46 research outputs found
Gender, Big Five and Intrinsic Motivation as Predictors of Job Creativity among Public Officers
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์๋ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋๋ผ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ ๋ฐ ์ฑ๊ฒฉ 5์์ธ๊ณผ ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์ฑ๋ณ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋์ง, ์ด๋ค์ ์ฑ๊ฒฉ 5์์ธ๊ณผ ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ์ ์ด๋ ํ ์ํฅ์ ์ฃผ๋์ง ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์ฑ๊ฒฉ 5์์ธ๊ณผ ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ๊ฐ์ ๊ด๊ณ๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐํ๋์ง๋ฅผ ์ดํด๋ณด๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ์ต์ข
๋ถ์ ๋์์ ์ ๋ถ์ค์์ฒญ์ฌ์ ์ฌ์ง ์ค์ธ ์ค์ธ 308๋ช
์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์๋ค์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ค์ ํ๊ท ์ฐ๋ น์ ๋ง 39.38์ธ์๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋จ์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ด ์ฌ์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ ๋นํด ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ, ์ฑ์ค์ฑ, ๊ฐ๋ฐฉ์ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๋์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฌ์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ ๋จ์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ ๋นํด ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฆ์ฑ์ด ๋์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ํ ๋จ์ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ผ์๋ก ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ์ด ๋ฐ์ด๋๋ฉฐ, ์ฑ๋ณ์ ๊ด๊ณ์์ด ์ฑ์คํ๊ณ , ์ธํฅ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์๋ก์ด ๊ฒฝํ์ ๋ํด ๊ฐ๋ฐฉ์ ์ด๊ณ , ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฆ์ ์ฑํฅ์ด ๋ ํ ์๋ก ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ์ด ๋ฐ์ด๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ง์ง๋ง์ผ๋ก, ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ๋ ์ฑ๊ฒฉ 5์์ธ ์ค ๊ฐ๋ฐฉ์ฑ, ์ฑ์ค์ฑ, ์ธํฅ์ฑ ์์ธ๊ณผ ์ง๋ฌด ์ฐฝ์์ฑ๊ฐ์ ๊ด๊ณ๋ฅผ ๋งค๊ฐํด ์ฃผ๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ ๊ณต๋ฌด์์ ์ธ์ฌ ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ด๋นํ๋ ํ์ ๊ฐ๋ค์๊ฒ ๊ตญ๊ฐ์ ๋ฏธ๋๋ฅผ ์ด๋์ด ๊ฐ ์ฐฝ์์ธ์ฌ ์ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ ์ก์ฑ์ ์ํ ๊ธฐ์ด ์๋ฃ๋ก ํ์ฉ๋ ์ ์์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๊ธฐ๋๋๋ค.This study was to examine the role of gender, the Big Five personality traits and intrinsic motivation as predictors of job creativity among public officers.
Of the 450 public officers in Central Government Complex in Seoul, Korea, 308 completed and returned the questionnaire yielding a total response rate of 68.4%. The final sample consisted of 168 males, 135 females and 5 missing values. Their average age was 39.38 years. It was observed that male officers had higher job creativity, conscientiousness, openness to experience and intrinsic motivation than female officers, whereas female officers had higher neuroticism than male officers. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses showed that gender(male), conscientiousness, openness to experience, extroversion, neuroticism and intrinsic motivation predicted job creativity of public officers. Moreover, mediational analysis indicated that intrinsic motivation mediated the relationship between three of the Big Five personalty traits(i.e., conscientiousness, openness to experience and extroversion) and job creativity
Personal Characteristics Influencing Self-leadership among Adults
๋ณธ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์์๋ ์์ธ, ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋ถ์ฐ ์ง์ญ์์ ํ์งํ ์ด 495๋ช
์ ์ฑ์ธ๋ค์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ์ ์์ค(์ยทํ)์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ ์ง๋จ ๊ฐ์ ์ด๋ ํ ๊ฐ์ธ์ ํน์ฑ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ ๋ํ๋๋์ง, ๋ ์ง๋จ ๊ฐ ์ ์ํ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ํ๋ด๋ ๊ฐ์ธ์ ํน์ฑ ๋ณ์ธ ์ค ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ์์ค์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ ์ง๋จ์ ์์ธก ํด์ฃผ๋ ๋ณ์ธ์ด ๋ฌด์์ธ์ง ํ์ํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ์์ค์ด ๋์ ์ฑ์ธ๋ค(์ ์ง๋จ)์ ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ์์ค์ด ๋ฎ์ ์ฑ์ธ๋ค(ํ ์ง๋จ)๋ณด๋ค ์ฐฝ์์ ์ธ ์ธ์ฑ์ ์ง๋๊ณ ์์ผ๋ฉฐ, ์์จ์ฑยท์ ๋ฅ๊ฐยท๊ด๊ณ์ฑ์ ์ฌ๋ฆฌ์ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ์๊ตฌ๊ฐ ์ ์ถฉ์กฑ๋์ด ์๊ณ , ๋ด์ ํต์ ์์ฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์์ผ๋ฉฐ ๋ด์ฌ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋๊ธฐํ ๋์ด ์๊ณ ์ธํฅ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ฑ์คํ๊ณ ์นํ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ฒฝํ์ ๋ํด ๊ฐ๋ฐฉ์ ์ธ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ํ ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ์์ค์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ ์ง๋จ ๊ฐ ์ ์ํ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ ํ์ ์์ธ๋ค์ด ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ์ ์ผ๋ง๋ ์์ธกํด์ฃผ๋์ง๋ฅผ ์ดํด๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ด๊ณ์ฑ, ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ, ์ฑ์ค์ฑ์ด ๋ ์ง๋จ์ 87.0% ์ ํํ๊ฒ ์์ธกํด ์ฃผ๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ํ๋ฌ๋ค. ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ํฅํ ์ฑ์ธ๋ค์ ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ์ฆ์ง์ ์ํด ๊ด๊ณ์ฑ, ๋ด์ฌ์ ๋๊ธฐ, ์ฑ์ค์ฑ์ ํจ์ํ ์ ์๋ ์์๋ค์ ํฌ์
ํ ์
ํ๋ฆฌ๋์ญ ํ๋ก๊ทธ๋จ์ด ๊ฐ๋ฐ๋ ํ์๊ฐ ์๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ํ๋จ๋๋ค.This study was to explore whether adults with higher self-leadership have higher personal characteristics such as creative characters, psychological basic needs (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness), intrinsic motivation, internal locus of control, and the Big 5 personality traits than those with lower self-leadership (SL). In this study, 495 adults were classified into two groups based on scores of the Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire (RSLQ): high SL group and low SL group. Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was performed to investigate group differences on their personal characteristics. The findings showed that high SL group had higher personal characters, psychological basic needs, intrinsic motivation, internal locus of control, and four factors of the Big 5 personality traits (i.e., openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreeableness). A binary logistic regression analysis showed that 87.0 percent of the adults in this study were accurately classified as either high SL group or low SL group in respect to the relatedness, intrinsic motivation, and conscientiousness. Implications of the findings were discussed
Comprehensive Diagnosis and Analysis for the Effectiveness of Science-Gifted Education Program in Korea
๋
ผ๋ฌธ ์์ฝ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ๊ฐ? ๋ํ๋ถ์ค ๊ณผํ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์์ด ๋ณธ๊ฒฉ์ ์ผ๋ก ์ด์๋ ์ง ์ด๋๋ง 10๋
์ด ๋ค๊ฐ์ค๋ ํ์์ ์์ ๊ณผ์ฐ ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ํจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋ผ๊ณ ํ๊ฐํ ์ ์๋๊ฐ? ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์์์ ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฐ๋ ๋์ ํ์๋ค์ ์ธ์ง์ , ๋น์ธ์ง์ ์ธก๋ฉด์์ ์ด๋ป๊ฒ ๋ฌ๋ผ์ง๋ฉฐ ์๋ฃ ํ์ ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ๋ฐ์ง ์์ ํ์๋ค๊ณผ ์ด๋ ํ ์ธก๋ฉด์์ ์ฐจ๋ณํ๋๋๊ฐ? ์ด๋ฌํ ๋ฌผ์์ ๋ตํ๋ ๊ฒ์ด ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ ๋ชฉํ์ด๋ค. ๋ํ๋ถ์ค ๊ณผํ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์์ ํจ๊ณผ์ฑ์ ์ด์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก ์ง๋จํ๊ณ ๋ถ์ํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ์ด ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ 1) ์ ๊ตญ 22๊ฐ ๋ํ๋ถ์ค ๊ณผํ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ์ฌํ์, ์๋ฃ์, ์ฐธ์ฌ ๊ต์๋ค์ ๋์์ผ๋ก ๋๊ท๋ชจ์ ์ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์ฌ, 2) ์์ฌ๊ต์ก ์ํ์ง๋จ๊ณผ ๋น๊ต์ง๋จ ๊ฐ์ ๋จ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ์ค์ฅ๊ธฐ์ ๋น๊ต๋ถ์, 3) ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์ ์๋ฃ์๋ค์ ๋ํ ์ถ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํตํ ์ง๋กํํฉ ํ์
๋ฑ์ ์ค์ํ์๋ค. ๋ณธ ๊ณ ์์๋ ๊ฐ๊ฐ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์์ธํ ์ ์ํ๊ธฐ ๋ณด๋ค๋ ํ๊ตญ ์ฌํ์์ ํ์ฌ ํ๋ฐํ๊ฒ ์ด๋ฃจ์ด์ง๊ณ ์๋ ์์ฌ๊ต์ก ํจ๊ณผ์ฑ์ ๊ดํ ์ ์ฒด์ ์ธ ์ค๊ณฝ์ ์ ์ํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ๊ฐ๊ฐ์ ์ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ค์ ์์ฝํ์ฌ ๊ธฐ์ ํจ์ผ๋ก์จ ๋ํ๋ถ์ค ๊ณผํ์์ฌ๊ต์ก์์ ํจ๊ณผ์ฑ์ ๋ํด ๋ณด๋ค ์ข
ํฉ์ ์ด๊ณ ๋ค์ํ ์๊ฐ์ ์ ๊ณตํ๊ณ ์ ํ์๋ค.
Is gifted education effective? It is both an important and sensitive question. It is almost ten years that gifted education centers affiliated with universities have been managed to educate gifted learners in Korea. However, there has been so little effort to evaluate the effectiveness of those gifted education programs and so little evidence that gifted education is effective or not. How and in what aspects gifted learners are differentiated or improved through the gifted education programs? The present study is initiated from these questions. To diagnose and analyse comprehensively the effectiveness of gifted education program at the gifted education centers affiliated with universities, the study carried out following four subordinate studies: 1) a survey of students, professors, and graduates of 22 gifted education centers nationwide; 2) a quasi experimental study to compare the gifted education center students and the potentially gifted students without any gifted education services both in short and long term base; 3) an analysis of career of the graduates of gifted education center through the follow up study. To show the comprehensive perspective on the effectiveness of the gifted education programs, the present study is composed of the short main results of the each study on the above rather than to describe the overall results of each study in detail and in separate