295 research outputs found
Emergence in artificial life
Even when concepts similar to emergence have been used since antiquity, we
lack an agreed definition. However, emergence has been identified as one of the
main features of complex systems. Most would agree on the statement ``life is
complex''. Thus, understanding emergence and complexity should benefit the
study of living systems.
It can be said that life emerges from the interactions of complex molecules.
But how useful is this to understand living systems? Artificial life (ALife)
has been developed in recent decades to study life using a synthetic approach:
build it to understand it. ALife systems are not so complex, be them soft
(simulations), hard (robots), or wet (protocells). Then, we can aim at first
understanding emergence in ALife, for then using this knowledge in biology.
I argue that to understand emergence and life, it becomes useful to use
information as a framework. In a general sense, I define emergence as
information that is not present at one scale but is present at another scale.
This perspective avoids problems of studying emergence from a materialist
framework, and can be also useful in the study of self-organization and
complexity.Comment: 28 pages, 1 figur
A conceptual proposal on the undecidability of the distribution law of prime numbers and theoretical consequences
Within the conceptual framework of number theory, we consider prime numbers and the classic still unsolved problem to find a complete law of their distribution. We ask ourselves if such persisting difficulties could be understood as due to theoretical incompatibilities. We consider the problem in the conceptual framework of computational theory. This article is a contribution to the philosophy of mathematics proposing different possible understandings of the supposed theoretical unavailability and indemonstrability of the existence of a law of distribution of prime numbers. Tentatively, we conceptually consider demonstrability as computability, in our case the conceptual availability of an algorithm able to compute the general properties of the presumed primesâ distribution law without computing such distribution. The link between the conceptual availability of a distribution law of primes and decidability is given by considering how to decide if a number is prime without computing. The supposed distribution law should allow for any given prime knowing the next prime without factorial computing. Factorial properties of numbers, such as their property of primality, require their factorisation (or equivalent, e.g., the sieves), i.e., effective computing. However, we have factorisation techniques available, but there are no (non-quantum) known algorithms which can effectively factor arbitrary large integers. Then factorisation is undecidable. We consider the theoretical unavailability of a distribution law for factorial properties, as being prime, equivalent to its non-computability, undecidability. The availability and demonstrability of a hypothetical law of distribution of primes is inconsistent with its undecidability. The perspective is to transform this conjecture into a theorem
Emergence and algorithmic information dynamics of systems and observers
Previous work has shown that perturbation analysis in software space can
produce candidate computable generative models and uncover possible causal
properties from the finite description of an object or system quantifying the
algorithmic contribution of each of its elements relative to the whole. One of
the challenges for defining emergence is that one observer's prior knowledge
may cause a phenomenon to present itself to such observer as emergent while for
another as reducible. When attempting to quantify emergence, we demonstrate
that the methods of Algorithmic Information Dynamics can deal with the richness
of such observer-object dependencies both in theory and practice. By
formalising the act of observing as mutual algorithmic perturbation, the
emergence of algorithmic information is rendered invariant, minimal, and robust
in the face of information cost and distortion, while still observer-dependent.
We demonstrate that the unbounded increase of emergent algorithmic information
implies asymptotically observer-independent emergence, which eventually
overcomes any formal theory that an observer might devise to finitely
characterise a phenomenon. We discuss observer-dependent emergence and
asymptotically observer-independent emergence solving some previous suggestions
indicating a hard distinction between strong and weak emergence
Open-Ended Evolution in Cellular Automata Worlds
Open-ended evolution is a fundamental issue in artificial life research. We consider biological and social systems as a flux of interacting components that transiently participate in interactions with other system components as part of these systems. This approach and the corresponding reasoning suggest that systems able to deliver open-ended evolution must have a representation equivalent of Turing machines. Here we provide an implementation of a such model of evolving systems using a cellular automata world. We analyze the simulated world using a set of metrics based on criteria of open-ended evolution suggested by Bedau et al. We show that the cellular automata world has significantly more evolutionary activity than a corresponding random shadow world. Our work indicates that the proposed cellular automata worlds have the potential to generate open-ended evolution according to the criteria that we have considered
In search of the person. Towards a real revolution
The discussion about a difference between brain and soul or mind is now at the center of the anthropological debate. It seems that the pioneers in this current polemic have a reductionistic view of human nature, inherited from the Cartesian solution to mind-body problem and the modern materialistic explanation of reality. This view â dualistic or monistic â about the opposition between material and immaterial structure of the person, claims that as a consequence of scientific progress, the human brain in the future could be completely explained in naturalistic terms. On the other hand, according to the new results of scientific research, this situation reveals the possibility to develop a new, more adequate paradigm of man as an incarnated person. This change was called by many researchers âthe passage from the mind-body problem to the person-body problemâ. It seems that the Aristotelian-Thomistic approach is the most suitable to describe this âparadigm shiftâ. Aristotelian-Thomistic philosophy undoubtedly encourages lively dialogue between philosophy and contemporary sciences through its dual ontology. Thus, it can give suitable answers for questions about the nature of human reason (intentionality); unity of composition of the human brain and the role of causality in natural processes
Agent-Based Modeling: The Right Mathematics for the Social Sciences?
This study provides a basic introduction to agent-based modeling (ABM) as a powerful blend of classical and constructive mathematics, with a primary focus on its applicability for social science research.ďż˝ The typical goals of ABM social science researchers are discussed along with the culture-dish nature of their computer experiments. The applicability of ABM for science more generally is also considered, with special attention to physics. Finally, two distinct types of ABM applications are summarized in order to illustrate concretely the duality of ABM: Real-world systems can not only be simulated with verisimilitude using ABM; they can also be efficiently and robustly designed and constructed on the basis of ABM principles. ďż˝
- âŚ