Kinetic Analysis of Cellulose Acetate/Cellulose II Hybrid Fiber Formation by Alkaline Hydrolysis

Cellulose acetate (CA) can be converted to cellulose II through a deacetylation process using ethanolic NaOH solution. Infrared spectroscopy was used to observe the degree of acetylation by comparing the absorption intensities of C═O and C–O stretches. Attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) analysis, which only measures a few microns into the fiber diameter, was compared with FTIR, which measures the whole fiber cross-section. Steady deacetylation of the whole fiber over 180 min was observed with FTIR to eventual complete deacetylation. In comparison, ATR-FTIR shows deacetylation occurring more rapidly to complete deacetylation after 90 min, indicating rapid deacetylation of the CA fiber periphery. Data were fitted to a pseudo-second order kinetic model, with high correlation (R² > 0.99), and it was observed that the deacetylation rate (k₂) observed with ATR-FTIR (−0.634 min⁻¹) was twice as rapid as the deacetylation rate observed with FTIR (−0.315 min⁻¹). IR observations were in agreement with the analysis of fiber cross-sections by confocal microscopy, where it was observed that changes in fiber morphology occurred with treatment time and progressive hydrolysis of cellulose acetate to cellulose II. A differential fiber chemical composition was created within the CA fiber cross-section; after 5 min, the outer regions of the fiber cross-section are hydrolyzed to cellulose II and this hydrolysis increases heterogeneously with time to complete hydrolysis after 180 min and conversion to cellulose II. These results indicate the potential to produce fibers with a differential periphery/core structure, which can be accurately designed according to the relative degrees of cellulose II/CA required for specific applications by varying the treatment time in application of this model

Impact of Tillage Methods on Environment, Energy and Economy

ISSN 2210-4410, eISBN 9783319990767Soil tillage involves the mechanical manipulation of soils used for crop production. Tillage is done to prepare an optimal seedbed, to loosen compacted soil layers, to control weeds, to increase aeration, to incorporate plant residues into the soil, to facilitate water infiltration and soil moisture storage, and to control soil temperature. Nonetheless, soil tillage is one of the highest energy-consuming, environment-polluting and expensive technological processes in agriculture. Conventional tillage with ploughing is the most widely used practice. Conventional tillage has low efficiency, requires high-powered tractors with high fuel consumption and greenhouse gases emissions. Moreover, the cost of conventional tillage is high, and the influence on the soil structure, degradation, leaching of nutrients and the most fertile soil is negative. Here we review the impact of tillage methods on soil quality, environment and economy. Due to the disadvantages of conventional tillage, sustainable tillage area increases each year by 4-6 million ha worldwide. Under sustainable tillage such as minimal or no-tillage, the total soil surface modified by the wheels of agricultural machinery is 20-40% lower than for conventional tillage. Sustainable tillage preserves better soil physical properties and biological processes. A comparison of tillage methods show that no-tillage has the highest energy efficiency ratio of 14.0, versus 12.4 for deep ploughing. The most expensive tillage operation is deep ploughing. The use of agricultural machinery under sustainable tillage conditions and preparation of soils without using a plough can reduce costs from 25% to 41%, compared with conventional tillageVytauto Didžiojo universitetasŽemės ūkio akademij