Representation Learning for Words and Entities

This thesis presents new methods for unsupervised learning of distributed representations of words and entities from text and knowledge bases. The first algorithm presented in the thesis is a multi-view algorithm for learning representations of words called Multiview Latent Semantic Analysis (MVLSA). By incorporating up to 46 different types of co-occurrence statistics for the same vocabulary of english words, I show that MVLSA outperforms other state-of-the-art word embedding models. Next, I focus on learning entity representations for search and recommendation and present the second method of this thesis, Neural Variational Set Expansion (NVSE). NVSE is also an unsupervised learning method, but it is based on the Variational Autoencoder framework. Evaluations with human annotators show that NVSE can facilitate better search and recommendation of information gathered from noisy, automatic annotation of unstructured natural language corpora. Finally, I move from unstructured data and focus on structured knowledge graphs. I present novel approaches for learning embeddings of vertices and edges in a knowledge graph that obey logical constraints.Comment: phd thesis, Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Representation Learning, Knowledge Graphs, Entities, Word Embeddings, Entity Embedding

Representation Learning for Words and Entities

This thesis presents new methods for unsupervised learning of distributed representations of words and entities from text and knowledge bases. The first algorithm presented in the thesis is a multi-view algorithm for learning representations of words called Multiview LSA (MVLSA). Through experiments on close to 50 different views, I show that MVLSA outperforms other state-of-the-art word embedding models. After that, I focus on learning entity representations for search and recommendation and present the second algorithm of this thesis called Neural Variational Set Expansion (NVSE). NVSE is also an unsupervised learning method, but it is based on the Variational Autoencoder framework. Evaluations with human annotators show that NVSE can facilitate better search and recommendation of information gathered from noisy, automatic annotation of unstructured natural language corpora. Finally, I move from unstructured data and focus on structured knowledge graphs. Moreover, I present novel approaches for learning embeddings of vertices and edges in a knowledge graph that obey logical constraints

REVISITING RECOGNIZING TEXTUAL ENTAILMENT FOR EVALUATING NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS

Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) began as a unified framework to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of Natural Language Processing (NLP) models. In recent years, RTE has evolved in the NLP community into a task that researchers focus on developing models for. This thesis revisits the tradition of RTE as an evaluation framework for NLP models, especially in the era of deep learning. Chapter 2 provides an overview of different approaches to evaluating NLP sys- tems, discusses prior RTE datasets, and argues why many of them do not serve as satisfactory tests to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of NLP systems. Chapter 3 presents a new large-scale diverse collection of RTE datasets (DNC) that tests how well NLP systems capture a range of semantic phenomena that are integral to un- derstanding human language. Chapter 4 demonstrates how the DNC can be used to evaluate reasoning capabilities of NLP models. Chapter 5 discusses the limits of RTE as an evaluation framework by illuminating how existing datasets contain biases that may enable crude modeling approaches to perform surprisingly well. The remaining aspects of the thesis focus on issues raised in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 addresses issues in prior RTE datasets focused on paraphrasing and presents a high-quality test set that can be used to analyze how robust RTE systems are to paraphrases. Chapter 7 demonstrates how modeling approaches on biases, e.g. adversarial learning, can enable RTE models overcome biases discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 8 applies these methods to the task of discovering emergency needs during disaster events