7 research outputs found

    RAAS inhibitors are not associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients: Findings from an observational multicenter study in Italy and a meta-analysis of 19 studies

    Get PDF
    Objective: The hypothesis that been set forward that use of Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors is associated with COVID-19 severity. We set-up a multicenter Italian collaboration (CORIST Project, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04318418) to retrospectively investigate the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality. We also carried out an updated meta-analysis on the relevant studies.Methods: We analyzed 4069 unselected patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in 34 clinical centers in Italy from February 19, 2020 to May 23, 2020. The primary end-point in a time-to event analysis was in-hospital death, comparing patients who received angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEeI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) with patients who did not. Articles for the meta-analysis were retrieved until July 13th, 2020 by searching in web-based libraries, and data were combined using the general variance-based method.Results: Out of 4069 COVID-19 patients, 13.5% and 13.3% received ACE-I or ARB, respectively. Use of neither ACE-I nor ARB was associated with mortality (multivariable hazard ratio (HR) adjusted also for COVID-19 treatments: 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.20 and HR = 0.89, 0.67-1.19 for ACE-I and ARB, respectively). Findings were similar restricting the analysis to hypertensive (N = 2057) patients (HR = 1.00, 0.78-1.26 and HR = 0.88, 0.65-1.20) or when ACE-I or ARB were considered as a single group. Results from the meta-analysis (19 studies, 29,057 COVID-19 adult patients, 9700 with hypertension) confirmed the absence of association.Conclusions: In this observational study and meta-analysis of the literature, ACE-I or ARB use was not associated with severity or in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients

    Heparin in COVID-19 Patients Is Associated with Reduced In-Hospital Mortality: The Multicenter Italian CORIST Study *

    No full text
    Introduction A hypercoagulable condition was described in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and proposed as a possible pathogenic mechanism contributing to disease progression and lethality. Aim We evaluated if in-hospital administration of heparin improved survival in a large cohort of Italian COVID-19 patients. Methods In a retrospective observational study, 2,574 unselected patients hospitalized in 30 clinical centers in Italy from February 19, 2020 to June 5, 2020 with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection were analyzed. The primary endpoint in a time-to event analysis was in-hospital death, comparing patients who received heparin (low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH] or unfractionated heparin [UFH]) with patients who did not. We used multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models with inverse probability for treatment weighting by propensity scores. Results Out of 2,574 COVID-19 patients, 70.1% received heparin. LMWH was largely the most used formulation (99.5%). Death rates for patients receiving heparin or not were 7.4 and 14.0 per 1,000 person-days, respectively. After adjustment for propensity scores, we found a 40% lower risk of death in patients receiving heparin (hazard ratio = 0.60; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.74; E-value = 2.04). This association was particularly evident in patients with a higher severity of disease or strong coagulation activation. Conclusion In-hospital heparin treatment was associated with a lower mortality, particularly in severely ill COVID-19 patients and in those with strong coagulation activation. The results from randomized clinical trials are eagerly awaited to provide clear-cut recommendations

    Disentangling the association of hydroxychloroquine treatment with mortality in covid-19 hospitalized patients through hierarchical clustering

    Get PDF
    none111The efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection is harshly debated, with observational and experimental studies reporting contrasting results. To clarify the role of HCQ in Covid-19 patients, we carried out a retrospective observational study of 4,396 unselected patients hospitalized for Covid-19 in Italy (February–May 2020). Patients’ characteristics were collected at entry, including age, sex, obesity, smoking status, blood parameters, history of diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular and chronic pulmonary diseases, and medications in use. These were used to identify subtypes of patients with similar characteristics through hierarchical clustering based on Gower distance. Using multivariable Cox regressions, these clusters were then tested for association with mortality and modification of effect by treatment with HCQ. We identified two clusters, one of 3,913 younger patients with lower circulating inflammation levels and better renal function, and one of 483 generally older and more comorbid subjects, more prevalently men and smokers. The latter group was at increased death risk adjusted by HCQ (HR [CI95%] = 3.80[3.08-4.67]), while HCQ showed an independent inverse association (0.51[0.43-0.61]), as well as a significant influence of cluster∗HCQ interaction (p < 0.001). This was driven by a differential association of HCQ with mortality between the high (0.89[0.65-1.22]) and the low risk cluster (0.46[0.39-0.54]). These effects survived adjustments for additional medications in use and were concordant with associations with disease severity and outcome. These findings suggest a particularly beneficial effect of HCQ within low risk Covid-19 patients and may contribute to clarifying the current controversy on HCQ efficacy in Covid-19 treatment.noneDi Castelnuovo A.; Gialluisi A.; Antinori A.; Berselli N.; Blandi L.; Bonaccio M.; Bruno R.; Cauda R.; Costanzo S.; Guaraldi G.; Menicanti L.; Mennuni M.; My I.; Parruti G.; Patti G.; Perlini S.; Santilli F.; Signorelli C.; Stefanini G.; Vergori A.; Ageno W.; Agodi A.; Agostoni P.; Aiello L.; Moghazi S.A.; Arboretti R.; Aucella F.; Barbieri G.; Barchitta M.; Bonfanti P.; Cacciatore F.; Caiano L.; Cannata F.; Carrozzi L.; Cascio A.; Castiglione G.; Cicullo A.; Cingolani A.; Cipollone F.; Colomba C.; Colombo C.; Crisetti A.; Crosta F.; Danzi G.B.; D'Ardes D.; de Gaetano Donati K.; Di Gennaro F.; Di Tano G.; D'Offizi G.; Fusco F.M.; Gaudiosi C.; Gentile I.; Gianfagna F.; Giuliano G.; Graziani E.; Guarnieri G.; Langella V.; Larizza G.; Leone A.; Maccagni G.; Magni F.; Maitan S.; Mancarella S.; Manuele R.; Mapelli M.; Maragna R.; Marcucci R.; Maresca G.; Marongiu S.; Marotta C.; Marra L.; Mastroianni F.; Mengozzi A.; Meschiari M.; Milic J.; Minutolo F.; Mussinelli R.; Mussini C.; Musso M.; Odone A.; Olivieri M.; Palimodde A.; Pasi E.; Pesavento R.; Petri F.; Pivato C.A.; Poletti V.; Ravaglia C.; Righetti G.; Rognoni A.; Rossato M.; Rossi I.; Rossi M.; Sabena A.; Salinaro F.; Sangiovanni V.; Sanrocco C.; Moriello N.S.; Scorzolini L.; Sgariglia R.; Simeone P.G.; Spinicci M.; Tamburrini E.; Torti C.; Trecarichi E.M.; Vettor R.; Vianello A.; Vinceti M.; Virdis A.; de Caterina R.; Iacoviello L.Di Castelnuovo, A.; Gialluisi, A.; Antinori, A.; Berselli, N.; Blandi, L.; Bonaccio, M.; Bruno, R.; Cauda, R.; Costanzo, S.; Guaraldi, G.; Menicanti, L.; Mennuni, M.; My, I.; Parruti, G.; Patti, G.; Perlini, S.; Santilli, F.; Signorelli, C.; Stefanini, G.; Vergori, A.; Ageno, W.; Agodi, A.; Agostoni, P.; Aiello, L.; Moghazi, S. A.; Arboretti, R.; Aucella, F.; Barbieri, G.; Barchitta, M.; Bonfanti, P.; Cacciatore, F.; Caiano, L.; Cannata, F.; Carrozzi, L.; Cascio, A.; Castiglione, G.; Cicullo, A.; Cingolani, A.; Cipollone, F.; Colomba, C.; Colombo, C.; Crisetti, A.; Crosta, F.; Danzi, G. B.; D'Ardes, D.; de Gaetano Donati, K.; Di Gennaro, F.; Di Tano, G.; D'Offizi, G.; Fusco, F. M.; Gaudiosi, C.; Gentile, I.; Gianfagna, F.; Giuliano, G.; Graziani, E.; Guarnieri, G.; Langella, V.; Larizza, G.; Leone, A.; Maccagni, G.; Magni, F.; Maitan, S.; Mancarella, S.; Manuele, R.; Mapelli, M.; Maragna, R.; Marcucci, R.; Maresca, G.; Marongiu, S.; Marotta, C.; Marra, L.; Mastroianni, F.; Mengozzi, A.; Meschiari, M.; Milic, J.; Minutolo, F.; Mussinelli, R.; Mussini, C.; Musso, M.; Odone, A.; Olivieri, M.; Palimodde, A.; Pasi, E.; Pesavento, R.; Petri, F.; Pivato, C. A.; Poletti, V.; Ravaglia, C.; Righetti, G.; Rognoni, A.; Rossato, M.; Rossi, I.; Rossi, M.; Sabena, A.; Salinaro, F.; Sangiovanni, V.; Sanrocco, C.; Moriello, N. S.; Scorzolini, L.; Sgariglia, R.; Simeone, P. G.; Spinicci, M.; Tamburrini, E.; Torti, C.; Trecarichi, E. M.; Vettor, R.; Vianello, A.; Vinceti, M.; Virdis, A.; de Caterina, R.; Iacoviello, L

    RAAS inhibitors are not associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients: findings from an observational multicenter study in Italy and a meta-analysis of 19 studies

    No full text
    Objective: The hypothesis that been set forward that use of Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors is associated with COVID-19 severity. We set-up a multicenter Italian collaboration (CORIST Project, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04318418) to retrospectively investigate the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality. We also carried out an updated meta-analysis on the relevant studies. Methods: We analyzed 4,069 unselected patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in 34 clinical centers in Italy from February 19, 2020 to May 23, 2020. The primary end-point in a time-to event analysis was in-hospital death, comparing patients who received angiotensin-converting\u2013enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) with patients who did not. Articles for the meta-analysis were retrieved until July 13th, 2020 by searching in web-based libraries, and data were combined using the general variance-based method. Results: Out of 4,069 COVID-19 patients, 13.5% and 13.3% received ACE-I or ARB, respectively. Use of neither ACE-I nor ARB was associated with mortality (multivariable hazard ratio (HR) adjusted also for COVID-19 treatments: 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.20 and HR=0.89, 0.67-1.19 for ACE-I and ARB, respectively). Findings were similar restricting the analysis to hypertensive (N=2,057) patients (HR=1.00, 0.78-1.26 and HR=0.88, 0.65-1.20) or when ACE-I or ARB were considered as a single group. Results from the meta-analysis (19 studies, 29,057 COVID-19 adult patients, 9,700 with hypertension) confirmed the absence of association. Conclusions: In this observational study and meta-analysis of the literature, ACE-I or ARB use was not associated with severity or in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients

    RAAS inhibitors are not associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients: Findings from an observational multicenter study in Italy and a meta-analysis of 19 studies

    No full text
    none109Objective: The hypothesis that been set forward that use of Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors is associated with COVID−19 severity. We set-up a multicenter Italian collaboration (CORIST Project, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04318418) to retrospectively investigate the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and COVID−19 in-hospital mortality. We also carried out an updated meta-analysis on the relevant studies. Methods: We analyzed 4069 unselected patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in 34 clinical centers in Italy from February 19, 2020 to May 23, 2020. The primary end-point in a time-to event analysis was in-hospital death, comparing patients who received angiotensin-converting–enzyme inhibitors (ACE[sbnd]I) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) with patients who did not. Articles for the meta-analysis were retrieved until July 13th, 2020 by searching in web-based libraries, and data were combined using the general variance-based method. Results: Out of 4069 COVID−19 patients, 13.5% and 13.3% received ACE-I or ARB, respectively. Use of neither ACE-I nor ARB was associated with mortality (multivariable hazard ratio (HR) adjusted also for COVID−19 treatments: 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.77–1.20 and HR = 0.89, 0.67–1.19 for ACE-I and ARB, respectively). Findings were similar restricting the analysis to hypertensive (N = 2057) patients (HR = 1.00, 0.78–1.26 and HR = 0.88, 0.65–1.20) or when ACE-I or ARB were considered as a single group. Results from the meta-analysis (19 studies, 29,057 COVID−19 adult patients, 9700 with hypertension) confirmed the absence of association. Conclusions: In this observational study and meta-analysis of the literature, ACE-I or ARB use was not associated with severity or in-hospital mortality in COVID−19 patients.noneDi Castelnuovo A.; Costanzo S.; Antinori A.; Berselli N.; Blandi L.; Bonaccio M.; Cauda R.; Gialluisi A.; Guaraldi G.; Menicanti L.; Mennuni M.; Mussinelli R.; My I.; Parruti G.; Patti G.; Perlini S.; Santilli F.; Signorelli C.; Stefanini G.G.; Vergori A.; Abete P.; Ageno W.; Agostoni P.; Aiello L.; Al Moghazi S.; Arboretti R.; Aucella F.; Barbieri G.; Barchitta M.; Bartoloni A.; Bonfanti P.; Cacciatore F.; Caiano L.; Carrozzi L.; Cascio A.; Castiglione G.; Cianfrone S.; Ciccullo A.; Cingolani A.; Cipollone F.; Colomba C.; Colombo C.; Cozzi O.; Crisetti A.; Crosta F.; Danzi G.B.; D'Ardes D.; de Gaetano Donati K.; Di Gennaro F.; Di Tano G.; D'Offizi G.; Fusco F.M.; Gentile I.; Graziani E.; Guarnieri G.; Larizza G.; Leone A.; Lio V.; Lucia M.B.; Maccagni G.; Madaro F.; Maitan S.; Mancarella S.; Manuele R.; Mapelli M.; Maragna R.; Marcucci R.; Maresca G.; Marongiu S.; Marotta C.; Marra L.; Mastroianni F.; Mazzitelli M.; Mengozzi A.; Menichetti F.; Meschiari M.; Milic J.; Minutolo F.; Molena B.; Mussini C.; Musso M.; Odone A.; Olivieri M.; Palimodde A.; Pasi E.; Pesavento R.; Petri F.; Pinchera B.; Pivato C.A.; Poletti V.; Ravaglia C.; Rossato M.; Rossi M.; Sabena A.; Salinaro F.; Sangiovanni V.; Sanrocco C.; Scoppettuolo G.; Scorzolini L.; Sgariglia R.; Simeone P.G.; Trecarichi E.M.; Vettor R.; Vianello A.; Vinceti M.; Virano A.; Vocciante L.; De Caterina R.; Iacoviello L.Di Castelnuovo, A.; Costanzo, S.; Antinori, A.; Berselli, N.; Blandi, L.; Bonaccio, M.; Cauda, R.; Gialluisi, A.; Guaraldi, G.; Menicanti, L.; Mennuni, M.; Mussinelli, R.; My, I.; Parruti, G.; Patti, G.; Perlini, S.; Santilli, F.; Signorelli, C.; Stefanini, G. G.; Vergori, A.; Abete, P.; Ageno, W.; Agostoni, P.; Aiello, L.; Al Moghazi, S.; Arboretti, R.; Aucella, F.; Barbieri, G.; Barchitta, M.; Bartoloni, A.; Bonfanti, P.; Cacciatore, F.; Caiano, L.; Carrozzi, L.; Cascio, A.; Castiglione, G.; Cianfrone, S.; Ciccullo, A.; Cingolani, A.; Cipollone, F.; Colomba, C.; Colombo, C.; Cozzi, O.; Crisetti, A.; Crosta, F.; Danzi, G. B.; D'Ardes, D.; de Gaetano Donati, K.; Di Gennaro, F.; Di Tano, G.; D'Offizi, G.; Fusco, F. M.; Gentile, I.; Graziani, E.; Guarnieri, G.; Larizza, G.; Leone, A.; Lio, V.; Lucia, M. B.; Maccagni, G.; Madaro, F.; Maitan, S.; Mancarella, S.; Manuele, R.; Mapelli, M.; Maragna, R.; Marcucci, R.; Maresca, G.; Marongiu, S.; Marotta, C.; Marra, L.; Mastroianni, F.; Mazzitelli, M.; Mengozzi, A.; Menichetti, F.; Meschiari, M.; Milic, J.; Minutolo, F.; Molena, B.; Mussini, C.; Musso, M.; Odone, A.; Olivieri, M.; Palimodde, A.; Pasi, E.; Pesavento, R.; Petri, F.; Pinchera, B.; Pivato, C. A.; Poletti, V.; Ravaglia, C.; Rossato, M.; Rossi, M.; Sabena, A.; Salinaro, F.; Sangiovanni, V.; Sanrocco, C.; Scoppettuolo, G.; Scorzolini, L.; Sgariglia, R.; Simeone, P. G.; Trecarichi, E. M.; Vettor, R.; Vianello, A.; Vinceti, M.; Virano, A.; Vocciante, L.; De Caterina, R.; Iacoviello, L

    Disentangling the Association of Hydroxychloroquine Treatment with Mortality in Covid-19 Hospitalized Patients through Hierarchical Clustering

    No full text
    The efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection is harshly debated, with observational and experimental studies reporting contrasting results. To clarify the role of HCQ in Covid-19 patients, we carried out a retrospective observational study of 4,396 unselected patients hospitalized for Covid-19 in Italy (February-May 2020). Patients' characteristics were collected at entry, including age, sex, obesity, smoking status, blood parameters, history of diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular and chronic pulmonary diseases, and medications in use. These were used to identify subtypes of patients with similar characteristics through hierarchical clustering based on Gower distance. Using multivariable Cox regressions, these clusters were then tested for association with mortality and modification of effect by treatment with HCQ. We identified two clusters, one of 3,913 younger patients with lower circulating inflammation levels and better renal function, and one of 483 generally older and more comorbid subjects, more prevalently men and smokers. The latter group was at increased death risk adjusted by HCQ (HR[CI95%] = 3.80[3.08-4.67]), while HCQ showed an independent inverse association (0.51[0.43-0.61]), as well as a significant influence of cluster*HCQ interaction (p<0.001). This was driven by a differential association of HCQ with mortality between the high (0.89[0.65-1.22]) and the low risk cluster (0.46[0.39-0.54]). These effects survived adjustments for additional medications in use and were concordant with associations with disease severity and outcome. These findings suggest a particularly beneficial effect of HCQ within low risk Covid-19 patients and may contribute to clarifying the current controversy on HCQ efficacy in Covid-19 treatment

    RAAS inhibitors are not associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients: Findings from an observational multicenter study in Italy and a meta-analysis of 19 studies

    Get PDF
    Objective: The hypothesis that been set forward that use of Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS) inhibitors is associated with COVID-19 severity. We set-up a multicenter Italian collaboration (CORIST Project, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04318418) to retrospectively investigate the relationship between RAAS inhibitors and COVID-19 in-hospital mortality. We also carried out an updated meta-analysis on the relevant studies.Methods: We analyzed 4069 unselected patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in 34 clinical centers in Italy from February 19, 2020 to May 23, 2020. The primary end-point in a time-to event analysis was in-hospital death, comparing patients who received angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEeI) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) with patients who did not. Articles for the meta-analysis were retrieved until July 13th, 2020 by searching in web-based libraries, and data were combined using the general variance-based method.Results: Out of 4069 COVID-19 patients, 13.5% and 13.3% received ACE-I or ARB, respectively. Use of neither ACE-I nor ARB was associated with mortality (multivariable hazard ratio (HR) adjusted also for COVID-19 treatments: 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.77-1.20 and HR = 0.89, 0.67-1.19 for ACE-I and ARB, respectively). Findings were similar restricting the analysis to hypertensive (N = 2057) patients (HR = 1.00, 0.78-1.26 and HR = 0.88, 0.65-1.20) or when ACE-I or ARB were considered as a single group. Results from the meta-analysis (19 studies, 29,057 COVID-19 adult patients, 9700 with hypertension) confirmed the absence of association.Conclusions: In this observational study and meta-analysis of the literature, ACE-I or ARB use was not associated with severity or in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients
    corecore