The multi-program performance model: debunking current practice in multi-core simulation

Composing a representative multi-program multi-core workload is non-trivial. A multi-core processor can execute multiple independent programs concurrently, and hence, any program mix can form a potential multi-program workload. Given the very large number of possible multiprogram workloads and the limited speed of current simulation methods, it is impossible to evaluate all possible multi-program workloads. This paper presents the Multi-Program Performance Model (MPPM), a method for quickly estimating multiprogram multi-core performance based on single-core simulation runs. MPPM employs an iterative method to model the tight performance entanglement between co-executing programs on a multi-core processor with shared caches. Because MPPM involves analytical modeling, it is very fast, and it estimates multi-core performance for a very large number of multi-program workloads in a reasonable amount of time. In addition, it provides confidence bounds on its performance estimates. Using SPEC CPU2006 and up to 16 cores, we report an average performance prediction error of 2.3% and 2.9% for system throughput (STP) and average normalized turnaround time (ANTT), respectively, while being up to five orders of magnitude faster than detailed simulation. Subsequently, we demonstrate that randomly picking a limited number of multi-program workloads, as done in current pactice, can lead to incorrect design decisions in practical design and research studies, which is alleviated using MPPM. In addition, MPPM can be used to quickly identify multi-program workloads that stress multi-core performance through excessive conflict behavior in shared caches; these stress workloads can then be used for driving the design process further

Pac-Sim: Simulation of Multi-threaded Workloads using Intelligent, Live Sampling

High-performance, multi-core processors are the key to accelerating workloads in several application domains. To continue to scale performance at the limit of Moore's Law and Dennard scaling, software and hardware designers have turned to dynamic solutions that adapt to the needs of applications in a transparent, automatic way. For example, modern hardware improves its performance and power efficiency by changing the hardware configuration, like the frequency and voltage of cores, according to a number of parameters such as the technology used, the workload running, etc. With this level of dynamism, it is essential to simulate next-generation multi-core processors in a way that can both respond to system changes and accurately determine system performance metrics. Currently, no sampled simulation platform can achieve these goals of dynamic, fast, and accurate simulation of multi-threaded workloads. In this work, we propose a solution that allows for fast, accurate simulation in the presence of both hardware and software dynamism. To accomplish this goal, we present Pac-Sim, a novel sampled simulation methodology for fast, accurate sampled simulation that requires no upfront analysis of the workload. With our proposed methodology, it is now possible to simulate long-running dynamically scheduled multi-threaded programs with significant simulation speedups even in the presence of dynamic hardware events. We evaluate Pac-Sim using the multi-threaded SPEC CPU2017, NPB, and PARSEC benchmarks with both static and dynamic thread scheduling. The experimental results show that Pac-Sim achieves a very low sampling error of 1.63% and 3.81% on average for statically and dynamically scheduled benchmarks, respectively. Pac-Sim also demonstrates significant simulation speedups as high as 523.5$\times$ (210.3$\times$ on average) for the train input set of SPEC CPU2017.Comment: 14 pages, 14 figure

Modeling and scheduling heterogeneous multi-core architectures

Om de prestatie van toekomstige processors en processorarchitecturen te evalueren wordt vaak gebruik gemaakt van een simulator die het gedrag en de prestatie van de processor modelleert. De prestatie bepalen van de uitvoering van een computerprogramma op een gegeven processorarchitectuur m.b.v. een simulator duurt echter vele grootteordes langer dan de werkelijke uitvoeringstijd. Dit beperkt in belangrijke mate de hoeveelheid experimenten die gedaan kunnen worden. In dit doctoraatswerk werd het Multi-Program Performance Model (MPPM) ontwikkeld, een innovatief alternatief voor traditionele simulatie, dat het mogelijk maakt om tot 100.000x sneller een processorconfiguratie te evalueren. MPPM laat ons toe om nooit geziene exploraties te doen. Gebruik makend van dit raamwerk hebben we aangetoond dat de taakplanning cruciaal is om heterogene meerkernige processors optimaal te benutten. Vervolgens werd een nieuwe manier voorgesteld om op een schaalbare manier de taakplanning uit te voeren, namelijk Performance Impact Estimation (PIE). Tijdens de uitvoering van een draad op een gegeven processorkern schatten we de prestatie op een ander type kern op basis van eenvoudig op te meten prestatiemetrieken. Zo beschikken we op elk moment over alle nodige informatie om een efficiënte taakplanning te doen. Dit laat ons bovendien toe te optimaliseren voor verschillende criteria zoals uitvoeringstijd, doorvoersnelheid of fairness

Variation-Tolerant Non-Uniform 3D Cache Management in Memory Stacked Multi-Core Processors

Process variations in integrated circuits have significant impact on their performance, leakage and stability. This is particularly evident in large, regular and dense structures such as DRAMs. DRAMs are built using minimized transistors with presumably uniform speed in an organized array structure. Process variation can introduce latency disparity among different memory arrays. With the proliferation of 3D stacking technology, DRAMs become a favorable choice for stacking on top of a multi-core processor as a last level cache for large capacity, high bandwidth, and low power. Hence, variations in bank speed create a unique problem of non-uniform cache accesses in the 3D space.In this thesis, we investigate cache management techniques for tolerating process variation in a 3D DRAM stacked onto a multi-core processor. We modeled the process variation in a 4-layer DRAM memory to characterize the latency variations among different banks. As a result, the notion of fast and slow banks from the core's standpoint is no longer associated with their physical distances with the banks. They are determined by the different bank latencies due to process variation. We develop cache migration schemes that utilize fast banks while limiting the cost due to migration. Our experiments show that there is a great performance benefit in exploiting fast memory banks through migration. On average, a variation-aware management can improve the performance of a workload over the baseline (where the speed of the slowest bank is assumed for all banks) by 17.8%. We are also only 0.45% away in performance from an ideal memory where no PV is present

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationWith the explosion of chip transistor counts, the semiconductor industry has struggled with ways to continue scaling computing performance in line with historical trends. In recent years, the de facto solution to utilize excess transistors has been to increase the size of the on-chip data cache, allowing fast access to an increased portion of main memory. These large caches allowed the continued scaling of single thread performance, which had not yet reached the limit of instruction level parallelism (ILP). As we approach the potential limits of parallelism within a single threaded application, new approaches such as chip multiprocessors (CMP) have become popular for scaling performance utilizing thread level parallelism (TLP). This dissertation identifies the operating system as a ubiquitous area where single threaded performance and multithreaded performance have often been ignored by computer architects. We propose that novel hardware and OS co-design has the potential to significantly improve current chip multiprocessor designs, enabling increased performance and improved power efficiency. We show that the operating system contributes a nontrivial overhead to even the most computationally intense workloads and that this OS contribution grows to a significant fraction of total instructions when executing several common applications found in the datacenter. We demonstrate that architectural improvements have had little to no effect on the performance of the OS over the last 15 years, leaving ample room for improvements. We specifically consider three potential solutions to improve OS execution on modern processors. First, we consider the potential of a separate operating system processor (OSP) operating concurrently with general purpose processors (GPP) in a chip multiprocessor organization, with several specialized structures acting as efficient conduits between these processors. Second, we consider the potential of segregating existing caching structures to decrease cache interference between the OS and application. Third, we propose that there are components within the OS itself that should be refactored to be both multithreaded and cache topology aware, which in turn, improves the performance and scalability of many-threaded applications

Most Progress Made Algorithm: Combating Synchronization Induced Performance Loss on Salvaged Chip Multi-Processors

Recent increases in hard fault rates in modern chip multi-processors have led to a variety of approaches to try and save manufacturing yield. Among these are: fine-grain fault tolerance (such as error correction coding, redundant cache lines, and redundant functional units), and large-grain fault tolerance (such as disabling of faulty cores, adding extra cores, and core salvaging techniques). This paper considers the case of core salvaging techniques and the heterogeneous performance introduced when these techniques have some salvaged and some non-faulty cores. It proposes a hypervisor-based hardware thread scheduler, triggered by detection of spin locks and thread imbalance, that mitigates the loss of throughput resulting from this het- erogeneity. Specifically, a new algorithm, called Most ProgressMade algorithm, reduces the number of synchronization locks held on a salvaged core and balances the time each thread in an application spends running on that core. For some benchmarks, the results show as much as a 2.68x increase in performance over a salvaged chip multi-processor without this technique

A comparison of cache hierarchies for SMT processors

In the multithread and multicore era, programs are forced to share part of the processor structures. On one hand, the state of the art in multithreading describes how efficiently manage and distribute inner resources such as reorder buffer or issue windows. On the other hand, there is a substantial body of works focused on outer resources, mainly on how to effectively share last level caches in multicores. Between these ends, first and second level caches have remained apart even if they are shared in most commercial multithreaded processors. This work analyzes multiprogrammed workloads as the worst-case scenario for cache sharing among threads. In order to obtain representative results, we present a sampling-based methodology that for multiple metrics such as STP, ANTT, IPC throughput, or fairness, reduces simulation time up to 4 orders of magnitude when running 8-thread workloads with an error lower than 3% and a confidence level of 97%. With the above mentioned methodology, we compare several state-of-the-art cache hierarchies, and observe that Light NUCA provides performance benefits in SMT processors regardless the organization of the last level cache. Most importantly, Light NUCA gains are consistent across the entire number of simulated threads, from one to eight.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft