using intersection information to map stimulus information transfer within neural networks

Abstract Analytical tools that estimate the directed information flow between simultaneously recorded neural populations, such as directed information or Granger causality, typically focus on measuring how much information is exchanged between such populations. However, understanding how sensory information is processed through the brain and how it is used to generate behaviors requires estimating specifically the amount of stimulus information that is transmitted. Here we use the concept of intersection information to make progress on how to perform this measure. We develop the concept of transmitted intersection information, which measures how much of the stimulus information present in one population at a certain time is transmitted to a second population at a later time. We show that this measure of stimulus-specific information transfer has several appealing properties, such as being non-negative, and being bounded by the amount of stimulus information present in each of the two populations and by the total amount of information transmitted between the two populations. Applying this measure to simulated neurons or pools of neurons connected by feed-forward synapses, we show that it can discern cases when the information transmitted from one population to another is about specific stimulus features encoded by the sending population from cases in which the information transmitted is not about the stimuli. We also show that this measure has a good statistical sensitivity from trial numbers that can be collected in real data. Our results highlight the promise of using the concept of intersection information to map stimulus-specific information transfer across neural populations

How is Gaze Influenced by Image Transformations? Dataset and Model

Data size is the bottleneck for developing deep saliency models, because collecting eye-movement data is very time consuming and expensive. Most of current studies on human attention and saliency modeling have used high quality stereotype stimuli. In real world, however, captured images undergo various types of transformations. Can we use these transformations to augment existing saliency datasets? Here, we first create a novel saliency dataset including fixations of 10 observers over 1900 images degraded by 19 types of transformations. Second, by analyzing eye movements, we find that observers look at different locations over transformed versus original images. Third, we utilize the new data over transformed images, called data augmentation transformation (DAT), to train deep saliency models. We find that label preserving DATs with negligible impact on human gaze boost saliency prediction, whereas some other DATs that severely impact human gaze degrade the performance. These label preserving valid augmentation transformations provide a solution to enlarge existing saliency datasets. Finally, we introduce a novel saliency model based on generative adversarial network (dubbed GazeGAN). A modified UNet is proposed as the generator of the GazeGAN, which combines classic skip connections with a novel center-surround connection (CSC), in order to leverage multi level features. We also propose a histogram loss based on Alternative Chi Square Distance (ACS HistLoss) to refine the saliency map in terms of luminance distribution. Extensive experiments and comparisons over 3 datasets indicate that GazeGAN achieves the best performance in terms of popular saliency evaluation metrics, and is more robust to various perturbations. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/CZHQuality/Sal-CFS-GAN

Characterizing and comparing acoustic representations in convolutional neural networks and the human auditory system

Le traitement auditif dans le cerveau humain et dans les systèmes informatiques consiste en une cascade de transformations représentationnelles qui extraient et réorganisent les informations pertinentes pour permettre l'exécution des tâches. Cette thèse s'intéresse à la nature des représentations acoustiques et aux principes de conception et d'apprentissage qui soutiennent leur développement. Les objectifs scientifiques sont de caractériser et de comparer les représentations auditives dans les réseaux de neurones convolutionnels profonds (CNN) et la voie auditive humaine. Ce travail soulève plusieurs questions méta-scientifiques sur la nature du progrès scientifique, qui sont également considérées. L'introduction passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur la voie auditive des mammifères et présente les concepts pertinents de l'apprentissage profond. Le premier article soutient que les questions philosophiques les plus pressantes à l'intersection de l'intelligence artificielle et biologique concernent finalement la définition des phénomènes à expliquer et ce qui constitue des explications valables de tels phénomènes. Je surligne les théories pertinentes de l'explication scientifique que j’espére fourniront un échafaudage pour de futures discussions. L'article 2 teste un modèle populaire de cortex auditif basé sur des modulations spectro-temporelles. Nous constatons qu'un modèle linéaire entraîné uniquement sur les réponses BOLD aux ondulations dynamiques simples (contenant seulement une fréquence fondamentale, un taux de modulation temporelle et une échelle spectrale) peut se généraliser pour prédire les réponses aux mélanges de deux ondulations dynamiques. Le troisième article caractérise la spécificité linguistique des couches CNN et explore l'effet de l'entraînement figé et des poids aléatoires. Nous avons observé trois régions distinctes de transférabilité: (1) les deux premières couches étaient entièrement transférables, (2) les couches 2 à 8 étaient également hautement transférables, mais nous avons trouvé évidence de spécificité de la langue, (3) les couches suivantes entièrement connectées étaient plus spécifiques à la langue mais pouvaient être adaptées sur la langue cible. Dans l'article 4, nous utilisons l'analyse de similarité pour constater que la performance supérieure de l'entraînement figé obtenues à l'article 3 peuvent être attribuées aux différences de représentation dans l'avant-dernière couche: la deuxième couche entièrement connectée. Nous analysons également les réseaux aléatoires de l'article 3, dont nous concluons que la forme représentationnelle est doublement contrainte par l'architecture et la forme de l'entrée et de la cible. Pour tester si les CNN acoustiques apprennent une hiérarchie de représentation similaire à celle du système auditif humain, le cinquième article compare l'activité des réseaux «freeze trained» de l'article 3 à l'activité IRMf 7T dans l'ensemble du système auditif humain. Nous ne trouvons aucune évidence d'une hiérarchie de représentation partagée et constatons plutôt que tous nos régions auditifs étaient les plus similaires à la première couche entièrement connectée. Enfin, le chapitre de discussion passe en revue les mérites et les limites d'une approche d'apprentissage profond aux neurosciences dans un cadre de comparaison de modèles. Ensemble, ces travaux contribuent à l'entreprise naissante de modélisation du système auditif avec des réseaux de neurones et constituent un petit pas vers une science unifiée de l'intelligence qui étudie les phénomènes qui se manifestent dans l'intelligence biologique et artificielle.Auditory processing in the human brain and in contemporary machine hearing systems consists of a cascade of representational transformations that extract and reorganize relevant information to enable task performance. This thesis is concerned with the nature of acoustic representations and the network design and learning principles that support their development. The primary scientific goals are to characterize and compare auditory representations in deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and the human auditory pathway. This work prompts several meta-scientific questions about the nature of scientific progress, which are also considered. The introduction reviews what is currently known about the mammalian auditory pathway and introduces the relevant concepts in deep learning.The first article argues that the most pressing philosophical questions at the intersection of artificial and biological intelligence are ultimately concerned with defining the phenomena to be explained and with what constitute valid explanations of such phenomena. I highlight relevant theories of scientific explanation which we hope will provide scaffolding for future discussion. Article 2 tests a popular model of auditory cortex based on frequency-specific spectrotemporal modulations. We find that a linear model trained only on BOLD responses to simple dynamic ripples (containing only one fundamental frequency, temporal modulation rate, and spectral scale) can generalize to predict responses to mixtures of two dynamic ripples. Both the third and fourth article investigate how CNN representations are affected by various aspects of training. The third article characterizes the language specificity of CNN layers and explores the effect of freeze training and random weights. We observed three distinct regions of transferability: (1) the first two layers were entirely transferable between languages, (2) layers 2--8 were also highly transferable but we found some evidence of language specificity, (3) the subsequent fully connected layers were more language specific but could be successfully finetuned to the target language. In Article 4, we use similarity analysis to find that the superior performance of freeze training achieved in Article 3 can be largely attributed to representational differences in the penultimate layer: the second fully connected layer. We also analyze the random networks from Article 3, from which we conclude that representational form is doubly constrained by architecture and the form of the input and target. To test whether acoustic CNNs learn a similar representational hierarchy as that of the human auditory system, the fifth article presents a similarity analysis to compare the activity of the freeze trained networks from Article 3 to 7T fMRI activity throughout the human auditory system. We find no evidence of a shared representational hierarchy and instead find that all of our auditory regions were most similar to the first fully connected layer. Finally, the discussion chapter reviews the merits and limitations of a deep learning approach to neuroscience in a model comparison framework. Together, these works contribute to the nascent enterprise of modeling the auditory system with neural networks and constitute a small step towards a unified science of intelligence that studies the phenomena that are exhibited in both biological and artificial intelligence