49 research outputs found
A multi-center validation study on the discrimination of Legionella pneumophila sg.1, Legionella pneumophila sg. 2-15 and Legionella non-pneumophila isolates from water by FT-IR spectroscopy
This study developed and validated a method, based on the coupling of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and machine learning, for the automated serotyping of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, Legionella pneumophila serogroups 2-15 as well as their successful discrimination from Legionella non-pneumophila. As Legionella presents significant intra- and inter-species heterogeneities, careful data validation strategies were applied to minimize late-stage performance variations of the method across a large microbial population. A total of 244 isolates were analyzed. In details, the method was validated with a multi-centric approach with isolates from Italian thermal and drinking water (n = 82) as well as with samples from German, Italian, French, and British collections (n = 162). Specifically, robustness of the method was verified over the time-span of 1 year with multiple operators and two different FT-IR instruments located in Italy and Germany. Moreover, different production procedures for the solid culture medium (in-house or commercial) and different culture conditions (with and without 2.5% CO2) were tested. The method achieved an overall accuracy of 100, 98.5, and 93.9% on the Italian test set of Legionella, an independent batch of Legionella from multiple European culture collections, and an extra set of rare Legionella non-pneumophila, respectively
Final report of ENGAGE ‐ Establishing Next Generation sequencing Ability for Genomic analysis in Europe
Analysis of immunization time, amplitude, and adverse events of seven different vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 across four different countries
BackgroundScarce information exists in relation to the comparison of seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Our aim was to correlate the magnitude of the antibody response to vaccination with previous clinical conditions and AEFI.MethodsA multicentric comparative study where SARS-CoV-2 spike 1-2 IgG antibodies IgG titers were measured at baseline, 21-28 days after the first and second dose (when applicable) of the following vaccines: BNT162b2 mRNA, mRNA-1273, Gam-COVID-Vac, Coronavac, ChAdOx1-S, Ad5-nCoV and Ad26.COV2. Mixed model and Poisson generalized linear models were performed.ResultsWe recruited 1867 individuals [52 (SD 16.8) years old, 52% men]. All vaccines enhanced anti-S1 and anti-S2 IgG antibodies over time (p<0.01). The highest increase after the first and second dose was observed in mRNA-1273 (p<0.001). There was an effect of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection; and an interaction of age with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, Gam-COVID-Vac and ChAdOx1-S (p<0.01). There was a negative correlation of Severe or Systemic AEFI (AEs) of naïve SARS-CoV-2 subjects with age and sex (p<0.001); a positive interaction between the delta of antibodies with Gam-COVID-Vac (p=0.002). Coronavac, Gam-COVID-Vac and ChAdOx1-S had less AEs compared to BNT162b (p<0.01). mRNA-1273 had the highest number of AEFIs. The delta of the antibodies showed an association with AEFIs in previously infected individuals (p<0.001).ConclusionsThe magnitude of seroconversion is predicted by age, vaccine type and SARS-CoV-2 exposure. AEs are correlated with age, sex, and vaccine type. The delta of the antibody response only correlates with AEs in patients previously exposed to SARS-CoV-2.Registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05228912
Safety Studies for European Space Nuclear Power Systems
Radioisotope power systems (RPS) have been employed in space since the dawn of spaceflight. They generate heat and electricity for long periods of time thanks to the radioactive decay of the fuel, independently of the solar flux; therefore, they are the most viable energy source for deep space missions and the exploration of planetary surfaces with long day/night cycles.
The European Space Agency (ESA) started its own RPS programme in 2009, aiming towards European capability and independence for RPS design and manufacturing; the selected fuel is americium-241, due to its availability and relatively cost-effective production in Europe. The University of Leicester is developing two RPS technologies: radioisotope thermoelectric generators and heater units.
An important aspect of any RPS programme is safety: the RPS must meet stringent design requirements to minimise the release of radioactive material into the environment in case of accident. Fundamental is the generation of data from experiments and models involving the fuel containment systems, in order to construct a safety case for their launch.
The activities here presented started in 2018 as a collaboration, supported by ESA, between the University of Leicester and ArianeGroup. The objectives were to perform the first-ever impact tests for the European heat sources, and to start developing models to simulate their behaviour in different impact accident scenarios. Metallographic analyses were then performed on the tested samples: the fuel inner containment layers had remained sealed, and they had successfully survived impacts at speeds three times higher than their final velocities. Their design could therefore be considered successful, although some minor improvements might still be required.
Since Europe and ESA currently do not have an operational nuclear launch safety framework, this project was also a key step in starting the definition of a launch safety and authorization process for European missions with RPS.</p
Radioisotope power systems in space missions:Overview of the safety aspects and recommendations for the European safety case
Transient perivascular inflammation of the carotid artery (TIPIC) syndrome in a patient with COVID-19
Overview of the issues related to the use of Radioisotope Power Systems in European space missions
Molecular characterization of "inconsistent" variants of<i> Salmonella</i> Typhimurium isolated in Italy
Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons
BackgroundCorrect sizing is challenging in radial head replacement and no consensus exists on the implant's optimal height and width to avoid elbow stiffness and instability. Studies exists, suggesting how to appropriately choose the implant size, but the manner by which the fracture pattern influences the surgeons' operative choices was not investigated.MethodsThe radial heads of four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were excised, measured, and fractured to simulate four patterns: three fragments (A); four fragments (B); comminuted (C); comminuted with bone loss (D). Nine examiners were asked to indicate first the maximum diameter of the radial heads with the help of dedicated sizing dishes and then the appropriate implant size with trial implants. Accuracy and precision were determined. A coefficient of variation was calculated and agreement was evaluated with the Bland-Altman method.ResultsAccuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with dedicated sizing dish were 96.73% and 93.64%, (best pattern, D; worst, C). Accuracy and precision of radial head diameter estimation with trial implants were 99.71% and 90.66% (best pattern, A; worst, D). Frequent modifications occurred between the initial radial head size proposal based on the sizing dish and the radial head size chosen after use of the trial implants (47.2%).ConclusionsDiameter estimation of radial heads with dedicated sizing dishes may be underestimated in comminuted fractures; when bone loss is present, this may lead to an overestimation, especially when using trial implants. Care is essential to determine the optimal size of the implant and to avoid overlenghtening and oversizing, which can be responsible for implant failure.Level of EvidenceBasic Science Study.Clinical RelevanceKnowledge of the manner by which the fracture pattern influences radial head replacement size estimation can help preventing overlenghtening and oversizing during this procedure