17 research outputs found

    Eyes or subjects: Are ophthalmic randomized controlled trials properly designed and analyzed?

    No full text
    Objective: In ophthalmic randomized controlled trials (RCTs), each subject may have 2 potential data points (i.e., eyes) contributing to the clinical trial. Hence, various study designs may arise requiring different statistical tools. This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of study design, statistical tools used, and reporting of results in ophthalmic RCTs. Design: A systematic review of 69 ophthalmic RCTs. Methods: The study design, sample size calculation, statistical analysis, and reporting methodology of all RCTs published in 4 major general clinical ophthalmology journals in 2009 were assessed. Main Outcome Measures: The study design of each article under review is evaluated. Results: The most common study design was a one-eye design (48%). Within this group, only half described the method of selecting the study eye, among which 5 chose the study eye by random selection. In the remaining trials, there were paired-eye design (13%), subject design (19%), and two-eye design (19%). Among the 13 two-eye design studies, 4 allocated both eyes of the subject to the same group, 4 allocated the eyes to different groups, and 4 did not restrict the allocation. None of these studies adjusted for the clustering effect in sample size calculation. Only 5 studies used statistical methods adjusting for nonindependence. Conclusions: There is currently substantial heterogeneity in the quality among published ophthalmic RCTs in terms of proper use of study design, sample size calculation, randomization method, and statistical tools. Future ophthalmic researchers are suggested to consult a statistician and to follow some guidelines such as the CONSORT statement when performing an RCT to improve further the quality of clinical trial. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

    Structure-activity relationship of new antimalarial 1-aryl-3-susbtituted propanol derivatives: Synthesis, preliminary toxicity profiling, parasite life cycle stage studies, target exploration, and targeted delivery

    No full text
    International audienceDesign, synthesis, structure-activity relationship, cytotoxicity studies, in silico drug-likeness, genotoxicity screening, and in vivo studies of new 1-aryl-3-substituted propanol derivatives led to the identification of nine compounds with promising in vitro (55, 56, 61, 64, 66, and 70-73) and in vivo (66 and 72) antimalarial profiles against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei. Compounds 55, 56, 61, 64, 66 and 70-73 exhibited potent antiplasmodial activity against chloroquine-resistant strain FCR-3 (IC50s < 0.28 μM), and compounds 55, 56, 64, 70, 71, and 72 showed potent biological activity in chloroquine-sensitive and multidrug-resistant strains (IC50s < 0.7 μM for 3D7, D6, FCR-3 and C235). All of these compounds share appropriate drug-likeness profiles and adequate selectivity indexes (77 < SI < 184) as well as lack genotoxicity. In vivo efficacy tests in a mouse model showed compounds 66 and 72 to be promising candidates as they exhibited significant parasitemia reductions of 96.4% and 80.4%, respectively. Additional studies such as liver stage and sporogony inhibition, target exploration of heat shock protein 90 of P. falciparum, targeted delivery by immunoliposomes, and enantiomer characterization were performed and strongly reinforce the hypothesis of 1-aryl-3-substituted propanol derivatives as promising antimalarial compounds

    Plasma total homocysteine and retinal vascular disease

    No full text
    Purpose Hyperhomocysteinaemia has been linked to macrovascular disease. Our aim was to investigate whether there is a relationship between fasting plasma total homocysteine levels and retinal vascular disease
    corecore