36 research outputs found

    Technology in health and social care: a critical reflection from across two continents

    Get PDF
    An ageing population, with pressure on health care and social care capacity, is driving demand for innovative solutions to support independence at home. Digital technologies have been proposed as a way to respond to these challenges, and as a consequence, the delivery of care is being transformed. However, in spite of technology being positioned as a panacea to meet the current challenges facing health and social care, a lack of critical discourse around technology use in this context is of concern. Issues regarding user acceptance, role of care technology and setting realistic expectations on what technology can contribute to these challenges have yet to be addressed

    An intelligent information forwarder for healthcare big data systems with distributed wearable sensors

    Get PDF
    © 2016 IEEE. An increasing number of the elderly population wish to live an independent lifestyle, rather than rely on intrusive care programmes. A big data solution is presented using wearable sensors capable of carrying out continuous monitoring of the elderly, alerting the relevant caregivers when necessary and forwarding pertinent information to a big data system for analysis. A challenge for such a solution is the development of context-awareness through the multidimensional, dynamic and nonlinear sensor readings that have a weak correlation with observable human behaviours and health conditions. To address this challenge, a wearable sensor system with an intelligent data forwarder is discussed in this paper. The forwarder adopts a Hidden Markov Model for human behaviour recognition. Locality sensitive hashing is proposed as an efficient mechanism to learn sensor patterns. A prototype solution is implemented to monitor health conditions of dispersed users. It is shown that the intelligent forwarders can provide the remote sensors with context-awareness. They transmit only important information to the big data server for analytics when certain behaviours happen and avoid overwhelming communication and data storage. The system functions unobtrusively, whilst giving the users peace of mind in the knowledge that their safety is being monitored and analysed

    Review of state-of-the-art wireless technologies and applications in smart cities

    Get PDF
    There are increasing preferences to employ wireless communication technologies for high mobility, high scalability and low-cost applications in smart city development. This paper gives a brief synopsis of typical wireless technologies in smart city applications and the comparison analysis between them. The trend for smart city wireless technology is also presented. Examples, for several key applications within smart city development (healthcare, smart grid, localization) are studied and current advanced solutions supporting these applications are summarized with futuristic trends and demands are presented

    An experimental study of ZigBee for body sensor networks

    Get PDF
    We present an experimental performance evaluation of ZigBee networks in the context of data-intensive body sensor networks (BSNs). IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee devices were mainly developed for use in wireless sensors network (WSN) applications; however, due to characteristics such as low power and small form factor, they are also being widely used in BSN applications, making it necessary to evaluate their suitability in this context. The delivery ratio and end-to-end delay were evaluated, under contention, for both star and tree topologies. The reliability of the ZigBee network in a star topology without hidden nodes was very good (delivery ratio close to 100%), provided the acknowledgement mechanism was enabled. On the other hand, the performance in a tree topology was degraded due to router overload and the activation of the route maintenance protocol triggered by periods of high traffic load. The effect of the devices’ clock drift and hidden nodes on the reliability of the star network was modeled and validated through experimental tests. In these tests, the worst-case delivery ratio when the acknowledgment is used decreased to 90% with two sensor nodes, while for the non-acknowledged mode the result was of 13%. These results show that a mechanism for distributing the nodes’ traffic over the time is required to avoid BSN performance degradation caused by router overload, clock drift and hidden node issues.Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologi

    Proactive Highly Ambulatory Sensor Routing (PHASeR) protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a novel multihop routing protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks called PHASeR (Proactive Highly Ambulatory Sensor Routing). The proposed protocol uses a simple hop-count metric to enable the dynamic and robust routing of data towards the sink in mobile environments. It is motivated by the application of radiation mapping by unmanned vehicles, which requires the reliable and timely delivery of regular measurements to the sink. PHASeR maintains a gradient metric in mobile environments by using a global TDMA MAC layer. It also uses the technique of blind forwarding to pass messages through the network in a multipath manner. PHASeR is analysed mathematically based on packet delivery ratio, average packet delay, throughput and overhead. It is then simulated with varying mobility, scalability and traffic loads. The protocol gives good results over all measures, which suggests that it may also be suitable for a wider array of emerging applications

    Mobile clinical decision support systems and applications: a literature and commercial review

    Full text link
    The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-0004-y[EN] Background: The latest advances in eHealth and mHealth have propitiated the rapidly creation and expansion of mobile applications for health care. One of these types of applications are the clinical decision support systems, which nowadays are being implemented in mobile apps to facilitate the access to health care professionals in their daily clinical decisions. Objective: The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, to make a review of the current systems available in the literature and in commercial stores. Secondly, to analyze a sample of applications in order to obtain some conclusions and recommendations. Methods: Two reviews have been done: a literature review on Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Knowledge and PubMed and a commercial review on Google play and the App Store. Five applications from each review have been selected to develop an in-depth analysis and to obtain more information about the mobile clinical decision support systems. Results: 92 relevant papers and 192 commercial apps were found. 44 papers were focused only on mobile clinical decision support systems. 171 apps were available on Google play and 21 on the App Store. The apps are designed for general medicine and 37 different specialties, with some features common in all of them despite of the different medical fields objective. Conclusions: The number of mobile clinical decision support applications and their inclusion in clinical practices has risen in the last years. However, developers must be careful with their interface or the easiness of use, which can impoverish the experience of the users.This research has been partially supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain. This research has been partially supported by the ICT-248765 EU-FP7 Project. This research has been partially supported by the IPT-2011-1126-900000 project under the INNPACTO 2011 program, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.Martínez Pérez, B.; De La Torre Diez, I.; López Coronado, M.; Sainz De Abajo, B.; Robles Viejo, M.; García Gómez, JM. (2014). Mobile clinical decision support systems and applications: a literature and commercial review. Journal of Medical Systems. 38(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-0004-yS110381Van De Belt, T. H., Engelen, L. J., Berben, S. A., and Schoonhoven, L., Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010:12(2), 2012.Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M., and Jadad, A., What is eHealth (3): A systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 7(1):1, 2005. PMID: 15829471.World Health Organization (2011) mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies: Based on the findings of the second global survey on eHealth (Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Volume 3). World Health Organization. 2011. ISBN: 9789241564250Lin, C., Mobile telemedicine: A survey study. J Med Syst April 36(2):511–520, 2012.El Khaddar, M.A., Harroud, H., Boulmalf, M., Elkoutbi, M., Habbani, A., Emerging wireless technologies in e-health Trends, challenges, and framework design issues. 2012 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS). 440–445, 2012.Luanrattana, R., Win, K. T., Fulcher, J., and Iverson, D., Mobile technology use in medical education. J Med Syst 36(1):113–122, 2012.Yang, S. C., Mobile applications and 4 G wireless networks: A framework for analysis. Campus-Wide Information Systems 29(5):344–357, 2012.Kumar, B., Singh, S.P., Mohan, A., Emerging mobile communication technologies for health. 2010 International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology, ICCCT-2010; Allahabad; pp. 828–832, 2010.Yan, H., Huo, H., Xu, Y., and Gidlund, M., Wireless sensor network based E-health system—implementation and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 56(4):2288–2295, 2010.IDC (2013) Press release: Strong demand for smartphones and heated vendor competition characterize the worldwide mobile phone market at the end of 2012. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23916413#.UVBKiRdhWCn . Accessed 11 September 2013.IDC (2012) IDC Raises its worldwide tablet forecast on continued strong demand and forthcoming new product launches. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23696912#.US9x86JhWCl . Accessed 11 September 2013.International Data Corporation (2013) Android and iOS combine for 91.1 % of the worldwide smartphone OS market in 4Q12 and 87.6 % for the year. http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS23946013 . Accessed 11 September 2013.Jones, C., (2013) Apple and Google continue to gain US Smartphone market share. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2013/01/04/apple-and-google-continue-to-gain-us-smartphone-market-share/ . Accessed 11 September 2013.Apple (2013) iTunes. http://www.apple.com/itunes/ . Accessed 11 September 2013.Google (2013) Google play. https://play.google.com/store . Accessed 11 September 2013.Rowinski, D., (2013) The data doesn’t lie: iOS apps are better than android. Readwrite mobile. http://readwrite.com/2013/01/30/the-data-doesnt-lie-ios-apps-are-better-quality-than-android . Accessed 11 September 2013.Rajan, S. P., and Rajamony, S., Viable investigations and real-time recitation of enhanced ECG-based cardiac telemonitoring system for homecare applications: A systematic evaluation. Telemed J E Health 19(4):278–286, 2013.Logan, A. G., Transforming hypertension management using mobile health technology for telemonitoring and self-care support. Can J Cardiol 29(5):579–585, 2013.Tamrat, T., and Kachnowski, S., Special delivery: An analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J 16(5):1092–1101, 2012.Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., López-Coronado, M., and Herreros-González, J., Mobile Apps in Cardiology: Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 1(2):e15, 2013.de Wit HA, Mestres Gonzalvo C, Hurkens KP, Mulder WJ, Janknegt R, et al., Development of a computer system to support medication reviews in nursing homes. Int J Clin Pharm. 26, 2013.Dahlström, O., Thyberg, I., Hass, U., Skogh, T., and Timpka, T., Designing a decision support system for existing clinical organizational structures: Considerations from a rheumatology clinic. J Med Syst 30(5):325–31, 2006.Lambin P, Roelofs E, Reymen B, Velazquez ER, Buijsen J, et al., ‘Rapid learning health care in oncology’ - An approach towards decision support systems enabling customised radiotherapy’. Radiother Oncol. 27, 2013.Graham, T. A., Bullard, M. J., Kushniruk, A. W., Holroyd, B. R., and Rowe, B. H., Assessing the sensibility of two clinical decision support systems. J Med Syst 32(5):361–8, 2008.Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., and López-Coronado, M., Mobile health applications for the most prevalent conditions by the World Health Organization: Review and analysis. J Med Internet Res 15(6):e120, 2013.Savel, T. G., Lee, B. A., Ledbetter, G., Brown, S., LaValley, D., et al., PTT advisor: A CDC-supported initiative to develop a mobile clinical laboratory decision support application for the iOS platform. Online J Public Health Inform 5(2):215, 2013.Doctor Doctor Inc. (2009) iDoc. iTunes. https://itunes.apple.com/es/app/idoc/id328354734?mt=8 . Accessed 13 September 2013.Hardyman, W., Bullock, A., Brown, A., Carter-Ingram, S., and Stacey, M., Mobile technology supporting trainee doctors’ workplace learning and patient care: An evaluation. BMC Med Educ 13:6, 2013.Lee, N. J., Chen, E. S., Currie, L. M., Donovan, M., Hall, E. K., et al., The effect of a mobile clinical decision support system on the diagnosis of obesity and overweight in acute and primary care encounters. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 32(3):211–21, 2009.Divall, P., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., and Baker, R., The use of personal digital assistants in clinical decision making by health care professionals: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 19(1):16–28, 2013.Chignell, M, and Yesha, Y, Lo, J., New methods for clinical decision support in hospitals. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (CASCON’10). Toronto, ON; Canada, 2010Charani, E., Kyratsis, Y., Lawson, W., Wickens, H., Brannigan, E. T., et al., An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: Lessons learnt. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(4):960–7, 2013.Klucken, J., Barth, J., Kugler, P., Schlachetzki, J., Henze, T., et al., Unbiased and mobile gait analysis detects motor impairment in Parkinson’s disease. PLoS One 8(2):e56956, 2013.Hervás, R., Fontecha, J., Ausín, D., Castanedo, F., Bravo, J., et al., Mobile monitoring and reasoning methods to prevent cardiovascular diseases. Sensors (Basel) 13(5):6524–41, 2013.Di Noia, T., Ostuni, V. C., Pesce, F., Binetti, G., Naso, N., et al., An end stage kidney disease predictor based on an artificial neural networks ensemble. Expert Syst Appl 40(11):4438–4445, 2013.Velikova, M., van Scheltinga, J. T., Lucas, P. J. F., and Spaanderman, M., Exploiting causal functional relationships in Bayesian network modelling for personalised healthcare. Int J Approx Reason, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2013.03.016 .Medical Data Solutions (2012) Pediatric clinical pathways. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ipathways . Accessed 17 September 2013.QxMD Medical Software Inc. (2013) Calculate by QxMD. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.qxmd.calculate . Accessed 17 September 2013.Skyscape (2012) ACC pocket guides. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skyscape.packagefiveepkthreeundata.android.voucher.ui . Accessed 17 September 2013.Skyscape (2013) Skyscape medical resources. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.skyscape.android.ui&hl=en . Accessed 17 September 2013.Pieter Kubben, M.D., (2012) NeuroMind. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.dign.NeuroMind . Accessed 17 September 2013.Mobile Systems, Inc. (2013) 2013 Medical diagnosis TR. Google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mobisystems.msdict.embedded.wireless.mcgrawhill.cmdt2013 . Accessed 17 September 2013.World Health Organization (2013) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf . Accessed 18 September 2013.Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., Candelas-Plasencia, S., and López-Coronado, M., Development and evaluation of tools for measuring the Quality of Experience (QoE) in mHealth applications. J Med Syst 37(5):9976, 2013
    corecore