapy-resistant lichen planus (LP) can be a challenging condition for dermatologists. There are some case reports about successful treatments with alitretinoin of cutaneous and oral, but not of esophageal LP. OBJECTIVE: We present the unique case of a patient with cutaneous, oral and esophageal LP which was refractory to classical treatment options (topical clobetasol propionate and pimecrolimus, intramuscular triamcinolone acetonide); because of systemic side effects the patient did not tolerate systemic acitretin dosed up to 25 mg daily. Methods: Oral alitretinoin was used at a dose of 30 mg daily. RESULTS: Both oral and skin changes as well as dysphagia completely resolved within 4 weeks without any severe side effects and the drug was used for 6 months. No papules, intraoral striae or dysphagia recurred during the 6 months of treatment. After 4 months the patient relapsed with mucosal patches so that a second cycle was initiated for 6 months where oral LP lesions resolved after 4 weeks also (with sporadic mild headache). CONCLUSION: Further studies are needed to better understand the impact of alitretinoin in LP. Our observation suggests alitretinoin as a new, well-tolerated treatment option for esophageal LP after failed response to conventional treatments

    Spesolimab efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar pustulosis: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase IIb, dose-finding study

    Get PDF
    Introduction: We evaluated the anti-interleukin-36 receptor antibody spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP). Methods: This phase IIb trial comprised a loading dose period to week (W) 4, then maintenance dosing to W52. Patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:2 to subcutaneous spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 600 mg every 4 weeks (q4w), spesolimab 3000 mg to W4 then 300 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4 then 600 mg q4w, spesolimab 1500 mg to W4, 300 mg q4w to W16 then 300 mg every 8 weeks (q8w), or placebo switching to spesolimab 600 mg q4w at W16. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustular Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI) at W16. Secondary endpoints included a Palmoplantar Pustular Physician’s Global Assessment (PPP PGA) score of 0/1. Safety (including adverse events [AEs], local tolerability) was assessed. Results: 152 patients were treated. The primary endpoint was not met; mean differences for spesolimab versus placebo ranged from − 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: − 31.5%, 2.2%) to − 5.3% (95% CI: − 19.1%, 8.6%); none reached significance. At W16, 23 (21.1%) and two (4.7%) patients in the combined spesolimab and placebo groups, respectively, achieved PPP PGA 0/1 (mean difference 16.4%; 95% CI: 3.8%, 25.7%), increasing to 59 (54.1%; combined spesolimab) and 12 (27.9%; placebo switch to spesolimab) patients at W52. Non-Asian patients had significant improvements in the primary endpoint (mean difference − 17.7%; nominal P = 0.0394) and PPP PGA 0/1 at W16 with spesolimab versus placebo. Rates of AEs and AE-related discontinuations were similar for spesolimab and placebo. Local tolerability events and injection-site reactions were more frequent with spesolimab than placebo. Conclusion: The primary objective to demonstrate a non-flat dose–response relationship and proof-of-concept was not achieved; improvements with spesolimab occurred in secondary endpoints and in non-Asian patients, indicating potential modest benefits. Spesolimab was generally well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04015518)
    • 

    corecore