A prospective study from south India to compare the severity of malaria caused by Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum and dual infection

Background & objectives: Traditionally, Plasmodium falciparum has been attributed to cause severe malaria, whereas P. vivax is considered to cause "benign" tertian malaria. Recently, there has been an increasing body of evidence challenging this conviction. However, the spectrum and degree of severity of the disease caused by P. vivax, as per World Health Organization (2012) remains unclear. Thus, in this prospective study, we aimed at comparing the severity of malaria caused by P. vivax, P. falciparum and dual infection. Methods: Adult patients presenting to Christian Medical College, Vellore from October 2012 to September 2013 with microscopically confirmed malaria were included in the study. Their clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded and analyzed. Paired t-test and chi-square with 95% CI and post-hoc analyses using the Scheffι post-hoc criterion were used to assess the statistical significance at the level of α <0.05. Results: In total, 131 cases of malaria were identified during the study period, comprising 83 cases of P. vivax, 35 cases of P. falciparum and 13 cases of mixed vivax and falciparum infections. The spectrum and degree of hematological, hepatic, renal, metabolic, central nervous system complications of vivax malaria was not different from that of falciparum group. Thrombocytopenia and hyperbilirubinemia were the most common laboratory abnormalities identified in all the groups. Interpretation & conclusion: This cross-sectional comparative study clearly demonstrates that clinical features, complications and case-fatality rates in vivax malaria can be as severe as in falciparum malaria. Hence, vivax malaria could not be considered benign; and appropriate preventive strategies along with antimalarial therapies should be adopted for control and elimination of this disease

Chest radiographic manifestations of scrub typhus

Background and Rationale: Respiratory system involvement in scrub typhus is seen in 20–72% of patients. In endemic areas, good understanding and familiarity with the various radiologic findings of scrub typhus are essential in identifying pulmonary complications. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to a tertiary care center with scrub typhus between October 2012 and September 2013 and had a chest X ray done were included in the analysis. Details and radiographic findings were noted and factors associated with abnormal X-rays were analyzed. Results: The study cohort contained 398 patients. Common presenting complaints included fever (100%), generalized myalgia (83%), headache (65%), dyspnea (54%), cough (24.3%), and altered sensorium (14%). Almost half of the patients (49.4%) had normal chest radiographs. Common radiological pulmonary abnormalities included pleural effusion (14.6%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (14%), airspace opacity (10.5%), reticulonodular opacities (10.3%), peribronchial thickening (5.8%), and pulmonary edema (2%). Cardiomegaly was noted in 3.5% of patients. Breathlessness, presence of an eschar, platelet counts of 2 mg/dL had the highest odds of having an abnormal chest radiograph. Patients with an abnormal chest X-ray had a higher requirement of noninvasive ventilation (odds ratio [OR]: 13.98; 95% confidence interval CI: 5.89–33.16), invasive ventilation (OR: 18.07; 95% CI: 6.42–50.88), inotropes (OR: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.35–17.62), higher involvement of other organ systems, longer duration of hospital stay (3.18 ± 3 vs. 7.27 ± 5.58 days; P< 0.001), and higher mortality (OR: 4.63; 95% CI: 1.54–13.85). Conclusion: Almost half of the patients with scrub typhus have abnormal chest radiographs. Chest radiography should be included as part of basic evaluation at presentation in patients with scrub typhus, especially in those with breathlessness, eschar, jaundice, and severe thrombocytopenia