Twelve recommendations for advancing marine conservation in European and contiguous seas

Like most ocean regions today, the European and contiguous seas experience cumulative impacts from local human activities and global pressures. They are largely in poor environmental condition with deteriorating trends. Despite several success stories, European policies for marine conservation fall short of being effective. Acknowledging the challenges for marine conservation, a 4-year multi-national network, MarCons, supported collaborative marine conservation efforts to bridge the gap between science, management and policy, aiming to contribute in reversing present negative trends. By consolidating a large network of more than 100 scientists from 26 countries, and conducting a series of workshops over 4 years (2016–2020), MarCons analyzed challenges, opportunities and obstacles for advancing marine conservation in the European and contiguous seas. Here, we synthesize the major issues that emerged from this analysis and make 12 key recommendations for policy makers, marine managers, and researchers. To increase the effectiveness of marine conservation planning, we recommend (1) designing coherent networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) in the framework of marine spatial planning (MSP) and applying systematic conservation planning principles, including re-evaluation of existing management zones, (2) designing MPA networks within a broader transboundary planning framework, and (3) implementing integrated land-freshwater-sea approaches. To address inadequate or poorly informed management, we recommend (4) developing and implementing adaptive management plans in all sites of the Natura 2000 European conservation network and revising the Natura 2000 framework, (5) embedding and implementing cumulative effects assessments into a risk management process and making them operational, and (6) promoting actions to reach ‘good environmental status’ in all European waters. To account for global change in conservation planning and management, we further recommend (7) developing conservation strategies to address the impacts of global change, for example identifying climate-change refugia as high priority conservation areas, and (8) incorporating biological invasions in conservation plans and prioritizing management actions to control invasive species. Finally, to improve current practices that may compromise the effectiveness of conservation actions, we recommend (9) reinforcing the collection of high-quality open-access data, (10) improving mechanisms for public participation in MPA planning and management, (11) prioritizing conservation goals in full collaboration with stakeholders, and (12) addressing gender inequality in marine sciences and conservation

Characterization of a recurrent translocation t(2;3)(p15–22;q26) occurring in acute myeloid leukaemia

Six patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and a t(2;3)(p15-21;q26-27) were identified among approximately 1000 cases enrolled in the GIMEMA trial. The t(2;3) was the sole anomaly in three patients, whereas in three cases monosomy 7, trisomy 15 and 22, and trisomy 14 represented additional aberrations. No cryptic chromosome deletions at 5q, 7q, 12p, and 20q were observed. One patient carried a FLT3 D835 mutation; FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) was not detected in three patients tested. Characterization of the translocation breakpoints using a 3q26 BAC contig specific for the PRDM3 locus showed that the breakpoints were located 5' to EVIl as follows: within myelodysplatic syndrome (MDS) intron 1 (# 3), between MDS1 exons 2 and 3 in three patients (# 1, 2, 4) with a 170bp cryptic deletion distal to the breakpoint in one (# 2), and in a more centromeric position spanning from intron 2 to the 5' region of EVI1 (# 6, 5). A set of 2p16-21 BAC probes showed that the breakpoints on chromosome 2p were located within BCL11A in two separate regions (# 1, 4 and # 2-5), within the thyroid adenoma-associated (THADA) gene (# 6) or distal to the ZFP36L2 locus (# 3). Regulatory elements were present in proximity of these breakpoints. RACE PCR studies revealed a chimeric transcript in 1/6 patient analyzed, but no fusion protein. Quantitative PCR showed a 21-58-fold over-expression of the EVIl gene in all cases analyzed. The patients showed dysplasia of at least two myeloid cell lineages in all cases; they had a low-to-normal platelet count and displayed an immature CD34+ CD117+ immunophenotype. Despite intensive chemotherapy and a median age of 43 years (range 36-59), only two patients attained a short-lived response; one patient is alive with active disease at 12 months, five died at 4-14 months. We arrived at the following conclusions: (a) the t(2;3) is a recurrent translocation having an approximate 0.5% incidence in adult AML; (b) breakpoints involve the 5' region of EVIl at 3q26, and the BCL11A, the THADA gene or other regions at 2p16.1-21; (c) cryptic deletions distal to the 3q26 breakpoint may occur in some cases; (d) the juxtaposition of the 5' region of EVIl with regulatory elements normally located on chromosome 2 brings about EVI1 overexpression; (e) clinical outcome in these cases is severe

Characterization of a recurrent translocation t(2;3)(pl5-22;q26) occurring in acute myeloid leukemia

Six patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and a t(2;3)(p15-21;q26-27) were identified among approximately 1000 cases enrolled in the GIMEMA trial. The t(2;3) was the sole anomaly in three patients, whereas in three cases monosomy 7, trisomy 15 and 22, and trisomy 14 represented additional aberrations. No cryptic chromosome deletions at 5q, 7q, 12p, and 20q were observed. One patient carried a FLT3 D835 mutation; FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) was not detected in three patients tested. Characterization of the translocation breakpoints using a 3q26 BAC contig specific for the PRDM3 locus showed that the breakpoints were located 5' to EVIl as follows: within myelodysplatic syndrome (MDS) intron 1 (# 3), between MDS1 exons 2 and 3 in three patients (# 1, 2, 4) with a 170bp cryptic deletion distal to the breakpoint in one (# 2), and in a more centromeric position spanning from intron 2 to the 5' region of EVI1 (# 6, 5). A set of 2p16-21 BAC probes showed that the breakpoints on chromosome 2p were located within BCL11A in two separate regions (# 1, 4 and # 2-5), within the thyroid adenoma-associated (THADA) gene (# 6) or distal to the ZFP36L2 locus (# 3). Regulatory elements were present in proximity of these breakpoints. RACE PCR studies revealed a chimeric transcript in 1/6 patient analyzed, but no fusion protein. Quantitative PCR showed a 21-58-fold over-expression of the EVIl gene in all cases analyzed. The patients showed dysplasia of at least two myeloid cell lineages in all cases; they had a low-to-normal platelet count and displayed an immature CD34+ CD117+ immunophenotype. Despite intensive chemotherapy and a median age of 43 years (range 36-59), only two patients attained a short-lived response; one patient is alive with active disease at 12 months, five died at 4-14 months. We arrived at the following conclusions: (a) the t(2;3) is a recurrent translocation having an approximate 0.5% incidence in adult AML; (b) breakpoints involve the 5' region of EVIl at 3q26, and the BCL11A, the THADA gene or other regions at 2p16.1-21; (c) cryptic deletions distal to the 3q26 breakpoint may occur in some cases; (d) the juxtaposition of the 5' region of EVIl with regulatory elements normally located on chromosome 2 brings about EVI1 overexpression; (e) clinical outcome in these cases is severe