Plasma Androgen Receptor and Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Plasma androgen receptor (AR) gain identifies metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with worse outcome on abiraterone/enzalutamide but its relevance in the context of taxane chemotherapy is unknown. We aimed to evaluate whether docetaxel is active regardless of plasma AR and to perform exploratory analysis to compare docetaxel with abiraterone/enzalutamide. This multi-institution study was a pooled analysis of AR status, determined by droplet digital PCR, on pre-treatment plasma samples. We evaluated associations between plasma AR and overall/progression-free survival (OS/PFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate in 163 docetaxel-treated patients. OS was significantly shorter in AR-gain [hazard ratio (HR)=1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.08-2.39, p=0.018), but not PFS (HR=1.04, 95%CI 0.74-1.46, p=0.8), nor PSA response [odds ratio (OR)=1.14, 95%CI=0.65-1.99, p=0.7)]. We investigated the interaction between plasma AR and treatment type after incorporating updated data from our prior study of 7 chemotherapy-naïve, abiraterone/enzalutamide-treated patients with data from 115 first-line docetaxel patients. In an exploratory analysis of mCRPC receiving first-line therapies, a significant interaction was observed between plasma AR and docetaxel versus abiraterone/enzalutamide for OS (HR=0.27,95%CI=0.11-0.68, p=0.005) and PFS (HR=0.28, 95%CI=0.12-0.64, p=0.002). Specifically, we reported a significant difference for OS favoring abiraterone/enzalutamide for AR-normal (HR=1.93, 95%CI=1.19-3.12, p=0.008) and a suggestion favoring docetaxel for AR-gained patients (HR=0.53, 95%CI=0.24-1.16, p=0.11). These data suggest that AR-normal patients should receive abiraterone/enzalutamide and AR-gained docetaxel. This treatment selection merits prospective evaluation in a randomized trial. // Patient summary: We investigated whether plasma androgen receptor (AR) predicted outcome in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with docetaxel, and we performed an exploratory analysis in patients treated with docetaxel or AR-directed drugs as first-line mCRPC therapy. We showed that plasma AR normal favored hormonal treatment, whilst plasma AR-gained patients may have had a longer response to docetaxel, suggesting that plasma AR status could be a useful treatment selection biomarker

Plasma androgen receptor and response to adapted and standard docetaxel regimen in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A multicenter biomarker study

Background: Plasma AR status has been identified as a potential biomarker of response in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving docetaxel or AR-targeted therapies. However, the relevance of plasma AR in the overall management of CRPC patients receiving different docetaxel doses is unknown. Patients and methods: This was a multi-institution study of associations between baseline plasma AR copy number status, assessed by droplet digital PCR, and outcome in 325 mCRPC patients receiving docetaxel at standard or adapted regimen at the discretion of the treating physician. Upon analysis, patients were assigned randomly to either a training (n = 217) or validation (n = 108) cohort. Results: In the training cohort, AR-gained patients treated with adapted docetaxel regimen had a significantly worse median progression-free survival (PFS) (3.8 vs 6.3 months, hazard ratio [HR] 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34–4.95, p < 0.0001), median overall survival (10.8 vs 20.6 months, HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.09–3.62, p = 0.0064) and PSA response (PSA > −50%: odds ratio 4.88 95%CI 1.55–14.32, p = 0.013) as compared to plasma AR normal patients. These findings were all confirmed in the validation cohort. However, in patients treated with standard docetaxel regimen, these differences were not seen. The interaction between AR CN status and dose reduction of docetaxel was considered as independent factor for PFS in both the training and validation cohort (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.41–5.73, p = 0.003, and HR 4.79, 95% CI 1.79–12.82, p = 0.002). Conclusion: Despite the retrospective non-randomised design of this study, our hypothesis-generating findings could suggest plasma AR as a potential biomarker for optimal docetaxel timing and dose in mCRPC patients. Prospective trials are warranted

Corrigendum: Cost-effective, safe, and personalized cell therapy for critical limb ischemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (vol 10, 1151, 2019)

Reference 86 was also included as “Escacena N. Cellular medication as a therapeutic alternative in chronic critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients without the possibility of revascularization. Dissertation Thesis. Sevilla Spain: University of Sevilla. (2016)”. This reference should be included as number 107 “Escacena N. Cellular medication as a therapeutic alternative in chronic critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients without the possibility of revascularization (Dissertation Thesis). University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain (2016).

Cost-effective, safe, and personalized cell therapy for critical limb ischemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cell therapy is a progressively growing field that is rapidly moving from preclinical model development to clinical application. Outcomes obtained from clinical trials reveal the therapeutic potential of stem cell-based therapy to deal with unmet medical treatment needs for several disorders with no therapeutic options. Among adult stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the leading cell type used in advanced therapies for the treatment of autoimmune, inflammatory and vascular diseases. To date, the safety and feasibility of autologous MSC-based therapy has been established; however, their indiscriminate use has resulted in mixed outcomes in preclinical and clinical studies. While MSCs derived from diverse tissues share common properties depending on the type of clinical application, they markedly differ within clinical trials in terms of efficacy, resulting in many unanswered questions regarding the application of MSCs. Additionally, our experience in clinical trials related to critical limb ischemia pathology (CLI) shows that the therapeutic efficacy of these cells in different animal models has only been partially reproduced in humans through clinical trials. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new research to identify pitfalls, to optimize procedures and to clarify the repair mechanisms used by these cells, as well as to be able to offer a next generation of stem cell that can be routinely used in a cost-effective and safe manner in stem cell-based therapies targeting CLI

Corrigendum: Cost-effective, safe, and personalized cell therapy for critical limb ischemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (vol 10, 1151, 2019)

Reference 86 was also included as “Escacena N. Cellular medication as a therapeutic alternative in chronic critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients without the possibility of revascularization. Dissertation Thesis. Sevilla Spain: University of Sevilla. (2016)”. This reference should be included as number 107 “Escacena N. Cellular medication as a therapeutic alternative in chronic critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients without the possibility of revascularization (Dissertation Thesis). University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain (2016).

Cost-effective, safe, and personalized cell therapy for critical limb ischemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Cell therapy is a progressively growing field that is rapidly moving from preclinical model development to clinical application. Outcomes obtained from clinical trials reveal the therapeutic potential of stem cell-based therapy to deal with unmet medical treatment needs for several disorders with no therapeutic options. Among adult stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the leading cell type used in advanced therapies for the treatment of autoimmune, inflammatory and vascular diseases. To date, the safety and feasibility of autologous MSC-based therapy has been established; however, their indiscriminate use has resulted in mixed outcomes in preclinical and clinical studies. While MSCs derived from diverse tissues share common properties depending on the type of clinical application, they markedly differ within clinical trials in terms of efficacy, resulting in many unanswered questions regarding the application of MSCs. Additionally, our experience in clinical trials related to critical limb ischemia pathology (CLI) shows that the therapeutic efficacy of these cells in different animal models has only been partially reproduced in humans through clinical trials. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new research to identify pitfalls, to optimize procedures and to clarify the repair mechanisms used by these cells, as well as to be able to offer a next generation of stem cell that can be routinely used in a cost-effective and safe manner in stem cell-based therapies targeting CLI