Time and multiple objectives in scheduling and routing problems

Many optimization problems encountered in practice are multi-objective by nature, i.e., different objectives are conflicting and equally important. Many times, it is not desirable to drop some of them or to optimize them in a composite single objective or hierarchical manner. Furthermore, cost parameters change over time which makes optimization problems harder. For instance, in the transport sector, travel costs are a function of travel time which changes depending on the time of the day a vehicle is travelling (e.g., due to road congestion). Road congestion results in tremendous delays which lead to a decrease in the service quality and the responsiveness of logistic service providers. In Chapter 2, we develop a generic approach to deal with Multi-Objective Scheduling Problems (MOSPs) with State-Dependent Cost Parameters. The aim is to determine the set of Pareto solutions that capture the trade offs between the different conflicting objectives. Due to the complexity of MOSPs, an efficient approximation based on dynamic programming is developed. The approximation has a provable worse case performance guarantee. Even though the generated approximate Pareto front consist of fewer solutions, it still represents a good coverage of the true Pareto front. Furthermore, considerable gains in computation times are achieved. In Chapter 3, the developed methodology is validated on the multi-objective timedependent knapsack problem. In the classical knapsack problem, the input consists of a knapsack with a finite capacity and a set of items, each with a certain weight and a cost. A feasible solution to the knapsack problem is a selection of items such that their total weight does not exceed the knapsack capacity. The goal is to maximize the single objective function consisting of the total pro t of the selected items. We extend the classical knapsack problem in two ways. First, we consider time-dependent profits (e.g., in a retail environment profit depends on whether it is Christmas or not)

Knapsack Problems with Side Constraints

The thesis considers a specific class of resource allocation problems in Combinatorial Optimization: the Knapsack Problems. These are paradigmatic NP-hard problems where a set of items with given profits and weights is available. The aim is to select a subset of the items in order to maximize the total profit without exceeding a known knapsack capacity. In the classical 0-1 Knapsack Problem (KP), each item can be picked at most once. The focus of the thesis is on four generalizations of KP involving side constraints beyond the capacity bound. More precisely, we provide solution approaches and insights for the following problems: The Knapsack Problem with Setups; the Collapsing Knapsack Problem; the Penalized Knapsack Problem; the Incremental Knapsack Problem. These problems reveal challenging research topics with many real-life applications. The scientific contributions we provide are both from a theoretical and a practical perspective. On the one hand, we give insights into structural elements and properties of the problems and derive a series of approximation results for some of them. On the other hand, we offer valuable solution approaches for direct applications of practical interest or when the problems considered arise as sub-problems in broader contexts

Nonapproximability Results for Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes

We show that for several variations of partially observable Markov decision processes, polynomial-time algorithms for finding control policies are unlikely to or simply don't have guarantees of finding policies within a constant factor or a constant summand of optimal. Here "unlikely" means "unless some complexity classes collapse," where the collapses considered are P=NP, P=PSPACE, or P=EXP. Until or unless these collapses are shown to hold, any control-policy designer must choose between such performance guarantees and efficient computation

Fully polynomial-time approximation schemes for time–cost tradeoff problems in series–parallel project networks

2009-2010 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journalAccepted ManuscriptPublishe

The Network Improvement Problem for Equilibrium Routing

In routing games, agents pick their routes through a network to minimize their own delay. A primary concern for the network designer in routing games is the average agent delay at equilibrium. A number of methods to control this average delay have received substantial attention, including network tolls, Stackelberg routing, and edge removal. A related approach with arguably greater practical relevance is that of making investments in improvements to the edges of the network, so that, for a given investment budget, the average delay at equilibrium in the improved network is minimized. This problem has received considerable attention in the literature on transportation research and a number of different algorithms have been studied. To our knowledge, none of this work gives guarantees on the output quality of any polynomial-time algorithm. We study a model for this problem introduced in transportation research literature, and present both hardness results and algorithms that obtain nearly optimal performance guarantees. - We first show that a simple algorithm obtains good approximation guarantees for the problem. Despite its simplicity, we show that for affine delays the approximation ratio of 4/3 obtained by the algorithm cannot be improved. - To obtain better results, we then consider restricted topologies. For graphs consisting of parallel paths with affine delay functions we give an optimal algorithm. However, for graphs that consist of a series of parallel links, we show the problem is weakly NP-hard. - Finally, we consider the problem in series-parallel graphs, and give an FPTAS for this case. Our work thus formalizes the intuition held by transportation researchers that the network improvement problem is hard, and presents topology-dependent algorithms that have provably tight approximation guarantees.Comment: 27 pages (including abstract), 3 figure