Strong Refutation Heuristics for Random k-SAT

This publication is with permission of the rights owner freely accessible due to an Alliance licence and a national licence (funded by the DFG, German Research Foundation) respectively.A simple first moment argument shows that in a randomly chosen $k$-SAT formula with $m$ clauses over $n$ boolean variables, the fraction of satisfiable clauses is $1-2^{-k}+o(1)$ as $m/n\rightarrow\infty$ almost surely. In this paper, we deal with the corresponding algorithmic strong refutation problem: given a random $k$-SAT formula, can we find a certificate that the fraction of satisfiable clauses is $1-2^{-k}+o(1)$ in polynomial time? We present heuristics based on spectral techniques that in the case $k=3$ and $m\geq\ln(n)^6n^{3/2}$, and in the case $k=4$ and $m\geq Cn^2$, find such certificates almost surely. In addition, we present heuristics for bounding the independence number (resp. the chromatic number) of random $k$-uniform hypergraphs from above (resp. from below) for $k=3,4$.Peer Reviewe

Going after the k-SAT Threshold

Random $k$-SAT is the single most intensely studied example of a random constraint satisfaction problem. But despite substantial progress over the past decade, the threshold for the existence of satisfying assignments is not known precisely for any $k\geq3$. The best current results, based on the second moment method, yield upper and lower bounds that differ by an additive $k\cdot \frac{\ln2}2$, a term that is unbounded in $k$ (Achlioptas, Peres: STOC 2003). The basic reason for this gap is the inherent asymmetry of the Boolean value `true' and `false' in contrast to the perfect symmetry, e.g., among the various colors in a graph coloring problem. Here we develop a new asymmetric second moment method that allows us to tackle this issue head on for the first time in the theory of random CSPs. This technique enables us to compute the $k$-SAT threshold up to an additive $\ln2-\frac12+O(1/k)\approx 0.19$. Independently of the rigorous work, physicists have developed a sophisticated but non-rigorous technique called the "cavity method" for the study of random CSPs (M\'ezard, Parisi, Zecchina: Science 2002). Our result matches the best bound that can be obtained from the so-called "replica symmetric" version of the cavity method, and indeed our proof directly harnesses parts of the physics calculations

The asymptotics of the clustering transition for random constraint satisfaction problems

Random Constraint Satisfaction Problems exhibit several phase transitions when their density of constraints is varied. One of these threshold phenomena, known as the clustering or dynamic transition, corresponds to a transition for an information theoretic problem called tree reconstruction. In this article we study this threshold for two CSPs, namely the bicoloring of $k$-uniform hypergraphs with a density $\alpha$ of constraints, and the $q$-coloring of random graphs with average degree $c$. We show that in the large $k,q$ limit the clustering transition occurs for $\alpha = \frac{2^{k-1}}{k} (\ln k + \ln \ln k + \gamma_{\rm d} + o(1))$, $c= q (\ln q + \ln \ln q + \gamma_{\rm d}+ o(1))$, where $\gamma_{\rm d}$ is the same constant for both models. We characterize $\gamma_{\rm d}$ via a functional equation, solve the latter numerically to estimate $\gamma_{\rm d} \approx 0.871$, and obtain an analytic lowerbound $\gamma_{\rm d} \ge 1 + \ln (2 (\sqrt{2}-1)) \approx 0.812$. Our analysis unveils a subtle interplay of the clustering transition with the rigidity (naive reconstruction) threshold that occurs on the same asymptotic scale at $\gamma_{\rm r}=1$.Comment: 35 pages, 8 figure

Reconstruction of Random Colourings

Reconstruction problems have been studied in a number of contexts including biology, information theory and and statistical physics. We consider the reconstruction problem for random $k$-colourings on the $\Delta$-ary tree for large $k$. Bhatnagar et. al. showed non-reconstruction when $\Delta \leq \frac12 k\log k - o(k\log k)$ and reconstruction when $\Delta \geq k\log k + o(k\log k)$. We tighten this result and show non-reconstruction when $\Delta \leq k[\log k + \log \log k + 1 - \ln 2 -o(1)]$ and reconstruction when $\Delta \geq k[\log k + \log \log k + 1+o(1)]$.Comment: Added references, updated notatio