Experiments and modeling

The usual approach in establishing the correctness and accuracy of turbulence models is to numerically solve the modeled differential equations and then compare the results with the experiment. However, in the case of a discrepancy, this procedure does not pinpoint where in the model the drawback lies. It is also possible that the model overcompensates one physical phenomenon and undercompensates the other so that the net result is a good agreement between the two. Therefore, a more desirable approach is to directly compare the individual terms in the equations with their models. To achieve this objective, primary physical experiments were used to carry out the second moment budgets. These can then be used to analyze and assess various models and closure assumptions and seek improvements/modifications where models prove deficient

Turbulence modeling and experiments

The best way of verifying turbulence is to do a direct comparison between the various terms and their models. The success of this approach depends upon the availability of the data for the exact correlations (both experimental and DNS). The other approach involves numerically solving the differential equations and then comparing the results with the data. The results of such a computation will depend upon the accuracy of all the modeled terms and constants. Because of this it is sometimes difficult to find the cause of a poor performance by a model. However, such a calculation is still meaningful in other ways as it shows how a complete Reynolds stress model performs. Thirteen homogeneous flows are numerically computed using the second order closure models. We concentrate only on those models which use a linear (or quasi-linear) model for the rapid term. This, therefore, includes the Launder, Reece and Rodi (LRR) model; the isotropization of production (IP) model; and the Speziale, Sarkar, and Gatski (SSG) model. Which of the three models performs better is examined along with what are their weaknesses, if any. The other work reported deal with the experimental balances of the second moment equations for a buoyant plume. Despite the tremendous amount of activity toward the second order closure modeling of turbulence, very little experimental information is available about the budgets of the second moment equations. Part of the problem stems from our inability to measure the pressure correlations. However, if everything else appearing in these equations is known from the experiment, pressure correlations can be obtained as the closing terms. This is the closest we can come to in obtaining these terms from experiment, and despite the measurement errors which might be present in such balances, the resulting information will be extremely useful for the turbulence modelers. The purpose of this part of the work was to provide such balances of the Reynolds stress and heat flux equations for the buoyant plume

Critical assessment of Reynolds stress turbulence models using homogeneous flows

In modeling the rapid part of the pressure correlation term in the Reynolds stress transport equations, extensive use has been made of its exact properties which were first suggested by Rotta. These, for example, have been employed in obtaining the widely used Launder, Reece and Rodi (LRR) model. Some recent proposals have dropped one of these properties to obtain new models. We demonstrate, by computing some simple homogeneous flows, that doing so does not lead to any significant improvements over the LRR model and it is not the right direction in improving the performance of existing models. The reason for this, in our opinion, is that violation of one of the exact properties can not bring in any new physics into the model. We compute thirteen homogeneous flows using LRR (with a recalibrated rapid term constant), IP and SSG models. The flows computed include the flow through axisymmetric contraction; axisymmetric expansion; distortion by plane strain; and homogeneous shear flows with and without rotation. Results show that for most general representation for a model linear in the anisotropic tensor, performs either better or as good as the other two models of the same level

Assessment and development of second order turbulence models

Second order turbulence models describe the effect of mean flow and external agencies (such as buoyancy) on the evolution of turbulence. Therefore, in principle, these models give a more accurate description of complicated flow fields (e.g. flows with large anisotropy in turbulence, such as near the leading edge of a turbine blade) than the two equation models. The objectives of this document are to assess the performance of the various second order turbulence models in benchmark flows and to seek improvements where necessary in models for the pressure correlation term in the scalar flux equation and for the scalar dissipation equation

Advances in modeling the pressure correlation terms in the second moment equations

In developing turbulence models, various model constraints were proposed in an attempt to make the model equations more general (or universal). The most recent of these are the realizability principle, the linearity principle, the rapid distortion theory, and the material indifference principle. Several issues are discussed concerning these principles and special attention is payed to the realizability principle. Realizability (defined as the requirement of non-negative energy and Schwarz' inequality between any fluctuating quantities) is the basic physical and mathematical principle that any modeled equation should obey. Hence, it is the most universal, important and also the minimal requirement for a model equation to prevent it from producing unphysical results. The principle of realizability is described in detail, the realizability conditions are derived for various turbulence models, and the model forms are proposed for the pressure correlation terms in the second moment equations. Detailed comparisons of various turbulence models with experiments and direct numerical simulations are presented. As a special case of turbulence, the two dimensional two-component turbulence modeling is also discussed

Image Segmentation Using Marker-Controlled Watershed Transformation and Morphology

The watershed segmentation methods are essential methods, to be considered for quick results in image handling and analysis. However, the main problem arises in produced image because it causes excess segmentation and noise. This research is conducted to improve this presented algorithm based on the mathematical morphology and filters to minimize flaws mentioned in that paper. Objective of this research is to find the gaps in the existing literary works. In most cases, themarker based segmentation is best because it marks the part of segment. The working of this proposed algorithm is checked by optimization of the part that is still an area of research

A vorticity dynamics based model for the turbulent dissipation: Model development and validation

A new model dissipation rate equation is proposed based on the dynamic equation of the mean-square vorticity fluctuation for large Reynolds number turbulence. The advantage of working with the vorticity fluctuation equation is that the physical meanings of the terms in this equation are more clear than those in the dissipation rate equation. Hence, the model development based on the vorticity fluctuation equation is more straightforward. The resulting form of the model equation is consistent with the spectral energy cascade analysis introduced by Lumley. The proposed model dissipation rate equation is numerically well behaved and can be applied to any level of turbulence modeling. It is applied to a realizable eddy viscosity model. Flows that are examined include: rotating homogeneous shear flows; free shear flows; a channel flow and flat plate boundary layers with and without pressure gradients; and backward facing step separated flows. In most cases, the present model predictions show considerable improvement over the standard kappa-epsilon model