Epidemiological characteristics of infections caused by Bacteroides, Prevotella and Fusobacterium species: A prospective observational study

In order to investigate differences among infections due to Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria (Bacteroides, Prevotella and Fusobacterium spp.), clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological data were collected and evaluated from 206 anaerobic infections. The most frequently isolated species was Bacteroides fragilis. The majority of the cases were intra-abdominal infections (49%) followed by skin and soft tissue infections (24.7%). Logistic regression analysis showed that Bacteroides spp. strains were more often isolated from intra-abdominal infections (p = 0.002), whereas Prevotella spp. were isolated more frequently from cases with shorter duration of hospitalization (p = 0.026), and less frequently from bloodstream infections (p = 0.049). In addition, Bacteroides spp. were associated with coinfection due to Enterobacteriaceae species (p = 0.007), whereas Prevotella spp. were associated with coinfection due to Staphylococcus spp. (p = 0.002). Patients with an infection due to B. fragilis, were more frequently admitted in a general surgical ward (p = 0.017), or have been treated with a 2nd generation cephalosporin before anaerobic infection onset (p = 0.05). Total mortality was 10.9% and was associated with bacteremia (p = 0.026), and hematological (p = 0.028), or solid organ malignancy (p = 0.007). Metronidazole resistance was detected only among Prevotella spp. (16.2%) and B. fragilis group (0.8%) isolates. In conclusion, this study indicated differences between infections due to the most frequently isolated Gram-negative anaerobic species, differences that may affect the design and implementation of empirical antimicrobial chemotherapy guidelines. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd

Risk factors for coexistence of fluoroquinolone resistance and ESBL production among Enterobacteriaceae in a Greek University Hospital

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance (QR) among ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae causing nosocomial infections. The study was conducted in Laikon General Hospital in Athens, Greece, during the period January 2004 - January 2005. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected from the medical charts of the patients diagnosed with nosocomial infections due to an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. QR was 60% among the 84 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Infection from QR-ESBL bacteria was associated with increased hospital stay (p=0.028); QR-ESBL bacteria were isolated later during hospitalization than fluoroquinolone susceptible (QS)-ESBL (p=0.089); factors associated with QR were immune-deficiency (p=0.047), previous use of carbapenems (p=0.08) and fluoroquinolones (p=0.067), and admission to the Transplantation Unit (p=0.047). In addition, QR-ESBL bacteria were more likely to be resistant to co-trimoxazole (p<0.001), gentamicin (p=0.054) and tobramycin (p=0.004). Logistic regression analysis indicated that admission to the transplantation unit was an independent risk factor for infection due to a QR-ESBL isolate. Results of this study question ciprofloxacin's usefulness as a valid alternative to carbapenems in our hospital for the treatment of infections due to ESBL-producing bacteria. In addition strategies for addressing the QR-ESBL situation should focus on limiting fluoroquinolone and carbapenem consumption and emphasize on barrier precautions in patients with longer hospitalization, immunosuppression, or admission to the transplantation unit. © E.S.I.F.T. srl - Firenze

Moxifloxacin resistance is prevalent among Bacteroides and Prevotella species in Greece

Objectives: Moxifloxacin is recommended in the empirical treatment of infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes. However, current European data regarding its activity against anaerobic pathogens are limited. In order to evaluate its potency, we comparatively studied the activity of moxifloxacin against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobes. Methods: Four hundred and ninety-five Gram-negative anaerobic clinical isolates (296 Bacteroides fragilis group, 58 non- fragilis Bacteroides spp. and 141 Prevotella spp.) were prospectively recovered in six Greek hospitals. Moxifloxacin MICs were determined in comparison with those of penicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, imipenem, metronidazole and clindamycin. Results: Overall moxifloxacin MIC50 and MIC90 were 2 and 32 mg/L, respectively. Based on the current CLSI breakpoints (susceptible, ≤2 mg/L; resistant, ≥8 mg/L), almost half of the total isolates (49%) were non-susceptible to moxifloxacin (32% resistant; 17% intermediate). This was more evident among the non- fragilis Bacteroides species, where 47% of the isolates were resistant and 14% intermediate to moxifloxacin. Species variation was noticed, with the highest non-susceptible rates detected among Prevotella oralis (90%), Prevotella bivia (80%), Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron (75%), Bacteroides uniformis (70%) and Bacteroides capillosus (67%) species. Among the 19 (4%) isolates that were metronidazole non-susceptible (MIC ≥ 16 mg/L), only 4 (21%) were additionally non-susceptible to moxifloxacin. Conclusions: High resistance rates to moxifloxacin among Bacteroides and Prevotella spp. were recorded, exceeding those previously reported in Europe and contraindicating its use as monotherapy for infections involving Gram-negative anaerobes without prior microbiological confirmation. For empirical usage, moxifloxacin should be combined with metronidazole in order to cover for these pathogens. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved

Two cases of infections due to multidrug-resistant Bacteroides fragilis group strains

Bacteroides fragilis group strains are still considered susceptible to most antimicrobial agents used for the treatment of infections caused by anaerobic organisms. We describe two cases of infections due to isolates simultaneously resistant to clindamycin, tetracycline, cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem and, in one of the two cases, to metronidazole. Such infections, although still rare, do exist and tend to complicate treatment. Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved

Multicentre survey of the in-vitro activity of seven antimicrobial agents, including ertapenem, against recently isolated Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria in Greece

The in-vitro activities of penicillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, imipenem, ertapenem, metronidazole and clindamycin were evaluated against 138 Gram-negative anaerobic isolates (82 Bacteroides fragilis group, 17 non-fragilis Bacteroides spp., 31 Prevotella spp., four Fusobacterium spp., two Veillonella spp., one Porphyromonas sp. and one Tissierella praeacuta) collected from six general hospitals in Athens, Greece. Overall rates of non-susceptibility (both resistant and intermediately-resistant) to penicillin and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid were 81.8% and 2.3%, respectively. The rates of non-susceptibility to cefoxitin and clindamycin were 30.3% and 31.1%, respectively, and that for metronidazole was 4.3% (four Prevotella spp. isolates, one Porphyromonas sp. isolate and one B. fragilis isolate). Only the single B. fragilis isolate was nim-positive by PCR. Only one B. fragilis isolate was resistant to both carbapenems tested, while six more Bacteroides spp. isolates were imipenem-susceptible and ertapenem-non-susceptible. The MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 values were comparable for imipenem and ertapenem, although ertapenem MIC(90)s were one or two two-fold dilutions higher