44 research outputs found

    Laplacian spectral characterization of roses

    Full text link
    A rose graph is a graph consisting of cycles that all meet in one vertex. We show that except for two specific examples, these rose graphs are determined by the Laplacian spectrum, thus proving a conjecture posed by Lui and Huang [F.J. Liu and Q.X. Huang, Laplacian spectral characterization of 3-rose graphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 439 (2013), 2914--2920]. We also show that if two rose graphs have a so-called universal Laplacian matrix with the same spectrum, then they must be isomorphic. In memory of Horst Sachs (1927-2016), we show the specific case of the latter result for the adjacency matrix by using Sachs' theorem and a new result on the number of matchings in the disjoint union of paths

    Copies of a rooted weighted graph attached to an arbitrary weighted graph and applications

    Get PDF
    The spectrum of the Laplacian, signless Laplacian and adjacency matrices of the family of the weighted graphs R{H}, obtained from a connected weighted graph R on r vertices and r copies of a modified Bethe tree H by identifying the root of the i-th copy of H with the i-th vertex of R, is determined

    Spectra of weighted rooted graphs having prescribed subgraphs at some levels

    Get PDF
    Let B be a weighted generalized Bethe tree of k levels (k > 1) in which nj is the number of vertices at the level k-j+1 (1 ≤ j ≤ k). Let Δ \subset {1, 2,., k-1} and F={Gj:j \in Δ}, where Gj is a prescribed weighted graph on each set of children of B at the level k-j+1. In this paper, the eigenvalues of a block symmetric tridiagonal matrix of order n1+n2 +...+nk are characterized as the eigenvalues of symmetric tridiagonal matrices of order j, 1≤j≤k, easily constructed from the degrees of the vertices, the weights of the edges, and the eigenvalues of the matrices associated to the family of graphs F. These results are applied to characterize the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix, including their multiplicities, of the graph β(F) obtained from β and all the graphs in F={Gj:j \in Δ}; and also of the signless Laplacian and adjacency matrices whenever the graphs of the family F are regular.CIDMAFCTFEDER/POCI 2010PTDC/MAT/112276/2009Fondecyt - IC Project 11090211Fondecyt Regular 110007

    New constructions of non-regular cospectral graphs

    Full text link
    We consider two types of joins of graphs G1G_{1} and G2G_{2}, G1G2G_{1}\veebar G_{2} - the Neighbors Splitting Join and G1=G2G_{1}\underset{=}{\lor}G_{2} - the Non Neighbors Splitting Join, and compute the adjacency characteristic polynomial, the Laplacian characteristic polynomial and the signless Laplacian characteristic polynomial of these joins. When G1G_{1} and G2G_{2} are regular, we compute the adjacency spectrum, the Laplacian spectrum, the signless Laplacian spectrum of G1=G2G_{1}\underset{=}{\lor}G_{2} and the normalized Laplacian spectrum of G1G2G_{1}\veebar G_{2} and G1=G2G_{1}\underset{=}{\lor}G_{2}. We use these results to construct non regular, non isomorphic graphs that are cospectral with respect to the four matrices: adjacency, Laplacian , signless Laplacian and normalized Laplacian

    Spectral faux trees

    Full text link
    A spectral faux tree with respect to a given matrix is a graph which is not a tree but is cospectral with a tree for the given matrix. We consider the existence of spectral faux trees for several matrices, with emphasis on constructions. For the Laplacian matrix, there are no spectral faux trees. For the adjacency matrix, almost all trees are cospectral with a faux tree. For the signless Laplacian matrix, spectral faux trees can only exist when the number of vertices is of the form n=4kn=4k. For the normalized adjacency, spectral faux trees exist when the number of vertices n4n\ge 4, and we give an explicit construction for a family whose size grows exponentially with kk for n=αk+1n=\alpha k+1 where α\alpha is fixed.Comment: 17 page

    Spectra of generalized corona of graphs constrained by vertex subsets

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we introduce a generalization of corona of graphs. This construction generalizes the generalized corona of graphs (consequently, the corona of graphs), the cluster of graphs, the corona-vertex subdivision graph of graphs and the corona-edge subdivision graph of graphs. Further, it enables to get some more variants of corona of graphs as its particular cases. To determine the spectra of the adjacency, Laplacian and the signless Laplacian matrices of the above mentioned graphs, we define a notion namely, the coronal of a matrix constrained by an index set, which generalizes the coronal of a graph matrix. Then we prove several results pertain to the determination of this value. Then we determine the characteristic polynomials of the adjacency and the Laplacian matrices of this graph in terms of the characteristic polynomials of the adjacency and the Laplacian matrices of the constituent graphs and the coronal of some matrices related to the constituent graphs. Using these, we derive the characteristic polynomials of the adjacency and the Laplacian matrices of the above mentioned existing variants of corona of graphs, and some more variants of corona of graphs with some special constraints.Comment: 22 pages, 1 figur

    On the determinant of the QQ-walk matrix of rooted product with a path

    Full text link
    Let GG be an nn-vertex graph and Q(G)Q(G) be its signless Laplacian matrix. The QQ-walk matrix of GG, denoted by WQ(G)W_Q(G), is [e,Q(G)e,,Qn1(G)e][e,Q(G)e,\ldots,Q^{n-1}(G)e], where ee is the all-one vector. Let GPmG\circ P_m be the graph obtained from GG and nn copies of the path PmP_m by identifying the ii-th vertex of GG with an endvertex of the ii-th copy of PmP_m for each ii. We prove that, detWQ(GPm)=±(detQ(G))m1(detWQ(G))m\det W_Q(G\circ P_m)=\pm (\det Q(G))^{m-1}(\det W_Q(G))^m holds for any m2m\ge 2. This gives a signless Laplacian counterpart of the following recently established identity [17]: detWA(GPm)=±(detA(G))m2(detWA(G))m,\det W_A(G\circ P_m)=\pm (\det A(G))^{\lfloor\frac{m}{2}\rfloor}(\det W_A(G))^m, where A(G)A(G) is the adjacency matrix of GG and WA(G)=[e,A(G)e,,An1(G)e]W_A(G)=[e,A(G)e,\ldots,A^{n-1}(G)e]. We also propose a conjecture to unify the above two equalities.Comment: 16 pages, 1 figur
    corecore