33 research outputs found

    Long term Simvastatin 40 mg prescribing in Intervention vs. Usual Care practices.

    No full text
    <p>Long term Simvastatin 40 mg prescribing in Intervention vs. Usual Care practices.</p

    Primary and secondary outcomes.

    No full text
    <p>For binary outcomes, summaries are presented as number (percent) and treatment effects as odds ratios (SOS vs Usual Care) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals estimated from logistic regression models, adjusted for matched pairs. For continuous outcomes (*), summaries are presented as geometric means and treatment effects are presented as ratios (SOS vs Usual Care) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals estimated from linear regression models of the logged values, adjusted for matched pairs.</p><p>Primary and secondary outcomes.</p

    Primary and secondary outcomes in incident and prevalent patients.

    No full text
    <p>For binary outcomes, summaries are presented as number (percent) and treatment effects as odds ratios (SOS vs Usual Care) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals estimated from logistic regression models, adjusted for matched pairs. For continuous outcomes (*), summaries are presented as geometric means and treatment effects are presented as ratios (SOS vs Usual Care) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals estimated from linear regression models of the logged values, adjusted for matched pairs.</p><p>Primary and secondary outcomes in incident and prevalent patients.</p

    Self-Perceived Mental Health Literacy Scores (1 = very poor, 7 = excellent) at baseline and 1 month (evaluable data) in treatment as usual (TAU) and guided self-help CBT (GSH-CBT) groups, with treatment effect difference (TAU - GSH-CBT), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value, from ANCOVA analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Self-Perceived Mental Health Literacy Scores (1 = very poor, 7 = excellent) at baseline and 1 month (evaluable data) in treatment as usual (TAU) and guided self-help CBT (GSH-CBT) groups, with treatment effect difference (TAU - GSH-CBT), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value, from ANCOVA analysis.</p

    Characteristics of study participants and non-participants.

    No full text
    a<p>Carstairs Depcat <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0052735#pone.0052735-McLoone1" target="_blank">[16]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0052735#pone.0052735-Williams3" target="_blank">[17]</a>: 1–7: 1 = most affluent areas; 7 = most deprived areas.</p

    Numerical Modal-analysis of Structures Based On a Revised Substructure Synthesis Approach

    Get PDF
    The classical substructuring approach to the problem of modal analysis of structures suffers from a number of drawbacks which can sometimes lead the analyst to prefer other, often more cumbersome, techniques. A modified Rayleigh-Ritz based approach is presented which circumvents most of the drawbacks and improves the precision of the method while also enhancing its applicability to complex structures. The scheme is also particularly well suited to symbolic implementation, in view of its systematic, problem-independent formulation. The theoretical results are validated by case studies chosen to highlight various features of the approach, viz., a beam structure, a hinged simple square plate, a hinged plate structure of fairly complicated shape, and a rectangular plate with two cutouts
    corecore