854 research outputs found
Unsatisfiable Linear CNF Formulas Are Large and Complex
We call a CNF formula linear if any two clauses have at most one variable in
common. We show that there exist unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formulas with at
most 4k^2 4^k clauses, and on the other hand, any linear k-CNF formula with at
most 4^k/(8e^2k^2) clauses is satisfiable. The upper bound uses probabilistic
means, and we have no explicit construction coming even close to it. One reason
for this is that unsatisfiable linear formulas exhibit a more complex structure
than general (non-linear) formulas: First, any treelike resolution refutation
of any unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formula has size at least 2^(2^(k/2-1))$.
This implies that small unsatisfiable linear k-CNF formulas are hard instances
for Davis-Putnam style splitting algorithms. Second, if we require that the
formula F have a strict resolution tree, i.e. every clause of F is used only
once in the resolution tree, then we need at least a^a^...^a clauses, where a
is approximately 2 and the height of this tower is roughly k.Comment: 12 pages plus a two-page appendix; corrected an inconsistency between
title of the paper and title of the arxiv submissio
Understanding Space in Proof Complexity: Separations and Trade-offs via Substitutions
For current state-of-the-art DPLL SAT-solvers the two main bottlenecks are
the amounts of time and memory used. In proof complexity, these resources
correspond to the length and space of resolution proofs. There has been a long
line of research investigating these proof complexity measures, but while
strong results have been established for length, our understanding of space and
how it relates to length has remained quite poor. In particular, the question
whether resolution proofs can be optimized for length and space simultaneously,
or whether there are trade-offs between these two measures, has remained
essentially open.
In this paper, we remedy this situation by proving a host of length-space
trade-off results for resolution. Our collection of trade-offs cover almost the
whole range of values for the space complexity of formulas, and most of the
trade-offs are superpolynomial or even exponential and essentially tight. Using
similar techniques, we show that these trade-offs in fact extend to the
exponentially stronger k-DNF resolution proof systems, which operate with
formulas in disjunctive normal form with terms of bounded arity k. We also
answer the open question whether the k-DNF resolution systems form a strict
hierarchy with respect to space in the affirmative.
Our key technical contribution is the following, somewhat surprising,
theorem: Any CNF formula F can be transformed by simple variable substitution
into a new formula F' such that if F has the right properties, F' can be proven
in essentially the same length as F, whereas on the other hand the minimal
number of lines one needs to keep in memory simultaneously in any proof of F'
is lower-bounded by the minimal number of variables needed simultaneously in
any proof of F. Applying this theorem to so-called pebbling formulas defined in
terms of pebble games on directed acyclic graphs, we obtain our results.Comment: This paper is a merged and updated version of the two ECCC technical
reports TR09-034 and TR09-047, and it hence subsumes these two report
Complexity of Propositional Proofs under a Promise
We study -- within the framework of propositional proof complexity -- the
problem of certifying unsatisfiability of CNF formulas under the promise that
any satisfiable formula has many satisfying assignments, where ``many'' stands
for an explicitly specified function \Lam in the number of variables . To
this end, we develop propositional proof systems under different measures of
promises (that is, different \Lam) as extensions of resolution. This is done
by augmenting resolution with axioms that, roughly, can eliminate sets of truth
assignments defined by Boolean circuits. We then investigate the complexity of
such systems, obtaining an exponential separation in the average-case between
resolution under different size promises:
1. Resolution has polynomial-size refutations for all unsatisfiable 3CNF
formulas when the promise is \eps\cd2^n, for any constant 0<\eps<1.
2. There are no sub-exponential size resolution refutations for random 3CNF
formulas, when the promise is (and the number of clauses is
), for any constant .Comment: 32 pages; a preliminary version appeared in the Proceedings of
ICALP'0
A Generalized Method for Proving Polynomial Calculus Degree Lower Bounds
We study the problem of obtaining lower bounds for polynomial calculus (PC)
and polynomial calculus resolution (PCR) on proof degree, and hence by
[Impagliazzo et al. '99] also on proof size. [Alekhnovich and Razborov '03]
established that if the clause-variable incidence graph of a CNF formula F is a
good enough expander, then proving that F is unsatisfiable requires high PC/PCR
degree. We further develop the techniques in [AR03] to show that if one can
"cluster" clauses and variables in a way that "respects the structure" of the
formula in a certain sense, then it is sufficient that the incidence graph of
this clustered version is an expander. As a corollary of this, we prove that
the functional pigeonhole principle (FPHP) formulas require high PC/PCR degree
when restricted to constant-degree expander graphs. This answers an open
question in [Razborov '02], and also implies that the standard CNF encoding of
the FPHP formulas require exponential proof size in polynomial calculus
resolution. Thus, while Onto-FPHP formulas are easy for polynomial calculus, as
shown in [Riis '93], both FPHP and Onto-PHP formulas are hard even when
restricted to bounded-degree expanders.Comment: Full-length version of paper to appear in Proceedings of the 30th
Annual Computational Complexity Conference (CCC '15), June 201
SAT-Based Synthesis Methods for Safety Specs
Automatic synthesis of hardware components from declarative specifications is
an ambitious endeavor in computer aided design. Existing synthesis algorithms
are often implemented with Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), inheriting their
scalability limitations. Instead of BDDs, we propose several new methods to
synthesize finite-state systems from safety specifications using decision
procedures for the satisfiability of quantified and unquantified Boolean
formulas (SAT-, QBF- and EPR-solvers). The presented approaches are based on
computational learning, templates, or reduction to first-order logic. We also
present an efficient parallelization, and optimizations to utilize reachability
information and incremental solving. Finally, we compare all methods in an
extensive case study. Our new methods outperform BDDs and other existing work
on some classes of benchmarks, and our parallelization achieves a super-linear
speedup. This is an extended version of [5], featuring an additional appendix.Comment: Extended version of a paper at VMCAI'1
Incremental Cardinality Constraints for MaxSAT
Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) is an optimization variant of the Boolean
Satisfiability (SAT) problem. In general, MaxSAT algorithms perform a
succession of SAT solver calls to reach an optimum solution making extensive
use of cardinality constraints. Many of these algorithms are non-incremental in
nature, i.e. at each iteration the formula is rebuilt and no knowledge is
reused from one iteration to another. In this paper, we exploit the knowledge
acquired across iterations using novel schemes to use cardinality constraints
in an incremental fashion. We integrate these schemes with several MaxSAT
algorithms. Our experimental results show a significant performance boost for
these algo- rithms as compared to their non-incremental counterparts. These
results suggest that incremental cardinality constraints could be beneficial
for other constraint solving domains.Comment: 18 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Final version published in Principles
and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP) 201
- …