8 research outputs found
The maximum number of faces of the Minkowski sum of two convex polytopes
We derive tight expressions for the maximum number of -faces,
, of the Minkowski sum, , of two
-dimensional convex polytopes and , as a function of the number
of vertices of the polytopes.
For even dimensions , the maximum values are attained when and
are cyclic -polytopes with disjoint vertex sets. For odd dimensions
, the maximum values are attained when and are
-neighborly -polytopes, whose vertex sets are
chosen appropriately from two distinct -dimensional moment-like curves.Comment: 37 pages, 8 figures, conference version to appear at SODA 2012; v2:
fixed typos, made stylistic changes, added figure
Log-concavity and lower bounds for arithmetic circuits
One question that we investigate in this paper is, how can we build
log-concave polynomials using sparse polynomials as building blocks? More
precisely, let be a
polynomial satisfying the log-concavity condition a\_i^2 \textgreater{} \tau
a\_{i-1}a\_{i+1} for every where \tau
\textgreater{} 0. Whenever can be written under the form where the polynomials have at most
monomials, it is clear that . Assuming that the
have only non-negative coefficients, we improve this degree bound to if \tau \textgreater{} 1,
and to if .
This investigation has a complexity-theoretic motivation: we show that a
suitable strengthening of the above results would imply a separation of the
algebraic complexity classes VP and VNP. As they currently stand, these results
are strong enough to provide a new example of a family of polynomials in VNP
which cannot be computed by monotone arithmetic circuits of polynomial size
The maximum number of faces of the Minkowski sum of three convex polytopes
We derive tight expressions for the maximum
number of -faces, , of the
Minkowski sum, , of three -dimensional convex polytopes , and in ,
as a function of the number of vertices of the polytopes, for any .
Expressing the Minkowski sum as a section of the Cayley polytope of its summands, counting the -faces of reduces to counting the -faces of which meet the vertex sets of the three polytopes.
In two dimensions our expressions reduce to known results,
while in three dimensions, the tightness of our bounds follows by exploiting known tight bounds for the number of faces of -polytopes in , where .
For , the maximum values are attained when
, and are -polytopes, whose vertex sets are chosen appropriately from three distinct -dimensional moment-like curves
Almost simplicial polytopes: the lower and upper bound theorems
International audiencethis is an extended abstract of the full version. We study n-vertex d-dimensional polytopes with at most one nonsimplex facet with, say, d + s vertices, called almost simplicial polytopes. We provide tight lower and upper bounds for the face numbers of these polytopes as functions of d, n and s, thus generalizing the classical Lower Bound Theorem by Barnette and Upper Bound Theorem by McMullen, which treat the case s = 0. We characterize the minimizers and provide examples of maximizers, for any d
A geometric approach for the upper bound theorem for Minkowski sums of convex polytopes
We derive tight expressions for the maximum number of -faces,
, of the Minkowski sum, , of convex
-polytopes in , where and , as a
(recursively defined) function on the number of vertices of the polytopes.
Our results coincide with those recently proved by Adiprasito and Sanyal [2].
In contrast to Adiprasito and Sanyal's approach, which uses tools from
Combinatorial Commutative Algebra, our approach is purely geometric and uses
basic notions such as - and -vector calculus and shellings, and
generalizes the methodology used in [15] and [14] for proving upper bounds on
the -vector of the Minkowski sum of two and three convex polytopes,
respectively.
The key idea behind our approach is to express the Minkowski sum
as a section of the Cayley polytope of the
summands; bounding the -faces of reduces to bounding the
subset of the -faces of that contain vertices from each
of the polytopes.
We end our paper with a sketch of an explicit construction that establishes
the tightness of the upper bounds.Comment: 43 pages; minor changes (mostly typos