Induction of anti-tumor immunity by vaccination with dendritic cells pulsed with anti-CD44 IgG opsonized tumor cells

Due to the pivotal role that dendritic cells (DC) play in eliciting and maintaining functional anti-tumor T cell responses, these APC have been exploited against tumors. DC express several receptors for the Fc portion of IgG (Fcγ receptors) that mediate the internalization of antigen-IgG complexes and promote efficient MHC class I and II restricted antigen presentation. In this study, the efficacy of vaccination with DC pulsed with apoptotic B16 melanoma cells opsonized with an anti-CD44 IgG (B16-CD44) was explored. Immature bone marrow derived DC grown in vitro with IL-4 and GM-CSF were pulsed with B16-CD44. After 48 h of pulsing, maturation of DC was demonstrated by production of IL-12 and upregulation of CD80 and CD40 expression. To test the efficacy of vaccination with DC+B16-CD44, mice were vaccinated subcutaneously Lymphocytes from mice vaccinated with DC+B16-CD44 produced IFN-γ in response to B16 melanoma lysates as well as an MHC class I restricted B16 melanoma-associated peptide, indicating B16 specific CD8 T cell activation. Upon challenge with viable B16 cells, all mice vaccinated with DC alone developed tumor compared to 40% of mice vaccinated with DC+B16-CD44; 60% of the latter mice remained tumor free for at least 8 months. In addition, established lung tumors and distant metastases were significantly reduced in mice treated with DC+B16-CD44. Lastly, delayed growth of established subcutaneous tumors was induced by combination therapy with anti-CD44 antibodies followed by DC injection. This study demonstrates the efficacy of targeting tumor antigens to DC via Fcγ receptors.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/45862/1/262_2005_Article_104.pd

Rational engineering of antibody therapeutics targeting multiple oncogene pathways

Monoclonal antibodies have significantly advanced our ability to treat cancer, yet clinical studies have shown that many patients do not adequately respond to monospecific therapy. This is in part due to the multifactorial nature of the disease, where tumors rely on multiple and often redundant pathways for proliferation. Bi- or multi-specific antibodies capable of blocking multiple growth and survival pathways at once have a potential to better meet the challenge of blocking cancer growth, and indeed many of them are advancing in clinical development.1 However, bispecific antibodies present significant design challenges mostly due to the increased number of variables to consider. In this perspective we describe an innovative integrated approach to the discovery of bispecific antibodies with optimal molecular properties, such as affinity, avidity, molecular format and stability. This approach combines simulations of potential inhibitors using mechanistic models of the disease-relevant biological system to reveal optimal inhibitor characteristics with antibody engineering techniques that yield manufacturable therapeutics with robust pharmaceutical properties. We illustrate how challenges of meeting the optimal design criteria and chemistry, manufacturing and control concerns can be addressed simultaneously in the context of an accelerated therapeutic design cycle. Finally, to demonstrate how this rational approach can be applied, we present a case study where the insights from mechanistic modeling were used to guide the engineering of an IgG-like bispecific antibody

A plain language summary of results from the ADAURA study : osimertinib after surgery for patients who have early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

Altres ajuts: AstraZeneca.Here, we summarize the initial results from the ADAURA clinical study looking at treatment with osimertinib in patients with a specific type of non-small cell lung cancer (also called NSCLC). Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a medication used to treat a type of NSCLC with a change (mutation) in the EGFR gene, known as EGFR-mutated NSCLC. EGFR stands for 'epidermal growth factor receptor'. It is a protein present on the surface of both healthy and cancer cells that can regulate how cells grow and divide. Sometimes, certain mutations in EGFR can result in the EGFR protein malfunctioning, which can lead to the formation of cancer, like EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Based on previous clinical studies, osimertinib is already approved for use in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC that has spread beyond the lung (metastatic disease). This medication works to stop, prevent, or slow the growth of EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, by specifically blocking the activity of EGFR. In the ADAURA clinical study, participants had resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC, which means they had tumors that can be removed by surgery. Participants took either osimertinib or a placebo (a dummy drug with no active ingredient) after having their tumors removed by surgery. Post-surgery chemotherapy was allowed, but not compulsory (this was decided by the participant and their doctor). To date, the study has shown that osimertinib could be beneficial for patients with resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Participants who took osimertinib have stayed cancer-free for longer than those who took the placebo, regardless of whether or not they received chemotherapy after surgery. Osimertinib treatment also reduced the risk of tumors spreading to the brain and spinal cord, otherwise known as the central nervous system (also called CNS). The side effects experienced by the participants taking osimertinib have been consistent with what we already know. Based on the results from ADAURA, osimertinib has been approved for the treatment of resectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC after tumor removal. The ADAURA study is still ongoing and more results are expected to be released in the future. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT02511106

Correlation between week 24 trastuzumab-dkst response and week 48 progression-free survival: the HERITAGE trial

Background: Trastuzumab-dkst is a biosimilar of trastuzumab. The phase 3 HERITAGE trial demonstrated equivalent overall response rate (ORR) with trastuzumab-dkst or originator trastuzumab at 24 weeks in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. We now present the correlation of ORR with progression-free survival (PFS) for maintenance monotherapy with trastuzumabdkst vs trastuzumab at 48 weeks of treatment, and the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Methods: HERITAGE is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive trastuzumab-dkst or trastuzumab in combination with taxane followed by continued monotherapy until disease progression. The analysis included PFS at 48 weeks to support the primary efficacy endpoint of ORR and safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of trastuzumab-dkst vs trastuzumab as maintenance monotherapy. Results: Of 500 randomized patients, 342 entered the monotherapy phase; 214 patients received 48 weeks of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between PFS, ORR, or interimBackground: Trastuzumab-dkst is a biosimilar of trastuzumab. The phase 3 HERITAGE trial demonstrated equivalent overall response rate (ORR) with trastuzumab-dkst or originator trastuzumab at 24 weeks in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. We now present the correlation of ORR with progression-free survival (PFS) for maintenance monotherapy with trastuzumabdkst vs trastuzumab at 48 weeks of treatment, and the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Methods: HERITAGE is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 study. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive trastuzumab-dkst or trastuzumab in combination with taxane followed by continued monotherapy until disease progression. The analysis included PFS at 48 weeks to support the primary efficacy endpoint of ORR and safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of trastuzumab-dkst vs trastuzumab as maintenance monotherapy. Results: Of 500 randomized patients, 342 entered the monotherapy phase; 214 patients received 48 weeks of treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between PFS, ORR, or interim overall survival at week 48 between trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab. Week 24 ORR was highly correlated with week 48 PFS (rb ¼ 0.75). Cumulative treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious AEs were similar in both groups, with few grade ≥ 3 TEAEs. Immunogenicity was low and similar in both groups at 48 weeks. Conclusion: The correlation between ORR and PFS supports the design of first-line metastatic trials assessing biosimilar trastuzumab. Overall, trastuzumab-dkst and trastuzumab were well tolerated with similar efficacy, including ORR and PFS, in combination with a taxane followed by monotherapy