14 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
The role of breeders' organisations and state in animal identification and recording in CEE countries: Proceedings of the Workshop held in Bled, Slovenia, 15 May 2000
The
development of synthetic nanomaterials that could embed within,
penetrate, or induce fusion between membranes without permanent disruption
would have great significance for biomedical applications. Here we
describe structure–function relationships of highly water-soluble
gold nanoparticles comprised of an ∼1.5–5 nm diameter
metal core coated by an amphiphilic organic ligand shell, which exhibit
membrane embedding and fusion activity mediated by the surface ligands.
Using an environment-sensitive dye anchored within the ligand shell
as a sensor of membrane embedding, we demonstrate that particles with
core sizes of ∼2–3 nm are capable of embedding within
and penetrating fluid bilayers. At the nanoscale, these particles
also promote spontaneous fusion of liposomes or spontaneously embed
within intact liposomal vesicles. These studies provide nanoparticle
design and selection principles that could be used in drug delivery
applications, as membrane stains, or for the creation of novel organic/inorganic
nanomaterial self-assemblies
Analysis of the rotor temperature.
<p>(A) Temperature values obtained in different instruments of the spinning rotor, as measured in the iButton at 1,000 rpm after temperature equilibration, while the set point for the console temperature is 20°C (indicated as dotted vertical line). The box-and-whisker plot indicates the central 50% of the data as solid line, with the median displayed as vertical line, and individual circles for data in the upper and lower 25% percentiles. The mean and standard deviation is 19.62°C ± 0.41°C. (B) Correlation between iButton temperature and measured BSA monomer <i>s</i>-values corrected for radial magnification, scan time, scan velocity, but not viscosity (symbols). In addition to the data from the present study as shown in (A) (circles), also shown are measurements from the pilot study [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0126420#pone.0126420.ref027" target="_blank">27</a>] where the same experiments were carried out on instruments not included in the present study (stars). The dotted line describes the theoretically expected temperature-dependence considering solvent viscosity.</p
Examples for the determination of radial magnification errors.
<p>(A) Radial intensity profile measured in scans of the precision mask. Blue lines are experimental scans, and shaded areas indicate the regions expected to be illuminated on the basis of the known mask geometry. In this example, the increasing difference between the edges corresponds to a calculated radial magnification error of -3.1%. (B—D) Examples for differences between the experimentally measured positions of the light/dark transitions (blue circles, arbitrarily aligned for absolute mask position) and the known edge distances of the mask. The solid lines indicate the linear or polynomial fit. (B) Approximately linear magnification error with a slope corresponding to an error of -0.04%. Also indicated as thin lines are the confidence intervals of the linear regression. (C) A bimodal shift pattern of left and right edges, likely resulting from out-of-focus location of the mask, with radial magnification error of -1.7%. (D) A non-linear distortion leading to a radial magnification error of -0.53% in the <i>s</i>-values from the analysis of back-transformed data. The thin grey lines in C and D indicate the best linear fit through all data points.</p
Absence of a long-term trend in <i>s</i><sub><i>20T</i>,<i>t</i>,<i>r</i>,<i>v</i></sub>-values of the BSA monomer with time of experiment for the three kits (blue, green, and magenta).
<p>Highlighted as bold solid line is the overall average, and the grey area indicates one standard deviation.</p
Observed fraction of dimer (as a ratio of dimer peak area to the sum of monomer plus dimer peak areas).
<p>The box-and-whisker plot indicates the central 50% of the data as solid line and draws the smaller and larger 25% percentiles as individual circles. The median displayed as vertical line. The mean and standard deviations are 18.5% ± 1.1% for the absorbance system, and 19.0% ± 2.1% for the interference system.</p
Corrected best-fit apparent monomer molecular mass from integration of the <i>c</i>(<i>s</i>) peak when scanned with the absorbance system (green) and the interference system (magenta).
<p>Only data with rmsd less than 0.01 OD or 0.01 fringes were included. The box-and-whisker plot indicates the central 50% of the data as solid line and draws the smaller and larger 25% percentiles as individual circles. The median is displayed as a vertical line.</p
Distributions of calculated BSA monomer signals for the different kits and the different optical systems.
<p>The box-and-whisker plots indicate the central 50% of the data as solid line and draw the smaller and larger 25% percentiles as individual circles. The median for each group is displayed as vertical line.</p
Correlations of the <i>s</i><sub><i>20T</i>,<i>t</i>,<i>r</i>,<i>v</i></sub>-values of the BSA monomer with the difference of the best-fit meniscus from the mean meniscus value, separately for absorbance data sets (A) and interference data sets (B).
<p>The difference of the best-fit meniscus to the mean was calculated separately for each kit, to eliminate offsets due to different sample volumes in each kit, and then merged into groups for the optical systems. Data are shown as a histogram with frequency values indicated in the colorbar. The dotted lines show the theoretically expected dependence of the apparent <i>s</i>-value on errors in the absolute radial position.</p
Root-mean-square deviation of the best-fit <i>c</i>(<i>s</i>) model of the BSA sedimentation experiment when scanned with the absorbance system (green) and the interference system (magenta).
<p>The box-and-whisker plot indicates the central 50% of the data as solid line and draws the smaller and larger 25% percentiles as individual circles. The median is displayed as a vertical line.</p
Magnitude of the radial magnification correction obtained with the absorbance system (green) and the interference system (magenta).
<p>The box-and-whisker plot above the histogram indicates the central 50% of the data as solid horizontal line and draws data in the smallest and highest 25% percentiles as individual circles. The median is displayed as vertical line. The mean and standard deviations are -0.43% ±1.36% for the absorbance system, and -0.75% ± 0.82% for the interference system (once the three outliers are excluded).</p