Effectiveness of Statins as Primary Prevention in People With Different Cardiovascular Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study

The purpose was to analyze statin effectiveness in a general population with differing levels of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Patients (35-74 years) without previous cardiovascular disease were included and stratified according to 10-year CHD risk ( < 5%, 5-7.4%, 7.5-9.9%, and 10-19.9%). New users were categorized according to their medical possession ratio (MPR). The main outcome was atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke). In adherent patients (MPR 70%), statin treatment decreased ASCVD risk across the range of coronary risk (from 16-30%). The 5-year number needed to treat (NNT) was 470 and 204 in the risk categories < 5% and 5-7.4%, respectively, and 75 and 62 in the 7.5-9.9% category than in the 10-19.9% category, respectively. Statin therapy should remain a priority in patients at high 10-year CHD risk (10-19.9%). Most patients with intermediate risk could benefit from statin treatment, but the treatment decision should focus on the net benefit, safety, and patient preference, given the higher NNT

Improving interMediAte Risk management. MARK study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cardiovascular risk functions fail to identify more than 50% of patients who develop cardiovascular disease. This is especially evident in the intermediate-risk patients in which clinical management becomes difficult. Our purpose is to analyze if ankle-brachial index (ABI), measures of arterial stiffness, postprandial glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, self-measured blood pressure and presence of comorbidity are independently associated to incidence of vascular events and whether they can improve the predictive capacity of current risk equations in the intermediate-risk population.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>This project involves 3 groups belonging to REDIAPP (RETICS RD06/0018) from 3 Spanish regions. We will recruit a multicenter cohort of 2688 patients at intermediate risk (coronary risk between 5 and 15% or vascular death risk between 3-5% over 10 years) and no history of atherosclerotic disease, selected at random. We will record socio-demographic data, information on diet, physical activity, comorbidity and intermittent claudication. We will measure ABI, pulse wave velocity and cardio ankle vascular index at rest and after a light intensity exercise. Blood pressure and anthropometric data will be also recorded. We will also quantify lipids, glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin in a fasting blood sample and postprandial capillary glucose. Eighteen months after the recruitment, patients will be followed up to determine the incidence of vascular events (later follow-ups are planned at 5 and 10 years). We will analyze whether the new proposed risk factors contribute to improve the risk functions based on classic risk factors.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases is a priority in public health policy of developed and developing countries. The fundamental strategy consists in identifying people in a high risk situation in which preventive measures are effective and efficient. Improvement of these predictions in our country will have an immediate, clinical and welfare impact and a short term public health effect.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01428934">NCT01428934</a></p

Epidemiology of dementia: prevalence and incidence estimates using validated electronic health records from primary care

Anna Ponjoan,1&ndash;3 Josep Garre-Olmo,2 Jordi Blanch,1 Ester Fages,1 Lia Alves-Cabratosa,1 Ruth Mart&iacute;-Lluch,1&ndash;3 Marc Comas-Cuf&iacute;,1 D&iacute;dac Parramon,1,4 Mar&iacute;a Garcia-Gil,1 Rafel Ramos1,5 1Vascular Health Research Group (ISV-Girona), Jordi Gol Institute for Primary Care Research (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; 2Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Catalonia, Spain; 3Santa Clara Primary Care Health Center, Catalan Health Institute, Girona, Catalonia, Spain; 4Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vall&egrave;s), Catalonia, Spain; 5Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Campus Salut, University of Girona, Girona, Catalonia, Spain Purpose: Updated estimates of incidence and prevalence of dementia are crucial to ensure adequate public health policy. However, most of the epidemiological studies in the population in Spain were conducted before 2010. This study assessed the validity of dementia diagnoses recorded in electronic health records contained in a large primary-care database to determine if they could be used for research purposes. Then, to update the epidemiology of dementia in Catalonia (Spain), we estimated crude and standardized prevalence and incidence rates of dementia in Catalonia in 2016. Methods: The System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) database contains anonymized information for &gt;80% of the Catalan population. Validity of dementia codes in SIDIAP was assessed in patients at least 40 years old by asking general practitioners for additional evidence to support the diagnosis. Crude and standardized incidence and prevalence (95% CI) in people aged &ge;65 years were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution. Results: The positive predictive value of dementia diagnoses recorded in SIDIAP was estimated as 91.0% (95% CI 87.5%&ndash;94.5%). Age- and sex-standardized incidence and prevalence of dementia were 8.6/1,000 person-years (95% CI 8.0&ndash;9.3) and 5.1% (95% CI 4.5%&ndash;5.7%), respectively. Conclusion: SIDIAP contains valid dementia records. We observed incidence and prevalence estimations similar to recent face-to-face studies conducted in Spain and higher than studies using electronic health data from other European populations. Keywords: family physician, accuracy, quality, positive predictive value, electronic medical record, real-world dat

What outcomes are important to patients with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer’s disease, their caregivers, and health-care professionals? A systematic review

Introduction: Clinical trials involving patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continue to try to identify disease-modifying treatments. Although trials are designed to meet regulatory and registration requirements, many do not measure outcomes of the disease most relevant to key stakeholders. Methods: A systematic review sought research that elicited information from people with AD, their caregivers, and health-care professionals on which outcomes of the disease were important. Studies published in any language between 2008 and 2017 were included. Results: Participants in 34 studies described 32 outcomes of AD. These included clinical (memory, mental health), practical (ability to undertake activities of daily living, access to health information), and personal (desire for patient autonomy, maintenance of identity) outcomes of the disease. Discussion: Evidence elicited directly from the people most affected by AD reveals a range of disease outcomes that are relevant to them but are not commonly captured in clinical trials of new treatments.</br

Real-world evidence in Alzheimer's disease: The ROADMAP Data Cube

INTRODUCTION:The ROADMAP project aimed to provide an integrated overview of European real-world data on Alzheimer's disease (AD) across the disease spectrum. METHODS:Metadata were identified from data sources in catalogs of European AD projects. Priority outcomes for different stakeholders were identified through systematic literature review, patient and public consultations, and stakeholder surveys. RESULTS:Information about 66 data sources and 13 outcome domains were integrated into a Data Cube. Gap analysis identified cognitive ability, functional ability/independence, behavioral/neuropsychiatric symptoms, treatment, comorbidities, and mortality as the outcomes collected most. Data were most lacking in caregiver-related outcomes. In general, electronic health records covered a broader, less detailed data spectrum than research cohorts. DISCUSSION:This integrated real-world AD data overview provides an intuitive visual model that facilitates initial assessment and identification of gaps in relevant outcomes data to inform future prospective data collection and matching of data sources and outcomes against research protocols