Pharmacogenomic and structural analysis of constitutive G-protein coupled receptor activity

Premi a l'excel·lència investigadora. Àmbit de les Ciències de la Salut. 2008G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) respond to a chemically diverse plethora of signal transduction molecules. The notion that GPCRs also signal without an external chemical trigger, i.e. in a constitutive or spontaneous manner, resulted in a paradigm shift in the field of GPCR pharmacology. With the recognition of constitutive GPCR activity and the fact that GPCR binding and signaling can be strongly affected by a single point mutation, GPCR pharmacogenomics obtained a lot of attention. For a variety of GPCRs, point mutations have been convincingly linked to human disease. Mutations within conserved motifs, known to be involved in GPCR activation, might explain the properties of some naturally occurring constitutively active GPCR variants linked to disease. A brief history historical introduction to the present concept of constitutive receptor activity is given and the pharmacogenomic and the structural aspects of constitutive receptor activity are described

Lipidomics: A Tool for Studies of Atherosclerosis

Lipids, abundant constituents of both the vascular plaque and lipoproteins, play a pivotal role in atherosclerosis. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of lipids, called lipidomics, presents a number of opportunities not only for understanding the cellular processes in health and disease but also in enabling personalized medicine. Lipidomics in its most advanced form is able to quantify hundreds of different molecular lipid species with various structural and functional roles. Unraveling this complexity will improve our understanding of diseases such as atherosclerosis at a level of detail not attainable with classical analytical methods. Improved patient selection, biomarkers for gauging treatment efficacy and safety, and translational models will be facilitated by the lipidomic deliverables. Importantly, lipid-based biomarkers and targets should lead the way as we progress toward more specialized therapeutics

Stability of the Neurotensin Receptor NTS1 Free in Detergent Solution and Immobilized to Affinity Resin

Purification of recombinant membrane receptors is commonly achieved by use of an affinity tag followed by an additional chromatography step if required. This second step may exploit specific receptor properties such as ligand binding. However, the effects of multiple purification steps on protein yield and integrity are often poorly documented. We have previously reported a robust two-step purification procedure for the recombinant rat neurotensin receptor NTS1 to give milligram quantities of functional receptor protein. First, histidine-tagged receptors are enriched by immobilized metal affinity chromatography using Ni-NTA resin. Second, remaining contaminants in the Ni-NTA column eluate are removed by use of a subsequent neurotensin column yielding pure NTS1. Whilst the neurotensin column eluate contained functional receptor protein, we observed in the neurotensin column flow-through misfolded NTS1.To investigate the origin of the misfolded receptors, we estimated the amount of functional and misfolded NTS1 at each purification step by radio-ligand binding, densitometry of Coomassie stained SDS-gels, and protein content determination. First, we observed that correctly folded NTS1 suffers damage by exposure to detergent and various buffer compositions as seen by the loss of [(3)H]neurotensin binding over time. Second, exposure to the neurotensin affinity resin generated additional misfolded receptor protein.Our data point towards two ways by which misfolded NTS1 may be generated: Damage by exposure to buffer components and by close contact of the receptor to the neurotensin affinity resin. Because NTS1 in detergent solution is stabilized by neurotensin, we speculate that the occurrence of aggregated receptor after contact with the neurotensin resin is the consequence of perturbations in the detergent belt surrounding the NTS1 transmembrane core. Both effects reduce the yield of functional receptor protein

Functional selectivity of adenosine receptor ligands

Adenosine receptors are plasma membrane proteins that transduce an extracellular signal into the interior of the cell. Basically every mammalian cell expresses at least one of the four adenosine receptor subtypes. Recent insight in signal transduction cascades teaches us that the current classification of receptor ligands into agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists relies very much on the experimental setup that was used. Upon activation of the receptors by the ubiquitous endogenous ligand adenosine they engage classical G protein-mediated pathways, resulting in production of second messengers and activation of kinases. Besides this well-described G protein-mediated signaling pathway, adenosine receptors activate scaffold proteins such as β-arrestins. Using innovative and sensitive experimental tools, it has been possible to detect ligands that preferentially stimulate the β-arrestin pathway over the G protein-mediated signal transduction route, or vice versa. This phenomenon is referred to as functional selectivity or biased signaling and implies that an antagonist for one pathway may be a full agonist for the other signaling route. Functional selectivity makes it necessary to redefine the functional properties of currently used adenosine receptor ligands and opens possibilities for new and more selective ligands. This review focuses on the current knowledge of functionally selective adenosine receptor ligands and on G protein-independent signaling of adenosine receptors through scaffold proteins

Different response patterns of several ligands at the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P3)

Recently, some ligands targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P(3)) have become available. The characterization of these compounds was mainly based on one functional read-out system, although S1P(3) receptors are known to activate different signal transduction pathways. Therefore, this study pharmacologically characterizes these compounds using different assays. Using CHO-FlpIn cells expressing the human S1P(3) receptor the potencies and maximal effects of S1P, FTY720-P, VPC23019, VPC23153 and VPC24191 were determined in three different assays [inhibition of cAMP accumulation, elevation of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+](i)) and S1P(3) receptor internalization]. All compounds tested inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, increased [Ca2+](i) and induced S1P(3) receptor internalization but with different potencies and maximal effects. S1P was the most potent compound in all assays followed by FTY720-P. The VPC compounds were generally less potent than S1P and FTY720-P. Regarding the maximal effects, all compounds except VPC23153, behaved as full agonists in the cAMP accumulation assay. In the calcium assay, FTY720-P, VPC23019 and VPC24191 displayed partial and VPC23153 weak partial agonist activity, relative to S1P. Interestingly, treatment with the G(i) inactivator Pertussis toxin, did not affect S1P-induced [Ca2+](i) elevations but inhibited those in response to the other compounds, by about 50%. This study demonstrated differential response patterns at the S1P(3) receptor for a range of ligands. These differences could indicate the presence of functional selectivity at this receptor as FTY720-P and the VPC compounds seemed to signal predominantly via G(i) - whereas S1P activated G(i) and G(q)-coupled pathway

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 controls venous endothelial barrier integrity in Zebrafish

OBJECTIVE: Endothelial sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor-1 (S1P(1)) affects different vascular functions, including blood vessel maturation and permeability. Here, we characterized the role of the zS1P(1) ortholog in vascular development in zebrafish. METHODS AND RESULTS: zS1P(1) is expressed in dorsal aorta and posterior cardinal vein of zebrafish embryos at 24 to 30 hours postfertilization. zS1P(1) downregulation by antisense morpholino oligonucleotide injection causes early pericardial edema, lack of blood circulation, alterations of posterior cardinal vein structure, and late generalized edema. Also, zS1P(1) morphants are characterized by downregulation of vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) and Eph receptor EphB4a expression and by disorganization of zonula occludens 1 junctions in posterior cardinal vein endothelium, with no alterations of dorsal aorta endothelium. VE-cadherin knockdown results in similar vascular alterations, whereas VE-cadherin overexpression is sufficient to rescue venous vascular integrity defects and EphB4a downregulation in zS1P(1) morphants. Finally, S1P(1) small interfering RNA transfection and the S1P(1) antagonist (R)-3-amino-(3-hexylphenylamino)-4-oxobutylphosphonic acid (W146) cause EPHB4 receptor down-modulation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and the assembly of zonula occludens 1 intercellular contacts is prevented by the EPHB4 antagonist TNYL-RAW peptide in these cells. CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate a nonredundant role of zS1P(1) in the regulation of venous endothelial barrier in zebrafish and identify a S1P(1)/VE-cadherin/EphB4a genetic pathway that controls venous vascular integrity