1,080 research outputs found

    Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation Using Neighborhood Knowledge

    Get PDF

    Distinguishing Word Senses in Untagged Text

    Full text link
    This paper describes an experimental comparison of three unsupervised learning algorithms that distinguish the sense of an ambiguous word in untagged text. The methods described in this paper, McQuitty's similarity analysis, Ward's minimum-variance method, and the EM algorithm, assign each instance of an ambiguous word to a known sense definition based solely on the values of automatically identifiable features in text. These methods and feature sets are found to be more successful in disambiguating nouns rather than adjectives or verbs. Overall, the most accurate of these procedures is McQuitty's similarity analysis in combination with a high dimensional feature set.Comment: 11 pages, latex, uses aclap.st

    Named Entity Extraction and Disambiguation: The Reinforcement Effect.

    Get PDF
    Named entity extraction and disambiguation have received much attention in recent years. Typical fields addressing these topics are information retrieval, natural language processing, and semantic web. Although these topics are highly dependent, almost no existing works examine this dependency. It is the aim of this paper to examine the dependency and show how one affects the other, and vice versa. We conducted experiments with a set of descriptions of holiday homes with the aim to extract and disambiguate toponyms as a representative example of named entities. We experimented with three approaches for disambiguation with the purpose to infer the country of the holiday home. We examined how the effectiveness of extraction influences the effectiveness of disambiguation, and reciprocally, how filtering out ambiguous names (an activity that depends on the disambiguation process) improves the effectiveness of extraction. Since this, in turn, may improve the effectiveness of disambiguation again, it shows that extraction and disambiguation may reinforce each other.\u

    Word sense discrimination in information retrieval: a spectral clustering-based approach

    Get PDF
    International audienceWord sense ambiguity has been identified as a cause of poor precision in information retrieval (IR) systems. Word sense disambiguation and discrimination methods have been defined to help systems choose which documents should be retrieved in relation to an ambiguous query. However, the only approaches that show a genuine benefit for word sense discrimination or disambiguation in IR are generally supervised ones. In this paper we propose a new unsupervised method that uses word sense discrimination in IR. The method we develop is based on spectral clustering and reorders an initially retrieved document list by boosting documents that are semantically similar to the target query. For several TREC ad hoc collections we show that our method is useful in the case of queries which contain ambiguous terms. We are interested in improving the level of precision after 5, 10 and 30 retrieved documents (P@5, P@10, P@30) respectively. We show that precision can be improved by 8% above current state-of-the-art baselines. We also focus on poor performing queries

    Unsupervised does not mean uninterpretable : the case for word sense induction and disambiguation

    Get PDF
    This dataset contains the models for interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) that were employed in Panchenko et al. (2017; the paper can be accessed at https://www.lt.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Group_LangTech/publications/EACL_Interpretability___FINAL__1_.pdf). The files were computed on a 2015 dump from the English Wikipedia. Their contents: Induced Sense Inventories: wp_stanford_sense_inventories.tar.gz This file contains 3 inventories (coarse, medium fine) Language Model (3-gram): wiki_text.3.arpa.gz This file contains all n-grams up to n=3 and can be loaded into an index Weighted Dependency Features: wp_stanford_lemma_LMI_s0.0_w2_f2_wf2_wpfmax1000_wpfmin2_p1000.gz This file contains weighted word--context-feature combinations and includes their count and an LMI significance score Distributional Thesaurus (DT) of Dependency Features: wp_stanford_lemma_BIM_LMI_s0.0_w2_f2_wf2_wpfmax1000_wpfmin2_p1000_simsortlimit200_feature expansion.gz This file contains a DT of context features. The context feature similarities can be used for context expansion For further information, consult the paper and the companion page: http://jobimtext.org/wsd/ Panchenko A., Ruppert E., Faralli S., Ponzetto S. P., and Biemann C. (2017): Unsupervised Does Not Mean Uninterpretable: The Case for Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL'2017). Valencia, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics
    • …
    corecore