宋時烈의 道統論과 文廟釐正 논의

King Hyojong"s reign, Song Shi-Yeol engaged in further studies and teachings of Chu Hsi. Song supposed himself and his fellow Seoin/西人 Sanrim/山林 members to the successor of Chu Hsi, and reviewed the studies of former masters of him such as Lee Ih/李珥, Kim Jang Saeng/金長生 and Jo Heon/趙憲, with the Cuase of Justice theory(義理論). Song"s Cause of Justice theory triggered the effort of reviewing the past Confucian figures during the reign of King Hyeonjong. He suggested a new way of evaluating someone or something based upon the character(人品) and the level of engagement in Confucian ideologies. In the process, a new genealogy of historical figures was established with Gija/箕子, Jeong Mong-Ju/鄭夢周, Jo Gwang-Jo/趙光祖, and Lee Ih/李珥 in line. During the reign of King Hyeonjong, Song tried to consolidate the legitimacy factor of the Neo-Cofucianism by bringing modifications to the National Confucian Shrine policies and practices(文廟祀典), and to establish the status of Lee Ih and Kim Jang Saeng as the true successors of Chu Hsi"s studies and philosophy

朴世采의 朱子學 연구와 『朱子大全拾遺』

Since Zhu-Xi(朱熹)"s writings was introduced during the late Koryo(高麗) dynasty, the studies about Zhu-Xi"s writings done by Chosǔn(朝鮮) scholars up until the early 17th century basically showed the form of anthology, a selection of the writings of Zhu-Xi from the text ZhuZiDaQuan(朱子大全). Compared with these studies, ZhuZiDaQuanSubyu(朱子大全拾遺) compiled by Park Se-Chae was a compilation of Zhu-Xis writings selected from various other classical books beyond the boundary of ZhuZiDaQuan. This text shows the widening of the range of studies of Zhu-Xis Neo-Confucianism by Chosǔn scholars. Meanwhile, Park Se-Chae and Song Shi-Yeol(宋時烈) showed severe differences in views regarding the form and substance of ZhuZiDaQuanSubyu. It is suggested that in the long run, such conflict that had arisen from research of Zhu-Xis writings affected the stream of political situations which included Noron(老論)ㆍSoron(少論) divergence during the late 17th century

Song Shi Yeol`s theories and thoughts upon the politics fulfilling the `requirements of the era`

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :국사학과,2005.Docto

潛谷 金堉(1580~1658)의 學風과 時勢 認識

During the early 17th century, the Chosen society was facing the aftermath of two devastating wars that had broken out respectively in the Imjin year and the Byeongja year. The society was struggling to overcome it. yet restoring the very foundation of the country, and also healing the psychological impact, that a shameful defeat to barbarious invaders have brought to the Choseon people, was not an easy task. The Scholar-officials were to oversee and supervise the process. Jamgok Kim Yuk (1580-1658) was one of such scholar-official. He was determined to stabilize the general public's ordinary lives, and worked for that goal throughout his entire life. The academic heritage that continued throughout his family line, from Kim Shik(金湜/his Great-great grandfather) through Kim Deok Su(金德秀/Great grandfather). Kim Bi(金棐/Grandfather). Kim Gweon(金權/Granduncle) and his own father Kim Heung Wu(金興宇), was what defined Kim Yuk's academic traits and color in their early stages of development. Also, the surrounding environment provided him with glimpses of the Geungi/近畿 area Dohak/道學 studies, which were the central studies of the Gimyo Sarim/己卯士林 members and other scholars such as Seong Hon/成渾 and Baek In Geol/白仁傑 Other figures who had an important influence upon Kim Yuk's studies included Cho Ho Ik/曺好益 and Yun Geun Su/尹根壽 Through them. Kim Yuk was introduced to new philosophical trends, such as Sang-Su-hak(象數學) or theories regarding Traditional literature of the Chinese Chin-Han era(秦漢古文論) that have started to receive substantial attention in the capital area since the late 16th century. Influenced by all these factors. Kim Yuk developed a very practical sense and point of view in devising his own academic theories intended to remedy certain social problems and eventually better the society(經世論). His academic traits were criticized by scholars of the San-dang/山黨 party members like Kim Jib/金集 or Song Shi Yeol/宋時烈. for being overly utilitarian(功利) or even for undermining the principals that should be abided by at any cost (in other words, for bordering upon an act of 'Paedo/(覇道) In response. Kim Yuk blamed such members for merely adhering to shallow literature(浮文) without any real substance. He strongly criticized their ways of understanding traditional Chinese philosophy texts such as 『Daehak/大學』 and 『Jungyong/中庸』 and he also criticized their attitude of doggedly emphasizing concepts like Sincere thoughts (試意). Correcting one's own mentality(正心). and the Universality of the orders of Heaven(天理) in a 'dogmatic' fashion. As an alternative, he suggested the underrated importance of 「Noneo/論語」 and 『Hyogyeong/孝經』 that had been deemed very important as a basis for the theory of traditional monarchism during the Chinese Han(漢) era

英祖 前半期(1724~1744)의 書籍政策

18세기 조선 사회는 英祖와 正祖가 추진한 蕩平政治를 기반으로 17세 기 후반 이래 朋黨 政治가 노정해온 문제점들을 극복해가며 찬란한 문화적 업적을 성취한 시기였다. 특히 국가 의 주도 아래 활발하게 전개된 각종 서적의 편찬과 간행사업은 이 시기 문화발전을 대표하 는 가장 특징적인 면모 가운데 하나이다. 개국 이래 일관되게 文治主義를 표방해온 조선왕조에서 서적은 敎化의 근본이자 治亂의 원천으로 인식되어 왔다. 조선의 역대 국왕들은 통치이념의 정비와 백성들에 대 한 敎化의 주요 수단으로 서적정책을 중시하였으며，따라서 校書館등 국가 기관의 주관 아래 편찬 • 간행된 서적들은 당시의 정치적 상황뿐만 아니라 사상 • 문화의 변천과도 밀접한 상관관계를 가진 것이었다. 특히 兩亂의 후유증을 극복하고 어느 정도 사회가 안정되어가던 18세기 英. .正祖代에 들어와서는 국왕의 적극적인 주도 아래 그 어느 때보다 활발한 서적정책이 추 진되었다. 이러한 현상은 붕당정치의 파탄에서 비롯된 갈등과 모순을 극복하기 위한 제도적 토대를 마련함과 동시에， 17세 기 이후 이룩한 사상 • 문화의 발전 성과를 정리함으로써 새 로운 사회를 준비하려는 노력 이 결실을 맺은 것이라 해석할 수 있다

Fault Detection & SPC of Batch Process using Multi-way Regression Method

학위논문(석사) --서울대학교 대학원 :화학생물공학부,2007.Maste

英ㆍ正祖代 弘文館 기능의 변화

학위논문(석사)--서울대학교 대학원 :국사학과,1998.Maste