Monitoreig i presa de decisions al rio viejo

Postprint (published version

Monitoring human right to water in rural areas: a Nicaraguan case study

Much effort has gone into the recognition of the hu man right to water. Without doubt, this milestone influences governance and decision making processes at different scales. Now it is essential to shift discussion from legal and conceptual framework to p ractice. Taking this idea into account, the article proposes a methodology for monitoring the implement ation of the right. The work takes the legal and conceptual framework of the right, agreed by intern ational consensus, as a starting point. Moreover, l essons learnt from other indicators and indexes constructi on are considered. It is based on a water & sanitat ion rural services case study carried out in Nicaragua and pa rticularly in Jinotega and Matagalpa -rural departm ents from the north-central region-. The different categ ories of the right to water were included in survey s and structured interviews design that were conducted in rural households and water comities, respectively. Ingeniería sin Fronteras-ApD, an Spanish NGDO, prom oted the study in cooperation with local organizati ons -La Cuculmeca and Coalición de Organizaciones por e l Derecho al Agua (CODA)-. Results show how the inclusion of right to water dimensions gives pertin ent insights both as regards knowledge about the re al situation of rural communities as for improving gov ernance in rural water supply.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

A holistic and participatory information system for rural water and sanitation sector in Latin America and the Caribbean

The provision of water supply, sanitation and hygiene services has emerged as a top priority in the development agenda in Latin American and the Caribbean. In light of the investments envisaged to reach the targets set by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), information systems (IS) will play a key role in improving decision-making. In this context, this article introduces a global IS which is increasingly implemented in a number of countries across Latin America and the Caribbean as a policy instrument to support national and local decision-making: the Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Information System (SIASAR). This information system includes a comprehensive framework for data collection, data analysis and data dissemination that simultaneously fulfils different stakeholders’ needs. This article analyses these three key monitoring issues from the viewpoint of stakeholders’ involvement. Results indicate that SIASAR represents a suitable monitoring framework to analyse sustainable services and the level of service delivered. Additionally, it is highlighted the advantages of adopting a continued participatory approach in system development, namely i) the stimulation of experience exchange and knowledge sharing among recipient counties, ii) the promotion of learnt-by-doing, and iii) an increase of regional understanding, collaboration and comparison.Postprint (published version

Post-2015 WASH targets and indicators: a review from a Human Rights Perspective

Informe tècnicPreprin

Monitoring sanitation and hygiene in the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: A review through the lens of human rights

International monitoring of drinking water and sanitation has been jointly carried out by WHO and UNICEF through their Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP). With the end of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) era in 2015, the JMP has proposed a post-2015 framework for integrated monitoring of water and sanitation targets included in the Sustainable Development Goal no. 6. This article discusses how each element of the proposed sanitation target and corresponding indicators can be understood from a human rights perspective. Building on the MDGs, and although some of the weaknesses and gaps persist, the discussion suggests that the post-2015 proposal is a step forward towards a monitoring framework where human rights elements related to sanitation are effectively promoted. In addition, to support the interpretation and implementation of the normative content of human rights obligations related to sanitation, the study proposes a reduced set of easy-to-assess indicators to measure the normative criteria of this right, which are then grouped in a multidimensional framework to describe increasing levels of sanitation service. To do this, the study combines literature review and specific local experience from three case studies. It is shown that the proposed monitoring tools, namely the indicators and the multidimensional indicator framework, provide guidance on monitoring the human right to sanitation. In doing so, they might ultimately help sector stakeholders in the realization of this right.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Development of methods for monitoring the water and sanitation sector at different scales through human rights lenses

El reconocimiento del Derecho Humano al Agua y Saneamiento (DHAS) a través de las resoluciones de la Asamblea General y del Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas en 2010 representa un gran avance en el sector del Agua, Saneamiento e Higiene ya que otorga a todos los seres humanos el derecho a la provisión de unos estándares mínimos en relación a estos servicios. Tres hechos sientan las bases que motivan la investigación: i) las instituciones internacionales tienen la potestad de supervisar el cumplimiento del Derecho Humano por parte de los Estados pero las herramientas necesarias para esta tarea aún han sido definidas, ii) este hito influye en la gobernanza y la toma de decisiones a diferentes escalas y iii) la medición del acceso al agua en la nueva era de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible exige tomar en cuenta el marco de los derechos humanos. Esto supone por un lado que su contenido debe ser considerado a la hora de conceptualizar el nivel de servicio a través de indicadores adecuados y por el otro, exige dar seguimiento a la reducción de las desigualdades. Este trabajo contribuye de manera significativa a cada uno de los tres retos presentados. En primer lugar, se identifican las plataformas JMP WHO/UNICEF y GLAAS como mecanismos de especial interés para aquellos que tienen el mandato de vigilar el cumplimiento del derecho, lo cual contribuye de alguna forma al desafío planteado. En este sentido, la información que ofrecen ha sido analizada tomando en consideración el marco de los derechos humanos. Se ha construido una matriz para identificar específicamente de qué manera estos datos se podrían combinar para la vigilancia del DHAS en un sentido amplio. La nueva propuesta de JMP contribuye considerablemente con indicadores de resultados para medir el disfrute de los titulares de derechos y GLAAS añade indicadores estructurales y de proceso para medir la conducta de los titulares de deberes. Sin embargo, todavía quedarían vacíos de información y en este sentido la tesis contribuye con algunas ideas acerca de la forma en que se podrían abordar estas deficiencias. En segundo lugar, se propone una metodología para la medición y el seguimiento del acceso al agua en zonas rurales haciendo uso del marco conceptual del derecho humano al agua. Los diferentes criterios del derecho han sido incluidos en encuestas y entrevistas estructuradas que han sido implementadas en hogares y comités de agua rurales, respectivamente. Se analizan y discuten las ventajas y los retos relacionados con la utilización de este marco. Además, el enfoque proporciona elementos con potencial para la definición de políticas que han sido discutidos. Por último, esta investigación desarrolla y testea una metodología para medir disparidades a nivel intra-comunitario basadas en los criterios normativos del derecho humano al agua. Para ello se lleva a cabo un muestreo estratificado donde se definen dos tipologías de casas; aquellas que consumen agua gestionada por los comités de ahia potable y las que se abastece de agua por sus propios medios. Este enfoque implica tomar en consideración poblaciones muy reducidas y por lo tanto se debe prestar especial atención a los tamaños de muestra y las incertidumbres asociadas a las estimaciones. La metodología propuesta es práctica a la hora de localizar y caracterizar con precisión la situación de sectores minoritarios en el seno de las comunidades rurales y permite ir más allá de lo que ofrecen los estimadores de tendencia central. Esto implica mayores costes para la recolección de datos en terreno que los enfoques tradicionales. Éstos son asumibles dada la relevancia de la propuesta desde una perspectiva de derechos humanos, la cual exige desarrollar instrumentos adecuados para la definición de políticas con enfoque de equidad en el ámbito local. Además la investigación destaca cómo podrían utilizarse los resultados para los procesos de toma de decisionesThe recognition of the Human right to Water and Sanitation (HRWS) through UN General Assembly and Human rights Council Resolutions in 2010 represents great progress in the Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) sector as it entitles everyone to the provision of minimum standards of these essential services. Much effort has gone into the recognition of these emerging human rights so it is essential now to shift discussion from legal and conceptual framework to practice. In this sense, three facts give the motivation to this thesis: First, international institutions have the authority to monitor States compliance with the Human right to Water and Sanitation (HRWS) but the necessary tools for this task are not ready yet. Secondly, this milestone influences governance and decision making processes at different scales. And finally, measuring access to water in the Sustainable Development Goals era involves taking into account the human rights framework. Therefore, its content should be considered to conceptualize the level of service through adequate indicators and to follow-up inequities reduction at global, national and local level. Accordingly, this work contributes significantly to each of one the three challenges presented. First, human development sector has a wider experience on using information about progress which provides a perfect opportunity to develop this further. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) and UN Water GLAAS datasets could be used for those with a mandate to monitoring the right, contributing to this challenge. Consequently, the information they offer has been analysed through a human rights lens. A matrix has been constructed to specifically identify in which extend their datasets could be combined to monitoring HRWS in a broad sense. JMP-led post-2015 proposal considerably contributes with outcome indicators to measure right holders' enjoyment of the right and GLAAS adds structural and process ones to measure duty bearers' conduct. However, there are still some critical gaps if both UN Water platforms will be used to report progress on HRWS. The thesis forwards some ideas concerning the way these shortcomings could be addressed.Second, this work proposes a methodology for monitoring access to water in rural areas using the framework of this human right. The practicality of the approach is demonstrated by a case study carried out in Nicaragua. Different criteria of the right to water were included in surveys and structured interviews that were conducted in rural households and water committees, respectively. Discussion analyses advantages and challenges of using this framework. Finally, the approach provides elements for policy making that can be used by different stakeholders from development and human rights sectors. Finally, this research develops and tests a methodology to measure intra-community disparities based on human right to water normative criteria through a stratified sampling, splitting households served by community based organizations and those self-provided. This approach implies considering much reduced populations, thus special care needs to be taken with sample sizes and uncertainty of estimators. The proposed methodology is practical to locate and accurately characterize minority sectors within rural communities and allows moving beyond central-tendency estimators. It implies higher costs for field data collection than traditional approaches, but this can be assumed given the relevance of the approach from a human rights perspective, which calls for adequate tools for equity-oriented policy making at local level. The research point out how results might be used to shape decision-making processe

Revisión del sistema de seguimiento del programa TERRENA en la subcuenca alta del río Viejo (Nicaragua)

Este estudio muestra la experiencia de un grupo de investigación universitario a la hora de identifica r problemas, aportar recomendaciones e implementar ca mbios en el monitoreo de intervenciones de Cooperación de cierta envergadura: cuatro años de e jecución, recursos económicos elevados, un equipo de más de sesenta personas, abundantes consultorías y gran cantidad y diversidad de beneficiarios. Se utiliza como estudio de caso la intervención de una ONGD española en Nicaragua. El grupo ha revisado documentación y llevado a cabo dos misiones técnica s en terreno, cada una de seis semanas de duración. En la primera se recogió información para el diagnóstico y para la elaboración de la propues ta del nuevo sistema de seguimiento. En la segunda se presenta el nuevo esquema al equipo y se empieza a trabajar de forma conjunta en la identificación d e necesidades de información y en la planificación de su seguimiento. Posteriormente se trabajará en la impl ementación de un sistema para la gestión de la información. Los resultados pertinentes y exitosos muestran el potencial del trabajo conjunto entre ONGDs y Universidad.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version

Decision Support model for SIASAR. Technical proposal (v. 2015.07).

Research group on Engineering Sciences and Global Development, UPC, Barcelona, España.Preprin

Metas e indicadores post 2015 en agua y saneamiento: una revisión desde un enfoque de derechos humanos

Preprin

Metas e indicadores post 2015 en agua y saneamiento: una revisión desde un enfoque de derechos humanos

Informe tècnicPreprin