6 research outputs found

    Influence of different types of resin cement on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with MOD ceramic inlays

    Get PDF
    ์น˜๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™/์„์‚ฌThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of 3 different types of resin cements on the failure of teeth restored with ceramic inlays using a universal testing machine. Seventy-five intact, caries-free human maxillary premolars were divided into 5 groups cavity preparation and restoration with IPS e.max CAD by Variolink N; Group 3, MOD cavity preparation and restoration with IPS e.max CAD by RelyX Unicem; Group 4, MOD cavity preparation and restoration with IPS e.max CAD by Multilink sprint; and Group 5, MOD cavity preparation and no restoration. Compressive force was loaded only on the cuspal inclination of tooth. Class II MOD preparation was as follows. The pulpal floor was formed at a depth of 2 mm from the occlusal cavosurface margin of the preparation, and the isthmus was half of vi the intercuspal distance. The proximal box width was 1.5 mm, and the axial wall was 2 mm in height. Margins were prepared with 90-degree cavosurface angles. Specimens were tested with a universal testing machine at 1.0 mm/min using steel sphere plungers (6.0mm in diameter). Peak load to fracture (N) was measured for each specimen. Means were calculated and analyzed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukeyโ€™s test (ฮฑ=0.05). The mean peak fracture loads (N, mean ยฑ S.D.) were as follows: Group 1 - 1371.29 ยฑ 455.86, Group 2 - 1188.18 ยฑ 408.79, Group 3 - 1097.38 ยฑ 443.64, Group 4 - 1134.69 ยฑ 352.13, Group 5 - 624.08 ยฑ 259.03. Based on the results obtained under in vitro experimental conditions, the following conclusions were drawn. There was no statistical difference of fracture load between intact teeth and restored teeth. Although Group 2 (Variolink N) showed superior fracture load than Group 3 (RelyX Unicem) and Group 4 (Multilink speed), no statistical difference was found. Groups 3 and 4, using self adhesive resin cements, showed unfavorable fracture patterns more frequently than Groups 1 and 2. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays was comparable with that of intact teeth, regardless of the type of resin cements used in this experiment.ope

    ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ๋ณตํ•ฉํšจ์†Œ์ œ์˜ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ด์œ  ์ž๋ˆ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ฑ์ , ์˜์–‘์†Œ ์†Œํ™”์œจ, ํ˜ˆ์•ก์„ฑ์ƒ, ๋ถ„๋ณ€ ๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์ƒ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ ํœ˜๋ฐœ์„ฑ ์ง€๋ฐฉ์‚ฐ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๋†์ƒ๋ช…๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2013. 8. ๊น€์œ ์šฉ.์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ์‹œ์žฅ์˜ ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋Š” ์„ธ๊ณ„ 14์œ„ ๊ถŒ, ์œ ๋Ÿฝ์—ฐํ•ฉ์„ 1๊ฐœ์˜ ๋‹จ์œ„๋กœ ๋ณด๋ฉด 10์œ„๊ถŒ ์•ˆ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•  ์ •๋„๋กœ ํฐ ์‹œ์žฅ๊ทœ๋ชจ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ 90% ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์›๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ž…์— ์˜์กดํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ตœ๊ทผ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์œ„๊ธฐ, ์œ ๊ฐ€์ƒ์Šน ๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์—ฐ๋ฃŒ (biofuel)์˜ ์ƒ์‚ฐ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ค‘๊ตญ์˜ ๊ณก๋ฌผ์†Œ๋น„๋Ÿ‰์ด ํญ๋ฐœ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์›๋ฃŒ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ์ƒ์Šนํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ ๋†๊ฐ€์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ๋น„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ€๋‹ด๊ฐ์ด ์ ์  ๊ฐ€์ค‘๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์›๋ฃŒ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ƒ์Šน์€ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ์†Œํ™”์œจ์„ ๋†’์—ฌ ์ „์ฒด์ ์ธ ํšจ์œจ์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๊ณ„๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํšจ์†Œ์ œ (๋‹จ์ผ ๋ฐ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ํšจ์†Œ์ œ)๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ž๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ•์‚ฐ ์‹œ์žฅ์— ์…€ ์ˆ˜ ์—†์ด ๋งŽ์€ ํšจ์†Œ์ œ ์ œํ’ˆ์ด ํŒ๋งค๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์ง€๋งŒ ์ฒด๊ณ„ํ™”๋œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์—†์–ด ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ธฐ์—๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์‹คํ—˜์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ์†Œํ™”ํšจ์†Œ (peptidase, amylase) ๋ฐ NSP ๋ถ„ํ•ด ํšจ์†Œ (xylanase, cellulase and ฮฑ-galactosidase)๊ฐ€ ๋ณตํ•ฉ๋œ ํšจ์†Œ์ œ์˜ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ด์œ ์ž๋ˆ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ฑ์  ๋ฐ ์˜์–‘์†Œ ์†Œํ™”์œจ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ๊ณผ ์˜์–‘์†Œ ์†Œํ™”์œจ๊ณผ in-vitro ์†Œํ™”์œจ๊ณผ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜: ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ๋ณตํ•ฉํšจ์†Œ์ œ์˜ ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ์ด์œ  ์ž๋ˆ์˜ ์„ฑ์žฅ์„ฑ์ , ์˜์–‘์†Œ ์†Œํ™”์œจ, ํ˜ˆ์•ก์„ฑ์ƒ, ๋ถ„๋ณ€ ๋‚ด ๋ฏธ์ƒ๋ฌผ ๋ฐ ํœ˜๋ฐœ์„ฑ ์ง€๋ฐฉ์‚ฐ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ ํ‰๊ท ์ฒด์ค‘ 8.51 ยฑ 1.47 kg์ธ 168๋‘์˜ ์ด์œ ์ž๋ˆ([Yorkshire ร— Landrace] ร— Duroc)์„ ์ฒด์ค‘ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋ณ„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ 4์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ 6๋ฐ˜๋ณต, ๋ˆ๋ฐฉ๋‹น 7๋‘ (3๋ฐ˜๋ณต ์•”์ปท 4๋‘, ์ž”์—ฌ 3๋ฐ˜๋ณต ์•”์ปท ๋‘)์˜ ์™„์ „์ž„์˜๋ฐฐ์น˜๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ด 5์ฃผ๊ฐ„์˜ ์‚ฌ์–‘์‹คํ—˜์— ๋ฐฐ์น˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๋ณ„๋กœ ์ด 2๋‹จ๊ณ„์˜ ์‹คํ—˜์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 %์˜ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ํšจ์†Œ์ œ๊ฐ€ ์˜ฅ์ˆ˜์ˆ˜-๋Œ€๋‘๋ฐ•-๋ณด๋ฆฌ ์œ„์ฃผ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ์ฒจ๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„ ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋“  ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ตฌ์˜ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ ๋‚ด ์˜์–‘์†Œ ํ•จ๋Ÿ‰์€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๋™์ผํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์–‘์‹คํ—˜ ์ „๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์‚ฌ๋ฃŒ์™€ ๋ฌผ์€ ์ž์œ ์ฑ„์‹ํ† ๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค (ad libitum). ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์–‘๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ์ „ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๋ณตํ•ฉ ํšจ์†Œ์ œ๋ฅผ 0.1 ~ 0.3 % ์ฒจ๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ์ฒด์ค‘ ๋ฐ ์ผ๋‹น์ฆ์ฒด๋Ÿ‰์ด ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฌ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ ์˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐœ์„ ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค (quadratic, P0.05), whereas quadratic responses (P<0.05) were detected in nitrogen (N) urine and N digestibility. There were no significant differences in the blood profiles of blood urea nitrogen and total protein level. However, glucose level was increased as dietary NSP enzyme complex increased at 2 week (quadratic, P<0.05). Base on fecal microflora results, the number of fecal pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) did not differ among all treatment, whereas fecal Lactobacillus counts were increased with dietary NSP enzyme complex level increased at 5 week. The inclusion level of dietary NSP enzyme complex in weaning pigs diet linearly down regulated in total volatile fatty acid, acetate and propionate in feces (linear, P<0.01). Results from this experiment suggested that dietary NSP enzyme complex ranged 0.1 to 0.2 % with dietary fiber ingredient might have beneficial effects on weaning pigs by a increase of growth performance and an increment of fecal Lactobacillus count.Summary i Contents iii List of Tables v List of Figures vii List of Abbreviations viii โ… . Introduction 1 โ…ก. Review of Literature 3 1. Global and Korean livestock industry 3 2. Enzyme and livestock industry 7 2.1. General information of enzyme 7 2.2. Classification of Enzyme 8 2.3. Need of enzyme in animal nutrition 9 3. Non Starch Polysaccharide and NSP enzyme 10 3.1. Definition and classification of NSP 10 3.2. NSP in feed raw material 13 3.3. Anti-nutritive effect of NSP 14 3.4. Improving the nutritive value of feedstuffs 19 3.5. Mode of action of NSP enzyme 21 4. Feed enzyme in swine 22 4.1. NSP enzyme 22 4.2. Protease and amylase 23 โ…ข. Effect of Dietary Enzyme Complex Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Profiles, Fecal Microflora and Volatile Fatty Acid in Weaning Pigs 26 Abstract 26 Introduction 28 Materials and methods 29 Results and discussion 33 Conclusion 39 โ…ฃ. Literature Cited 50 โ…ค. Summary in Korean 60 โ…ฅ. Acknowledgement 62Maste
    corecore