56 research outputs found
Giant Hydatid Cyst Originating from Psoas Muscle Extending to the Iliac Bone, Inguinal, and Femoral Canals: A Case Report and Current Literature Review
Retroperitoneal hydatid cysts are extremely rare and difficult to distinguish from other intra-abdominal pathologies, such as synovial sarcoma. In this study, we present a rare case of a complicated retroperitoneal hydatid cyst originating from the psoas muscle without any other focus. A 59-year-old male patient presented to the outpatient clinic with complaints of constipation and a feeling of gradually increasing swelling in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen and left groin area, progressing toward the left leg. In the examinations performed, a multiloculated giant hydatid cyst that filled the left pelvis in the retroperitoneal region, deviated the intra-abdominal organs to the right side, and extended to the left femoral and inguinal canals was detected. The patient underwent surgical excision and was followed up during the postoperative period. No evidence of recurrence was found at the patient’s 3rd and 6th month follow-ups. Primary muscle hydatid cysts necessitate a distinct approach to treatment and management when compared with hydatid cysts in other bodily organs. While recurrences remain a potential concern after resection, it is noteworthy that the window for the formation of fertile cysts typically spans up to 10 months. Thus, it is advisable to conduct regular postoperative follow-up examinations during the first year following surgery to ensure comprehensive monitoring and care
Interview with Marjorie Harkins Buchanan Kiewit
In this interview with Julia Stringfellow, Marjorie Harkins Buchanan Kiewit, LU class of 1943, discusses her time as a student as well as her time on the Board of Trustees.https://lux.lawrence.edu/oralhistories/1036/thumbnail.jp
Differences in the structural features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma
Aim: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) is a small glandular proliferation that has histological similarities with Gleason grade 1 and 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma (PACG1,2). There are no distinct histomorphological criteria distinguishing these two lesions from each other and other small glandular proliferations. Because treatment approaches are different for these lesions, it is necessary to determine histological criteria. The aim of this study is to review the histological features of these two lesions and to define new histological criteria distinguishing AAH from PACG1,2. We, therefore, assessed 18 anatomical and structural parameters.
Materials and Methods: We found 11 AAH (22 foci) and 15 PACG1,2 (22 foci) cases in 105 radical prostatectomy specimens. Basal cell-specific antikeratin was applied to these lesions. We assumed that PACG1,2 lesions did have not basal cells and we grouped the lesions as AAH and PACG1,2 based on this assumption.
Results: We found differences between AAH and PACG1,2 lesions for some parameters including the number of glands, structures such as the main ductus and basal cells. We found similar properties in the two lesions for the following parameters: localization, multiplicity, diameter of the lesion, focus asymmetry, distance between glands, inflammatory cells in and out of the lesions, secretory cell shape on the luminal side, papillary projection towards the luminal side of gland, the shape of the outer gland, the infiltrative pattern of the gland, glandular pleomorphism, biggest gland diameter and median gland diameter.
Conclusion: We determined that concurrent evaluation of histomorphological features was important to differentiate between AAH and PACG1,2
- …