535 research outputs found
High-Performance Cloud Computing: A View of Scientific Applications
Scientific computing often requires the availability of a massive number of
computers for performing large scale experiments. Traditionally, these needs
have been addressed by using high-performance computing solutions and installed
facilities such as clusters and super computers, which are difficult to setup,
maintain, and operate. Cloud computing provides scientists with a completely
new model of utilizing the computing infrastructure. Compute resources, storage
resources, as well as applications, can be dynamically provisioned (and
integrated within the existing infrastructure) on a pay per use basis. These
resources can be released when they are no more needed. Such services are often
offered within the context of a Service Level Agreement (SLA), which ensure the
desired Quality of Service (QoS). Aneka, an enterprise Cloud computing
solution, harnesses the power of compute resources by relying on private and
public Clouds and delivers to users the desired QoS. Its flexible and service
based infrastructure supports multiple programming paradigms that make Aneka
address a variety of different scenarios: from finance applications to
computational science. As examples of scientific computing in the Cloud, we
present a preliminary case study on using Aneka for the classification of gene
expression data and the execution of fMRI brain imaging workflow.Comment: 13 pages, 9 figures, conference pape
Towards an MPI-like Framework for Azure Cloud Platform
Message passing interface (MPI) has been widely used for implementing parallel and distributed applications. The emergence of cloud computing offers a scalable, fault-tolerant, on-demand al-ternative to traditional on-premise clusters. In this thesis, we investigate the possibility of adopt-ing the cloud platform as an alternative to conventional MPI-based solutions. We show that cloud platform can exhibit competitive performance and benefit the users of this platform with its fault-tolerant architecture and on-demand access for a robust solution. Extensive research is done to identify the difficulties of designing and implementing an MPI-like framework for Azure cloud platform. We present the details of the key components required for implementing such a framework along with our experimental results for benchmarking multiple basic operations of MPI standard implemented in the cloud and its practical application in solving well-known large-scale algorithmic problems
Scientific High Performance Computing (HPC) Applications On The Azure Cloud Platform
Cloud computing is emerging as a promising platform for compute and data intensive scientific applications. Thanks to the on-demand elastic provisioning capabilities, cloud computing has instigated curiosity among researchers from a wide range of disciplines. However, even though many vendors have rolled out their commercial cloud infrastructures, the service offerings are usually only best-effort based without any performance guarantees. Utilization of these resources will be questionable if it can not meet the performance expectations of deployed applications. Additionally, the lack of the familiar development tools hamper the productivity of eScience developers to write robust scientific high performance computing (HPC) applications. There are no standard frameworks that are currently supported by any large set of vendors offering cloud computing services. Consequently, the application portability among different cloud platforms for scientific applications is hard. Among all clouds, the emerging Azure cloud from Microsoft in particular remains a challenge for HPC program development both due to lack of its support for traditional parallel programming support such as Message Passing Interface (MPI) and map-reduce and due to its evolving application programming interfaces (APIs). We have designed newer frameworks and runtime environments to help HPC application developers by providing them with easy to use tools similar to those known from traditional parallel and distributed computing environment set- ting, such as MPI, for scientific application development on the Azure cloud platform. It is challenging to create an efficient framework for any cloud platform, including the Windows Azure platform, as they are mostly offered to users as a black-box with a set of application programming interfaces (APIs) to access various service components. The primary contributions of this Ph.D. thesis are (i) creating a generic framework for bag-of-tasks HPC applications to serve as the basic building block for application development on the Azure cloud platform, (ii) creating a set of APIs for HPC application development over the Azure cloud platform, which is similar to message passing interface (MPI) from traditional parallel and distributed setting, and (iii) implementing Crayons using the proposed APIs as the first end-to-end parallel scientific application to parallelize the fundamental GIS operations
On Evaluating Commercial Cloud Services: A Systematic Review
Background: Cloud Computing is increasingly booming in industry with many
competing providers and services. Accordingly, evaluation of commercial Cloud
services is necessary. However, the existing evaluation studies are relatively
chaotic. There exists tremendous confusion and gap between practices and theory
about Cloud services evaluation. Aim: To facilitate relieving the
aforementioned chaos, this work aims to synthesize the existing evaluation
implementations to outline the state-of-the-practice and also identify research
opportunities in Cloud services evaluation. Method: Based on a conceptual
evaluation model comprising six steps, the Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
method was employed to collect relevant evidence to investigate the Cloud
services evaluation step by step. Results: This SLR identified 82 relevant
evaluation studies. The overall data collected from these studies essentially
represent the current practical landscape of implementing Cloud services
evaluation, and in turn can be reused to facilitate future evaluation work.
Conclusions: Evaluation of commercial Cloud services has become a world-wide
research topic. Some of the findings of this SLR identify several research gaps
in the area of Cloud services evaluation (e.g., the Elasticity and Security
evaluation of commercial Cloud services could be a long-term challenge), while
some other findings suggest the trend of applying commercial Cloud services
(e.g., compared with PaaS, IaaS seems more suitable for customers and is
particularly important in industry). This SLR study itself also confirms some
previous experiences and reveals new Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE)
lessons
On a Catalogue of Metrics for Evaluating Commercial Cloud Services
Given the continually increasing amount of commercial Cloud services in the
market, evaluation of different services plays a significant role in
cost-benefit analysis or decision making for choosing Cloud Computing. In
particular, employing suitable metrics is essential in evaluation
implementations. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is not any
systematic discussion about metrics for evaluating Cloud services. By using the
method of Systematic Literature Review (SLR), we have collected the de facto
metrics adopted in the existing Cloud services evaluation work. The collected
metrics were arranged following different Cloud service features to be
evaluated, which essentially constructed an evaluation metrics catalogue, as
shown in this paper. This metrics catalogue can be used to facilitate the
future practice and research in the area of Cloud services evaluation.
Moreover, considering metrics selection is a prerequisite of benchmark
selection in evaluation implementations, this work also supplements the
existing research in benchmarking the commercial Cloud services.Comment: 10 pages, Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference
on Grid Computing (Grid 2012), pp. 164-173, Beijing, China, September 20-23,
201
ΠΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΡΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
Computer clouds are using in health science for its data collections, manipulations and providing security needs in communications to exchange. The clouds distribution data character is using in science applications created to evaluate the data of the health-care. The science programs like medical visualization, genetic and protein conclusions, map-drag therapy and clinical decisions systems of support (CDSS) require high performance messaging libraries with minimum computer and communication spends and the effective utilization of the resources. The highperformance Java sockets (HPJS) encapsulate the needs of message high communications between cloud platforms science applications. HPJS effectively uses the Java socket realization for high-performance inner-process communications. With single-copy protocol, re-usability of the thread and communication overhead reduction, HPJS can use the message exchange in two times quickly to conventional buffered communication libraries.ΠΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°. Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΡ ΡΠΊ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ, Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ (CDSS) ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΡ Π±ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Ρ Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°Π·Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΡ (HPJS) ΠΈΠ½ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ cloud-ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΡΠ° ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. Π‘ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠ° ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π² Π΄Π²Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π° Π±ΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ²ΡΠ·ΠΈ.ΠΠΎΠΌΠΏβΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ Π½Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²βΡ Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π±Π΅ΡΡΠ³Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΡΠ±, ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π·Π°Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π± Π±Π΅Π·ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΡΠ½Ρ. Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ±Π½ΠΈΡ
Π½Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°Π΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
, ΡΠΊΡ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²βΡ. Π’Π°ΠΊΡ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΊ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠ½Π° Π²ΡΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ, Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ, Π»ΡΠΊΡΠ²Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΡΡ ΡΠ° ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ (CDSS) Π²ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π³Π°ΡΡΡ Π±ΡΠ±Π»ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΡΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π· ΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏβΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΠ½ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ° Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΡΠ². ΠΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈ (HPJS) ΡΠ½ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΡΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΈ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΡΠ½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΡΠΆ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ cloud-ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌ ΡΠ° Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡΡΡ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²βΡΠ·ΠΊΡ ΠΌΡΠΆ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ. Π ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊ ΡΠ° Π·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΡΡΠ°Ρ Π·Π²βΡΠ·ΠΊΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ Java-ΡΠΎΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΡΠ½ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π² Π΄Π²Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ· Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠ±Π»ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π·Π²βΡΠ·ΠΊΡ
- β¦