PFOLFIRINOX as induction treatment in rectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases (RCSM): Final results of the FFCD 1102 phase II trial

IF 11.855International audienc

FOLFIRINOX as induction treatment in rectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases: Results of the FFCD 1102 phase II trial

IF 7.191 (2017)International audienceAim of the studyThe optimal therapeutic strategy in patients with rectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases remains unknown. We evaluated the efficacy of FOLFIRINOX induction therapy in this setting.Patients and methodsChemotherapy-naïve patients received at least 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX. The primary end-point was the 4-month disease control (4 m DC) rate. Tumour responses were centrally reviewed and assessed by computed tomography scan for metastases (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours criteria) and magnetic resonance imaging for rectal tumorus. With a Simon 2-stage design and a targeted (H1) 4 m DC > 75%, 65 patients were enrolled from July 2012 to February 2015: male, 78%; median age, 61 years; performance status, 0–1, 98%; liver metastases, 92%; ≥2 metastatic sites, 63%.ResultsFifty-six (85%) of the 65 patients received the 8 planned FOLFIRINOX cycles. The primary objective was achieved (4 m DC rate: 94%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3–97.8). Primary tumour symptoms decreased from 72% at baseline to 10% at 4 months. Response rate was 86%, and a >70% primary tumour volume decrease was seen in 63% of patients. Forty-four patients (68%) had at least one grade 3 side-effect; no toxic deaths occurred.Median follow-up was 35.0 months (95% CI, 31.3–43.7). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.9 m (95% CI, 8.8–12.9) and 33.4 m (95% CI, 22.6–38.2), respectively.ConclusionUpfront FOLFIRINOX is feasible and allows good local and distant control. It therefore offers the opportunity to choose the best therapeutic strategy for each patient and to personalise treatment according to the local and distant efficacy results of this induction step.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT01674309

Poorly differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: Are they really heterogeneous? Insights from the FFCD-GTE national cohort.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) remain challenging. Recent studies suggest prognostic heterogeneity. We designed within the French Group of Endocrine Tumours a prospective cohort to gain insight in the prognostic stratification and treatment of GEP-NEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with a diagnosis of GEP-NEC between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2013 could be included in this national cohort. Adenoneuroendocrine tumours were excluded. RESULTS: 253 patients from 49 centres were included. Median age was 66 years. Main primary locations were pancreas (21%), colorectal (27%), oesophagus-stomach (18%); primary location was unknown in 20%. Tumours were metastatic at diagnosis in 78% of cases. Performance status (PS) at diagnosis was 0-1 in 79% of patients. Among the 147 (58%) cases reviewed by an expert pathological network, 39% were classified as small cell NEC and 61% as large cell NEC. Median Ki67 index was 75% (range, 20-100). Median overall survival was 15.6 (13.6-17.0) months. Significant adverse prognostic factors in univariate analysis were PS > 1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5), metastatic disease (HR = 1.6), NSE>2 upper limit of normal [ULN]; HR = 3.2), CgA>2 ULN (HR = 1.7) and lactate dehydrogenase >2 ULN (HR = 2.1). After first-line palliative chemotherapy (CT1) with platinum-etoposide (n = 152), objective response, progression-free survival and overall survival were 50%, 6.2 and 11.6 months; they were 24%, 2.9 and 5.9, respectively, after post-CT1 FOLFIRI regimen (n = 72). CONCLUSIONS: We report a large prospective series of GEP-NEC which show the predominance of large cell type and advanced stage at diagnosis. Prognosis was found more homogeneous than previously reported, mainly impacted by PS and tumour burden

Quand perte de sens rime avec souffrance : analyse qualitative du vécu des médecins à l’annonce d’une mauvaise nouvelle en oncologie

International audienceThe aim of this study is to explore physicians’ subjective experience when breaking bad news in oncology. This study is based on a qualitative analysis (Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis) of 22 interviews of physicians working in hospitals. The analysis shows that the meaning that physicians give to the announcement and their role was a decisive element on their emotional experience of the announcement. These results present new elements of our understanding of physicians’ experience when breaking bad news in oncology, which should be integrated into physicians’ training.Cette étude vise à explorer l’expérience subjective des médecins confrontés à l’annonce de mauvaises nouvelles en cancérologie. Elle repose sur l’analyse qualitative (Analyse interprétative phénoménologique) de 22 entretiens menés auprès de médecins hospitaliers. Cette analyse révèle que le sens que les médecins donnent à l’annonce et à leur rôle est déterminant dans leur vécu émotionnel de l’annonce. Ces résultats amènent de nouveaux éléments de compréhension du vécu des médecins à l’annonce d’une mauvaise nouvelle en cancérologie à intégrer aux formations des médecins

Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer: Main analysis of second progression-free survival in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial.

PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer. We report the prespecified main second progression-free survival (PFS2) analysis for PAOLA-1. This randomised, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade ovarian cancer and were in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients were randomised 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo for up to 24 months; all patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for up to 15 months. Primary PFS end-point was reported previously. Time from randomisation to second disease progression or death was a key secondary end-point included in the hierarchical-testing procedure. After a median follow-up of 35.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively, median PFS2 was 36.5 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 32.6 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.95; P = 0.0125. Median time to second subsequent therapy or death was 38.2 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 31.5 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.95; P = 0.0115. Seventy-two (27%) patients in the placebo plus bevacizumab group received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor as first subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed for olaparib plus bevacizumab. In newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided continued benefit beyond first progression, with a significant PFS2 improvement and a time to second subsequent therapy or death delay versus placebo plus bevacizumab