9 research outputs found
(k,1)-coloring of sparse graphs
AbstractA graph G is (k,1)-colorable if the vertex set of G can be partitioned into subsets V1 and V2 such that the graph G[V1] induced by the vertices of V1 has maximum degree at most k and the graph G[V2] induced by the vertices of V2 has maximum degree at most 1. We prove that every graph with maximum average degree less than 10k+223k+9 admits a (k,1)-coloring, where k≥2. In particular, every planar graph with girth at least 7 is (2,1)-colorable, while every planar graph with girth at least 6 is (5,1)-colorable. On the other hand, when k≥2 we construct non-(k,1)-colorable graphs whose maximum average degree is arbitrarily close to 14k4k+1
Defective and Clustered Choosability of Sparse Graphs
An (improper) graph colouring has "defect" if each monochromatic subgraph
has maximum degree at most , and has "clustering" if each monochromatic
component has at most vertices. This paper studies defective and clustered
list-colourings for graphs with given maximum average degree. We prove that
every graph with maximum average degree less than is
-choosable with defect . This improves upon a similar result by Havet and
Sereni [J. Graph Theory, 2006]. For clustered choosability of graphs with
maximum average degree , no bound on the number of colours
was previously known. The above result with solves this problem. It
implies that every graph with maximum average degree is
-choosable with clustering 2. This extends a
result of Kopreski and Yu [Discrete Math., 2017] to the setting of
choosability. We then prove two results about clustered choosability that
explore the trade-off between the number of colours and the clustering. In
particular, we prove that every graph with maximum average degree is
-choosable with clustering , and is
-choosable with clustering . As an
example, the later result implies that every biplanar graph is 8-choosable with
bounded clustering. This is the best known result for the clustered version of
the earth-moon problem. The results extend to the setting where we only
consider the maximum average degree of subgraphs with at least some number of
vertices. Several applications are presented
Defective DP-colorings of sparse simple graphs
DP-coloring (also known as correspondence coloring) is a generalization of
list coloring developed recently by Dvo\v{r}\'ak and Postle. We introduce and
study -defective DP-colorings of simple graphs. Let be
the minimum number of edges in an -vertex DP--critical graph. In this
paper we determine sharp bound on for each and for infinitely many .Comment: 17 page
Generalized Colorings of Graphs
A graph coloring is an assignment of labels called “colors” to certain elements of a graph subject to certain constraints. The proper vertex coloring is the most common type of graph coloring, where each vertex of a graph is assigned one color such that no two adjacent vertices share the same color, with the objective of minimizing the number of colors used. One can obtain various generalizations of the proper vertex coloring problem, by strengthening or relaxing the constraints or changing the objective. We study several types of such generalizations in this thesis. Series-parallel graphs are multigraphs that have no K4-minor. We provide bounds on their fractional and circular chromatic numbers and the defective version of these pa-rameters. In particular we show that the fractional chromatic number of any series-parallel graph of odd girth k is exactly 2k/(k − 1), confirming a conjecture by Wang and Yu. We introduce a generalization of defective coloring: each vertex of a graph is assigned a fraction of each color, with the total amount of colors at each vertex summing to 1. We define the fractional defect of a vertex v to be the sum of the overlaps with each neighbor of v, and the fractional defect of the graph to be the maximum of the defects over all vertices. We provide results on the minimum fractional defect of 2-colorings of some graphs. We also propose some open questions and conjectures. Given a (not necessarily proper) vertex coloring of a graph, a subgraph is called rainbow if all its vertices receive different colors, and monochromatic if all its vertices receive the same color. We consider several types of coloring here: a no-rainbow-F coloring of G is a coloring of the vertices of G without rainbow subgraph isomorphic to F ; an F -WORM coloring of G is a coloring of the vertices of G without rainbow or monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to F ; an (M, R)-WORM coloring of G is a coloring of the vertices of G with neither a monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to M nor a rainbow subgraph isomorphic to R. We present some results on these concepts especially with regards to the existence of colorings, complexity, and optimization within certain graph classes. Our focus is on the case that F , M or R is a path, cycle, star, or clique