13 research outputs found
Weighted tree-walking automata
We define weighted tree-walking automata. We show that the class of tree series recognizable by weighted tree-walking automata over a commutative semiring K is a subclass of the class of regular tree series over K. If K is not a ring, then the inclusion is strict
Pebble alternating tree-walking automata and their recognizing power
Pebble tree-walking automata with alternation were first investigated by Milo, Suciu and Vianu (2003), who showed that tree languages recognized by these devices are exactly the regular tree languages. We strengthen this by proving the same result for pebble automata with "strong pebble handling" which means that pebbles can be lifted independently of the position of the reading head and without moving the reading head. Then we make a comparison among some restricted versions of these automata. We will show that the deterministic and non-looping pebble alternating tree-walking automata are strictly less powerful than their nondeterministic counterparts, i.e., they do not recognize all the regular tree languages. Moreover, there is a proper hierarchy of recognizing capacity of deterministic and non-looping n-pebble alternating tree-walking automata with respect to the number of pebbles, i.e., for each n ≥ 0, deterministic and non-looping (n+1)-pebble alternating tree-walking automata are more powerful than their n-pebble counterparts
Automata with Nested Pebbles Capture First-Order Logic with Transitive Closure
String languages recognizable in (deterministic) log-space are characterized
either by two-way (deterministic) multi-head automata, or following Immerman,
by first-order logic with (deterministic) transitive closure. Here we elaborate
this result, and match the number of heads to the arity of the transitive
closure. More precisely, first-order logic with k-ary deterministic transitive
closure has the same power as deterministic automata walking on their input
with k heads, additionally using a finite set of nested pebbles. This result is
valid for strings, ordered trees, and in general for families of graphs having
a fixed automaton that can be used to traverse the nodes of each of the graphs
in the family. Other examples of such families are grids, toruses, and
rectangular mazes. For nondeterministic automata, the logic is restricted to
positive occurrences of transitive closure.
The special case of k=1 for trees, shows that single-head deterministic
tree-walking automata with nested pebbles are characterized by first-order
logic with unary deterministic transitive closure. This refines our earlier
result that placed these automata between first-order and monadic second-order
logic on trees.Comment: Paper for Logical Methods in Computer Science, 27 pages, 1 figur
Deciding determinism of caterpillar expressions
AbstractCaterpillar expressions have been introduced by BrĂĽggemann-Klein and Wood for applications in markup languages. Caterpillar expressions provide a convenient formalism for specifying the operation of tree-walking automata on unranked trees. Here we give a formal definition of determinism of caterpillar expressions that is based on the language of instruction sequences defined by the expression. We show that determinism of caterpillar expressions can be decided in polynomial time
Tree-Walking Automata Do Not Recognize All Regular Languages
International audienceTree-walking automata are a natural sequential model for recognizing tree languages. It is well known that every tree language recognized by a tree-walking automaton is regular. We show that the converse does not hold
Tree-walking automata do not recognize all regular languages
Tree-walking automata are a natural sequential model for recognizing tree languages. Every tree language recognized by a tree-walking automaton is regular. In this paper, we present a tree language which is regular but not recognized by any (nondeterministic) tree-walking automaton. This settles a conjecture of Engelfriet, Hoogeboom and Van Best. Moreover, the separating tree language is definable already in first-order logic over a signature containing the left-son, right-son and ancestor relations
Linear Bounded Composition of Tree-Walking Tree Transducers: Linear Size Increase and Complexity
Compositions of tree-walking tree transducers form a hierarchy with respect
to the number of transducers in the composition. As main technical result it is
proved that any such composition can be realized as a linear bounded
composition, which means that the sizes of the intermediate results can be
chosen to be at most linear in the size of the output tree. This has
consequences for the expressiveness and complexity of the translations in the
hierarchy. First, if the computed translation is a function of linear size
increase, i.e., the size of the output tree is at most linear in the size of
the input tree, then it can be realized by just one, deterministic,
tree-walking tree transducer. For compositions of deterministic transducers it
is decidable whether or not the translation is of linear size increase. Second,
every composition of deterministic transducers can be computed in deterministic
linear time on a RAM and in deterministic linear space on a Turing machine,
measured in the sum of the sizes of the input and output tree. Similarly, every
composition of nondeterministic transducers can be computed in simultaneous
polynomial time and linear space on a nondeterministic Turing machine. Their
output tree languages are deterministic context-sensitive, i.e., can be
recognized in deterministic linear space on a Turing machine. The membership
problem for compositions of nondeterministic translations is nondeterministic
polynomial time and deterministic linear space. The membership problem for the
composition of a nondeterministic and a deterministic tree-walking tree
translation (for a nondeterministic IO macro tree translation) is log-space
reducible to a context-free language, whereas the membership problem for the
composition of a deterministic and a nondeterministic tree-walking tree
translation (for a nondeterministic OI macro tree translation) is possibly
NP-complete