480 research outputs found

    Fast Untethered Soft Robotic Crawler with Elastic Instability

    Full text link
    High-speed locomotion of animals gives them tremendous advantages in exploring, hunting, and escaping from predators in varying environments. Enlightened by the fast-running gait of mammals like cheetahs and wolves, we designed and fabricated a single-servo-driving untethered soft robot that is capable of galloping at a speed of 313 mm/s or 1.56 body length per second (BL/s), 5.2 times and 2.6 times faster than the reported fastest predecessors in mm/s and BL/s, respectively, in literature. An in-plane prestressed hair clip mechanism (HCM) made up of semi-rigid materials like plastic is used as the supporting chassis, the compliant spine, and the muscle force amplifier of the robot at the same time, enabling the robot to be rapid and strong. The influence of factors including actuation frequency, substrates, tethering/untethering, and symmetric/asymmetric actuation is explored with experiments. Based on previous work, this paper further demonstrated the potential of HCM in addressing the speed problem of soft robots

    Design and development of wall climbing robot

    Get PDF
    This research work presents the design of a robot capable of climbing vertical and rough planes, such as stucco walls. Such a capacity offers imperative non military person and military preferences, for example, observation, perception, look and recover and actually for diversion and amusements. The robot's locomotion is performed using rack and pinion mechanism and adhesion to wall is performed by sticking using suction cups. The detailed design is modelled and fabrication is performed. It utilizes two legs, each with two degrees of freedom. And a central box containing the required mechanisms to perform the locomotion and adhesion is designed to carry any device to perform works on wall. A model of the robot is fabricated in a workshop using general tools. This model show how the mechanisms in the robot will work and how they are assembled together

    Extreme Parkour with Legged Robots

    Full text link
    Humans can perform parkour by traversing obstacles in a highly dynamic fashion requiring precise eye-muscle coordination and movement. Getting robots to do the same task requires overcoming similar challenges. Classically, this is done by independently engineering perception, actuation, and control systems to very low tolerances. This restricts them to tightly controlled settings such as a predetermined obstacle course in labs. In contrast, humans are able to learn parkour through practice without significantly changing their underlying biology. In this paper, we take a similar approach to developing robot parkour on a small low-cost robot with imprecise actuation and a single front-facing depth camera for perception which is low-frequency, jittery, and prone to artifacts. We show how a single neural net policy operating directly from a camera image, trained in simulation with large-scale RL, can overcome imprecise sensing and actuation to output highly precise control behavior end-to-end. We show our robot can perform a high jump on obstacles 2x its height, long jump across gaps 2x its length, do a handstand and run across tilted ramps, and generalize to novel obstacle courses with different physical properties. Parkour videos at https://extreme-parkour.github.io/Comment: Website and videos at https://extreme-parkour.github.io

    On Adjustable Stiffness Artificial Tendonsin Bipedal Walking Energetics

    Get PDF

    A Pendulum-Driven Legless Rolling Jumping Robot

    Full text link
    In this paper, we present a novel rolling, jumping robot. The robot consists of a driven pendulum mounted to a wheel in a compact, lightweight, 3D printed design. We show that by driving the pendulum to shift the robot's weight distribution, the robot is able to obtain significant rolling speed, achieve jumps of up to 2.5 body lengths vertically, and clear horizontal distances of over 6 body lengths. The robot's dynamic model is derived and simulation results indicate that it is consistent with the rolling motion and jumping observed on the robot. The ability to both roll and jump effectively using a minimalistic design makes this robot unique and could inspire the use of similar mechanisms on robots intended for applications in which agile locomotion on unstructured terrain is necessary, such as disaster response or planetary exploration.Comment: Final version of paper in IROS 2023. View the supplemental video at https://youtu.be/9hKQilCpea

    Bio-Inspired Robotics

    Get PDF
    Modern robotic technologies have enabled robots to operate in a variety of unstructured and dynamically-changing environments, in addition to traditional structured environments. Robots have, thus, become an important element in our everyday lives. One key approach to develop such intelligent and autonomous robots is to draw inspiration from biological systems. Biological structure, mechanisms, and underlying principles have the potential to provide new ideas to support the improvement of conventional robotic designs and control. Such biological principles usually originate from animal or even plant models, for robots, which can sense, think, walk, swim, crawl, jump or even fly. Thus, it is believed that these bio-inspired methods are becoming increasingly important in the face of complex applications. Bio-inspired robotics is leading to the study of innovative structures and computing with sensoryโ€“motor coordination and learning to achieve intelligence, flexibility, stability, and adaptation for emergent robotic applications, such as manipulation, learning, and control. This Special Issue invites original papers of innovative ideas and concepts, new discoveries and improvements, and novel applications and business models relevant to the selected topics of ``Bio-Inspired Robotics''. Bio-Inspired Robotics is a broad topic and an ongoing expanding field. This Special Issue collates 30 papers that address some of the important challenges and opportunities in this broad and expanding field

    Humanoid Robots

    Get PDF
    For many years, the human being has been trying, in all ways, to recreate the complex mechanisms that form the human body. Such task is extremely complicated and the results are not totally satisfactory. However, with increasing technological advances based on theoretical and experimental researches, man gets, in a way, to copy or to imitate some systems of the human body. These researches not only intended to create humanoid robots, great part of them constituting autonomous systems, but also, in some way, to offer a higher knowledge of the systems that form the human body, objectifying possible applications in the technology of rehabilitation of human beings, gathering in a whole studies related not only to Robotics, but also to Biomechanics, Biomimmetics, Cybernetics, among other areas. This book presents a series of researches inspired by this ideal, carried through by various researchers worldwide, looking for to analyze and to discuss diverse subjects related to humanoid robots. The presented contributions explore aspects about robotic hands, learning, language, vision and locomotion

    ๋™์˜์ƒ ์† ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋™์ž‘์˜ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2021. 2. ์ด์ œํฌ.In computer graphics, simulating and analyzing human movement have been interesting research topics started since the 1960s. Still, simulating realistic human movements in a 3D virtual world is a challenging task in computer graphics. In general, motion capture techniques have been used. Although the motion capture data guarantees realistic result and high-quality data, there is lots of equipment required to capture motion, and the process is complicated. Recently, 3D human pose estimation techniques from the 2D video are remarkably developed. Researchers in computer graphics and computer vision have attempted to reconstruct the various human motions from video data. However, existing methods can not robustly estimate dynamic actions and not work on videos filmed with a moving camera. In this thesis, we propose methods to reconstruct dynamic human motions from in-the-wild videos and to control the motions. First, we developed a framework to reconstruct motion from videos using prior physics knowledge. For dynamic motions such as backspin, the poses estimated by a state-of-the-art method are incomplete and include unreliable root trajectory or lack intermediate poses. We designed a reward function using poses and hints extracted from videos in the deep reinforcement learning controller and learned a policy to simultaneously reconstruct motion and control a virtual character. Second, we simulated figure skating movements in video. Skating sequences consist of fast and dynamic movements on ice, hindering the acquisition of motion data. Thus, we extracted 3D key poses from a video to then successfully replicate several figure skating movements using trajectory optimization and a deep reinforcement learning controller. Third, we devised an algorithm for gait analysis through video of patients with movement disorders. After acquiring the patients joint positions from 2D video processed by a deep learning network, the 3D absolute coordinates were estimated, and gait parameters such as gait velocity, cadence, and step length were calculated. Additionally, we analyzed the optimization criteria of human walking by using a 3D musculoskeletal humanoid model and physics-based simulation. For two criteria, namely, the minimization of muscle activation and joint torque, we compared simulation data with real human data for analysis. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the first two research topics, we verified the reconstruction of dynamic human motions from 2D videos using physics-based simulations. For the last two research topics, we evaluated our results with real human data.์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์—์„œ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„์€ 1960 ๋…„๋Œ€๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค๋ฃจ์–ด์ง„ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กœ์šด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ช‡ ์‹ญ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์–ด ์™”์Œ์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , 3์ฐจ์› ๊ฐ€์ƒ ๊ณต๊ฐ„ ์ƒ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ต๊ณ  ๋„์ „์ ์ธ ์ฃผ์ œ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋™์•ˆ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์™”๋‹ค. ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ฒ˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์™€ ๊ณ ํ’ˆ์งˆ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์žฅํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ๋ชจ์…˜ ์บก์ณ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ์žฅ๋น„๋“ค์ด ๋งŽ๊ณ , ๊ทธ ๊ณผ์ •์ด ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์— 2์ฐจ์› ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ 3์ฐจ์› ์ž์„ธ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ด ๊ด„๋ชฉํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”ฝ์Šค์™€ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ๋น„์ ผ ๋ถ„์•ผ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋“ค์€ ๋น„๋””์˜ค ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ์‹œ๋„๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์€ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ๋‹ค์ด๋‚˜๋ฏนํ•œ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •ํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์›€์ง์ด๋Š” ์นด๋ฉ”๋ผ๋กœ ์ดฌ์˜ํ•œ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ž‘๋™ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋™์ž‘์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ  ๋™์ž‘์„ ์ œ์–ดํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์‚ฌ์ „ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌํ•™ ์ง€์‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ๋ชจ์…˜์„ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ํ”„๋ ˆ์ž„ ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณต์ค‘์ œ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ์ตœ์‹  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋™์›ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ •๋œ ์ž์„ธ๋“ค์€ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ์˜ ๊ถค์ ์„ ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์—†๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ค‘๊ฐ„์— ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •์— ์‹คํŒจํ•˜๋Š” ๋“ฑ ๋ถˆ์™„์ „ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ์—์„œ ์˜์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ํฌ์ฆˆ์™€ ํžŒํŠธ๋ฅผ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณด์ƒ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ชจ์…˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์บ๋ฆญํ„ฐ ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•˜๋Š” ์ •์ฑ…์„ ํ•™์Šตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜ ์งธ, ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค์€ ๋น™์ƒ์—์„œ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ณ  ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์›€์ง์ž„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด ๋ชจ์…˜ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์–ป๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กญ๋‹ค. ๋น„๋””์˜ค์—์„œ 3์ฐจ์› ํ‚ค ํฌ์ฆˆ๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ถœํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ถค์  ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๋ฐ ์‹ฌ์ธต๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•™์Šต ์ œ์–ด๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ”ผ๊ฒจ ์Šค์ผ€์ดํŒ… ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œ์—ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ์…‹ ์งธ, ํŒŒํ‚จ์Šจ ๋ณ‘์ด๋‚˜ ๋‡Œ์„ฑ๋งˆ๋น„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์งˆ๋ณ‘์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ์›€์ง์ž„ ์žฅ์• ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๋ณดํ–‰์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. 2์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ ์ž์„ธ ์ถ”์ •๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ธ ๋‹ค์Œ, 3์ฐจ์› ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ์–ป์–ด๋‚ด์–ด ์ด๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋ณดํญ, ๋ณดํ–‰ ์†๋„์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํŒŒ๋ผ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ, ๊ทผ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์ธ์ฒด ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ๊ฐ„ ๋ณดํ–‰์˜ ์ตœ์ ํ™” ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ํƒ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ์œก ํ™œ์„ฑ๋„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”์™€ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๋Œ๋ฆผํž˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”, ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ค€์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜ํ•œ ํ›„, ์‹ค์ œ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ˜์Œ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ž…์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ ์‹œ๋ฎฌ๋ ˆ์ด์…˜์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ฐจ์› ๋น„๋””์˜ค๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•œ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ญ๋™์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์˜ ๋™์ž‘๋“ค์„ ์žฌํ˜„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‚˜์ค‘ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์ฃผ์ œ๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์™€์˜ ๋น„๊ต ๋ถ„์„์„ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค.1 Introduction 1 2 Background 9 2.1 Pose Estimation from 2D Video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2 Motion Reconstruction from Monocular Video . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3 Physics-Based Character Simulation and Control . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.4 Motion Reconstruction Leveraging Physics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.5 Human Motion Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.5.1 Figure Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.6 Objective Gait Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.7 Optimization for Human Movement Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.7.1 Stability Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3 Human Dynamics from Monocular Video with Dynamic Camera Movements 19 3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.2 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.3 Pose and Contact Estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.4 Learning Human Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.4.1 Policy Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.4.2 Network Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.4.3 Scene Estimator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.5 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.1 Video Clips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.5.2 Comparison of Contact Estimators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.5.3 Ablation Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.5.4 Robustness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.6 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 4 Figure Skating Simulation from Video 42 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 4.2 System Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 4.3 Skating Simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.3.1 Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.3.2 Relaxation of Non-holonomic Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.4 Data Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.5 Trajectory Optimization and Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.1 Trajectory Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.5.2 Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.6 Experimental Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.7 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5 Gait Analysis Using Pose Estimation Algorithm with 2D-video of Patients 61 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.1 Patients and video recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.2.2 Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents 66 5.2.3 3D Pose estimation from 2D video . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.2.4 Gait parameter estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 5.2.5 Statistical analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.1 Validation of video-based analysis of the gait . . . . . . . . . 68 5.3.2 gait analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.4.1 Validation with the conventional sensor-based method . . . . 75 5.4.2 Analysis of gait and turning in TUG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.4.3 Correlation with clinical parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.4.4 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.5 Supplementary Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 6 Control Optimization of Human Walking 80 6.1 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 6.2 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.1 Musculoskeletal model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.2 Optimization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 6.2.3 Control co-activation level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6.2.4 Push-recovery experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 7 Conclusion 90 7.1 Future work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91Docto

    Effects of Shuttlecock-Playing on Physical Fitness in College Students

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the exercise intensity and the physical fitness effect of shuttlecock playing. 18 normal body weight college students voluntarily participated in this study. They were randomly assigned to shuttlecock playing (SCP) and control groups. The SCP underwent a 15-week shuttlecock-playing program, but the control group did not receive any special exercise activities. The program was arranged as follows: SCP underwent 4 sessions/week, 3 sets/session, 10 min/set, and rest 5 min between set. The results indicated that systolic pressure, abdominal skinfold, continuing work time, and hip joint flexibility of SCP were significantly improved after 12-week training. It has been concluded that a 15-week shuttlecock-playing program could remarkably promote the physical fitness for college students in body characteristics, body flexibility, and aerobic fitness but not muscular strength in lower limbs
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore