10 research outputs found

    Factors determining the difference of residual affinity of medical records by year

    No full text
    ๋ณด๊ฑดํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์ด ํ™˜์ž์ง„๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ์˜ํ•™์—ฐ๊ตฌ, ๋ฒ•์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ๋จ์œผ๋กœ ํ˜„๋Œ€ ๋ณ‘์›์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋ฅผ ๋Œ€๋‹จํžˆ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ทจ๊ธ‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณด๊ด€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์–‘์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ณด๊ด€์žฅ์†Œ์˜ ๋ถ€์กฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๋ณ‘์›๋“ค์€ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์„ ์žฅ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ณด๊ด€ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋งŽ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๋Š๋ผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๊ฐ€ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ํ›„ ํ•ด๋งˆ๋‹ค ๊ฐ์†Œํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์— ์—ฐ๋„๋ณ„ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„์˜ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์š”์ธ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ๋ณด์กด ๋˜๋Š” ํ๊ธฐ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋‚ญ๋น„์™€ ์†์‹ค์„ ์ค„์—ฌ๋ณด๊ณ ์ž ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 1974๋…„ ์ผ๋…„๋™์•ˆ Heogkr ๋ถ€์†๋ณ‘์›์„ ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋‚ด์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž…์›ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž ์ค‘ 3,649๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ 10๋…„๊ฐ„์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์š”์ธ๋“ค์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์•Œ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ x**2 -test ์™€ ๋‹ค๋ณ€์ˆ˜ ํšŒ๊ท€๋ถ„์„ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์กฐ์‚ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1. ์ „์ฒด ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๋ณ„ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๋Š” ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋‚ด์›ํ•œ์ง€ 1๋…„ํ›„์—๋Š” 1.0% ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฉ๊ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ๋ชจ๋“  ๊ณผ์—์„œ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ํ˜„์ƒ์€ ๊ณตํ†ต์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. 2. ์ง„๋ฃŒ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์˜๋ฌด๊ธฐ๋ก์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ทธ ์ค‘์—์„œ๋„ ํŠนํžˆ ์ •์‹ ๊ณผ์™€ ์‚ฐ๊ณผ, ์•ˆ๊ณผ, ๋‚ด๊ณผ์˜ ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. 3. ์žฌ์ž…์›์‹œ์˜ ์ง„๋‹จ๋ช…๊ณผ ์ข…์ „ ์ง„๋‹จ๋ช…๊ณผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์€ ๋Œ€๋‹จํžˆ ๋†’์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋™์ผ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์˜ ๊ณ„์†์ ์ธ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์žฌ์ž…์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. 4. ์ž…์›๊ฒฝ๋กœ ์ค‘ ์™ธ๋ž˜๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž…์›ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. 5. ์žฌ์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ๊ณ  ๊ฑฐ์ฃผ์ง€๊ฐ€ ๋ณ‘์›์—์„œ ๋ฉ€์ˆ˜๋ก ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. 6. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์ž”์กด์นœํ™”๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Medical records are being used as basic information for patient care, medical research, and the reference of medicolegal problem. They are, therefore, are recognized to be important and being stored for many years. Most of hospitals, however, have been encountering problems to store those records mainly because of lack of storage space. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to identify the factors determining the differences of residual affinity of medical records by year under the hypothesis that the residual affinity of records would decrease by progress of year. 3.649 patients firstly admitted to and discharged from H university hospital for the year, 1974 were studied. X**2 -test and stepwise multiple regression were used to test the relationships among multiple factors in relation with residual affinity of medical records. The major findings were summarized below: 1. Residual affinity of medical records by progress of year decreased below 1.0% after one year and below 0.4% after five years from first admission. Those were common temdency among all departments except the department of obstetrics. 2. Department of the hospital admitted was identified as the most important factor. Departments of Neuropsychiatry, Obstetrics, Ophthalmology, and Internal Medicine were among those significantly associated with the high residual affinity. 3. The disease entity of the first and second admissions was related to high affinity. 4. Residual affinity was strongly related with cases of longer hospital stay and farther residential location. 5. Residual affinity was significnatly related with cases being operated.restrictio

    A Trend Analysis of Individual TEPS Scores

    No full text
    A survey was conducted by Korean Gallup and Marketing Research Korea on the test takers who took the first TEPS exam administered on January 31, 1999. The results indicated a strong consensus among English teachers and test-takers as to the validity of the test method facets of the TEPS exam. There are, however, some who feel that the TEPS exam does not yield reliable results. In order to investigate the extent to which such claims hold true, the present study attempts to conduct a systematic trend analysis based on the test-takers' performances. The study identifies those test-takers who took the TEPS more than twice within a two year period (1999-2000), and explored the fluctuation pattern, if any, of the test-takers' performances while taking into account their ability level, gender, and age
    corecore