3 research outputs found

    Unbounded population MO-CMA-ES for the bi-objective BBOB test suite

    No full text
    International audienceThe unbounded population multi-objective covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (UP-MO-CMA-ES) aims at maximizing the total hypervolume covered by all evaluated points. It adds all non-dominated solutions found to its population and employs Gaussian mutations with adaptive covariance matrices to also solve ill-conditioned problems. A novel recombination operator adapts the covariance matrices to point along the Pareto front. The UP-MO-CMA-ES is combined with a parallel exploration strategy and empirically evaluated on the bi-objective BBOB-biobj benchmark problems. Results show that the algorithm can reliably solve ill-conditioned problems as well as weakly-structured problems. However, it is less suited for the rugged multi-modal objective functions in the benchmark

    Multi-Objective Archiving

    Full text link
    Most multi-objective optimisation algorithms maintain an archive explicitly or implicitly during their search. Such an archive can be solely used to store high-quality solutions presented to the decision maker, but in many cases may participate in the search process (e.g., as the population in evolutionary computation). Over the last two decades, archiving, the process of comparing new solutions with previous ones and deciding how to update the archive/population, stands as an important issue in evolutionary multi-objective optimisation (EMO). This is evidenced by constant efforts from the community on developing various effective archiving methods, ranging from conventional Pareto-based methods to more recent indicator-based and decomposition-based ones. However, the focus of these efforts is on empirical performance comparison in terms of specific quality indicators; there is lack of systematic study of archiving methods from a general theoretical perspective. In this paper, we attempt to conduct a systematic overview of multi-objective archiving, in the hope of paving the way to understand archiving algorithms from a holistic perspective of theory and practice, and more importantly providing a guidance on how to design theoretically desirable and practically useful archiving algorithms. In doing so, we also present that archiving algorithms based on weakly Pareto compliant indicators (e.g., epsilon-indicator), as long as designed properly, can achieve the same theoretical desirables as archivers based on Pareto compliant indicators (e.g., hypervolume indicator). Such desirables include the property limit-optimal, the limit form of the possible optimal property that a bounded archiving algorithm can have with respect to the most general form of superiority between solution sets.Comment: 21 pages, 4 figures, journa

    Bio-inspired optimization algorithms for multi-objective problems

    Get PDF
    Orientador : Aurora Trinidad Ramirez PozoCoorientador : Roberto Santana HermidaTese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Exatas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Informática. Defesa: Curitiba, 06/03/2017Inclui referências : f. 161-72Área de concentração : Computer ScienceResumo: Problemas multi-objetivo (MOPs) são caracterizados por terem duas ou mais funções objetivo a serem otimizadas simultaneamente. Nestes problemas, a meta é encontrar um conjunto de soluções não-dominadas geralmente chamado conjunto ótimo de Pareto cuja imagem no espaço de objetivos é chamada frente de Pareto. MOPs que apresentam mais de três funções objetivo a serem otimizadas são conhecidos como problemas com muitos objetivos (MaOPs) e vários estudos indicam que a capacidade de busca de algoritmos baseados em Pareto é severamente deteriorada nesses problemas. O desenvolvimento de otimizadores bio-inspirados para enfrentar MOPs e MaOPs é uma área que vem ganhando atenção na comunidade, no entanto, existem muitas oportunidades para inovar. O algoritmo de enxames de partículas multi-objetivo (MOPSO) é um dos algoritmos bio-inspirados adequados para ser modificado e melhorado, principalmente devido à sua simplicidade, flexibilidade e bons resultados. Para melhorar a capacidade de busca de MOPSOs, seguimos duas linhas de pesquisa diferentes: A primeira foca em métodos de líder e arquivamento. Trabalhos anteriores apontaram que esses componentes podem influenciar no desempenho do algoritmo, porém a seleção desses componentes pode ser dependente do problema. Uma alternativa para selecioná-los dinamicamente é empregando hiper-heurísticas. Ao combinar hiper-heurísticas e MOPSO, desenvolvemos um novo framework chamado H-MOPSO. A segunda linha de pesquisa também é baseada em trabalhos anteriores do grupo que focam em múltiplos enxames. Isso é feito selecionando como base o framework multi-enxame iterado (I-Multi), cujo procedimento de busca pode ser dividido em busca de diversidade e busca com múltiplos enxames, e a última usa agrupamento para dividir um enxame em vários sub-enxames. Para melhorar o desempenho do I-Multi, exploramos duas possibilidades: a primeira foi investigar o efeito de diferentes características do mecanismo de agrupamento do I-Multi. A segunda foi investigar alternativas para melhorar a convergência de cada sub-enxame, como hibridizá-lo com um algoritmo de estimativa de distribuição (EDA). Este trabalho com EDA aumentou nosso interesse nesta abordagem, portanto seguimos outra linha de pesquisa, investigando alternativas para criar versões multi-objetivo de um dos EDAs mais poderosos da literatura, chamado estratégia de evolução baseada na adaptação da matriz de covariância (CMA-ES). Para validar o nosso trabalho, vários estudos empíricos foram conduzidos para investigar a capacidade de busca das abordagens propostas. Em todos os estudos, nossos algoritmos investigados alcançaram resultados competitivos ou melhores do que algoritmos bem estabelecidos da literatura. Palavras-chave: multi-objetivo, algoritmo de estimativa de distribuição, otimização por enxame de partículas, multiplos enxames, híper-heuristicas.Abstract: Multi-Objective Problems (MOPs) are characterized by having two or more objective functions to be simultaneously optimized. In these problems, the goal is to find a set of non-dominated solutions usually called Pareto optimal set whose image in the objective space is called Pareto front. MOPs presenting more than three objective functions to be optimized are known as Many-Objective Problems (MaOPs) and several studies indicate that the search ability of Pareto-based algorithms is severely deteriorated in such problems. The development of bio-inspired optimizers to tackle MOPs and MaOPs is a field that has been gaining attention in the community, however there are many opportunities to innovate. Multi-objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) is one of the bio-inspired algorithms suitable to be modified and improved, mostly due to its simplicity, flexibility and good results. To enhance the search ability of MOPSOs, we followed two different research lines: The first focus on leader and archiving methods. Previous works have pointed that these components can influence the algorithm performance, however the selection of these components can be problem-dependent. An alternative to dynamically select them is by employing hyper-heuristics. By combining hyper-heuristics and MOPSO, we developed a new framework called H-MOPSO. The second research line, is also based on previous works of the group that focus on multi-swarm. This is done by selecting as base framework the iterated multi swarm (I-Multi) algorithm, whose search procedure can be divided into diversity and multi-swarm searches, and the latter employs clustering to split a swarm into several sub-swarms. In order to improve the performance of I-Multi, we explored two possibilities: the first was to further investigate the effect of different characteristics of the clustering mechanism of I-Multi. The second was to investigate alternatives to improve the convergence of each sub-swarm, like hybridizing it to an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm (EDA). This work on EDA increased our interest in this approach, hence we followed another research line by investigating alternatives to create multi-objective versions of one of the most powerful EDAs from the literature, the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES). In order to validate our work, several empirical studies were conducted to investigate the search ability of the approaches proposed. In all studies, our investigated algorithms have reached competitive or better results than well established algorithms from the literature. Keywords: multi-objective, estimation of distribution algorithms, particle swarm optimization, multi-swarm, hyper-heuristics
    corecore