July 4, 1954, Cleveland Police Report, Detectives Gareau and Schottke arrive at the murder scene at 8:05am

At 8:05am on July 4th, 1954, Detectives Gareau and Schottke were assigned to assist the Bay Village Police Department with the Marilyn Sheppard murder investigation. In this report they describe the murder room and the rest of the Sheppard home as well as their interview with Sam Sheppard after he was taken to Bay View Hospital

Cleveland Police Report, November 10, 1954, describing Lester Hoverstein\u27s recollection of his visit with Sam in Bay View Hospital on July 5th, 1954

On November 10, 1954, Officer Gareau picked up Dr. Lester Hoverston at the airport. Hoverston described his visit to Sam on July 5th, 1954 at Bay View Hospital. Dr. Steven Sheppard was also in the room and, according to Hoverston, said to Sam You should review in your mind several times during the day, the sequence of events as they happen{ed} so that when you will be questioned, you will have your story straight

July 4, 1954, Cleveland Police Report, Detectives Gareau and Schottke arrive at the murder scene at 8:05am

At 8:05am on July 4th, 1954, Detectives Gareau and Schottke were assigned to assist the Bay Village Police Department with the Marilyn Sheppard murder investigation. In this report they describe the murder room and the rest of the Sheppard home as well as their interview with Sam Sheppard after he was taken to Bay View Hospital

Cleveland Police Report, December 11, 1954 describing Bay View Hospital worker Donna Bailey\u27s opening of a love letter from Susan to Sam

In the Spring of 1954, Donna Bailey, Bay View Hospital employee, accidentally opened a letter from Susan Hayes to Samuel Sheppard. The testimony of her husband, Robert Bailey\u27s regarding this letter was allowed by Judge Ronald Suster in the 2000 trial (read here Suster\u27s Memorandum Opinion

Cleveland Police Report, December 11, 1954 describing Bay View Hospital worker Donna Bailey\u27s opening of a love letter from Susan to Sam

In the Spring of 1954, Donna Bailey, Bay View Hospital employee, accidentally opened a letter from Susan Hayes to Samuel Sheppard. The testimony of her husband, Robert Bailey\u27s regarding this letter was allowed by Judge Ronald Suster in the 2000 trial (read here Suster\u27s Memorandum Opinion

Defendant\u27s Exhibit 708: Cleveland Police Dept Report

Cleveland Police Report re: Alex Kiralyhttps://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/defendant_exhibits_2000/1051/thumbnail.jp

Electronic Waste Recycling and Disposal: An Overview

Electronic waste, or e-waste, is said to be the fastest growing stream of hazardous waste in the world. E-waste is comprised of a variety of inputs including hazardous materials, potentially valuable and recyclable materials, and other inputs. E-waste follows a range of pathways after disposal, including formal and informal recycling, storage, and dumping, in both developed and less-developed country contexts. Globally, the handling and regulation of e-waste as both a hazardous waste stream and as a source of secondary raw materials has undergone significant changes in the past decade. A growing number of countries have adopted extended producer responsibility laws, which mandate electronics manufacturers to pay for proper recycling and disposal of electronics. The e-waste recycling industry is becoming more formalized as the potential to recover valuable materials has increased, but a range of recent studies have shown that e-waste recycling continues to carry a range of occupational health and environmental risks

(1) 54/07/10 4:15pm, Sam Sheppard

Questioning and statement by Sam Sheppard to the Cuyahoga County Sheriff\u27s office

(1) 54/07/10 4:15pm, Sam Sheppard

Questioning and statement by Sam Sheppard to the Cuyahoga County Sheriff\u27s office

From Waste to Resources? Interrogating ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the Global Environmental Governance of the Hazardous Waste Trade

The rise of global environmental governance regimes allegedly contradicts the process of an environmental “race to the bottom” (RTB) that results from capitalist globalization. We examine new developments in this area through a qualitative case study of the Basel Convention. Here, we find that new regulations in toxic wastes governance are in fact being co-created with industry actors and aim to accelerate the flow of toxic “resources” to less-developed countries. Further, these shifts are legitimized by a shift in discourse— from thinking of toxics materials as “wastes” to thinking of them as “resources”— that re-frames the toxic wastes trade as essential for sustainable economic development rather than as a manifestation of global environmental injustice, thereby undermining environmentalist claims. Our findings suggest that, despite an expansion of hazardous waste regulations, the RTB concept is still relevant in the context of global environmental governance. We conclude that a fruitful avenue for applying the RTB concept in this context is to go beyond a strict materialist interpretation of global politics to also consider the role of discourses and contesting ideologies in shaping global environmental policy debates.</em