30 research outputs found

    On equivalence, languages equivalence and minimization of multi-letter and multi-letter measure-many quantum automata

    Full text link
    We first show that given a k1k_1-letter quantum finite automata A1\mathcal{A}_1 and a k2k_2-letter quantum finite automata A2\mathcal{A}_2 over the same input alphabet Σ\Sigma, they are equivalent if and only if they are (n12+n221)Σk1+k(n_1^2+n_2^2-1)|\Sigma|^{k-1}+k-equivalent where n1n_1, i=1,2i=1,2, are the numbers of state in Ai\mathcal{A}_i respectively, and k=max{k1,k2}k=\max\{k_1,k_2\}. By applying a method, due to the author, used to deal with the equivalence problem of {\it measure many one-way quantum finite automata}, we also show that a k1k_1-letter measure many quantum finite automaton A1\mathcal{A}_1 and a k2k_2-letter measure many quantum finite automaton A2\mathcal{A}_2 are equivalent if and only if they are (n12+n221)Σk1+k(n_1^2+n_2^2-1)|\Sigma|^{k-1}+k-equivalent where nin_i, i=1,2i=1,2, are the numbers of state in Ai\mathcal{A}_i respectively, and k=max{k1,k2}k=\max\{k_1,k_2\}. Next, we study the language equivalence problem of those two kinds of quantum finite automata. We show that for kk-letter quantum finite automata, the non-strict cut-point language equivalence problem is undecidable, i.e., it is undecidable whether Lλ(A1)=Lλ(A2)L_{\geq\lambda}(\mathcal{A}_1)=L_{\geq\lambda}(\mathcal{A}_2) where 0<λ10<\lambda\leq 1 and Ai\mathcal{A}_i are kik_i-letter quantum finite automata. Further, we show that both strict and non-strict cut-point language equivalence problem for kk-letter measure many quantum finite automata are undecidable. The direct consequences of the above outcomes are summarized in the paper. Finally, we comment on existing proofs about the minimization problem of one way quantum finite automata not only because we have been showing great interest in this kind of problem, which is very important in classical automata theory, but also due to that the problem itself, personally, is a challenge. This problem actually remains open.Comment: 30 pages, conclusion section correcte

    Минимизация информационных структур с почти коммутативными свойствами

    Get PDF
    Решение фундаментальных проблем информационных структур с почти коммутативными свойствами, минимизации эквивалентных преобразований и эквивалентности для подклассов информационных структу

    Scheduling Transformation and Dependence Tests for Recursive Programs

    Get PDF
    Scheduling transformations reorder the execution of operations in a program to improve locality and/or parallelism. The polyhedral model provides a general framework for performing instance-wise scheduling transformations for regular programs, reordering the iterations of loops that operate over dense arrays through transformations like tiling. There is no analogous framework for recursive programs—despite recent interest in optimizations like tiling and fusion for recursive applications. This paper presents PolyRec, the first general framework for applying scheduling transformations—like inlining, interchange, and code motion—to nested recursive programs and reasoning about their correctness. We describe the phases of PolyRec—representing dynamic instances, applying transformations, reasoning about correctness—and show that PolyRec is able to apply sophisticated, composed transformations to complex, nested recursive programs and improve performance through enhanced locality

    Another approach to the equivalence of measure-many one-way quantum finite automata and its application

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we present a much simpler, direct and elegant approach to the equivalence problem of {\it measure many one-way quantum finite automata} (MM-1QFAs). The approach is essentially generalized from the work of Carlyle [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (1963) 167-175]. Namely, we reduce the equivalence problem of MM-1QFAs to that of two (initial) vectors. As an application of the approach, we utilize it to address the equivalence problem of {\it Enhanced one-way quantum finite automata} (E-1QFAs) introduced by Nayak [Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999, pp.~369-376]. We prove that two E-1QFAs A1\mathcal{A}_1 and A2\mathcal{A}_2 over Σ\Sigma are equivalence if and only if they are n12+n221n_1^2+n_2^2-1-equivalent where n1n_1 and n2n_2 are the numbers of states in A1\mathcal{A}_1 and A2\mathcal{A}_2, respectively.Comment: V 10: Corollary 3 is deleted, since it is folk. (V 9: Revised in terms of the referees's comments) All comments, especially the linguistic comments, are welcom

    On Lindenmayerian algebraic sequences

    Get PDF
    AbstractWe define and study Lindenmayerian algebraic sequences. These sequences are a generalization of algebraic sequences, k-regular sequences and automatic sequences

    Combinatorics of Pisot Substitutions

    Get PDF
    Siirretty Doriast

    Contents

    Get PDF

    From the Closed Classical Algorithmic Universe to an Open World of Algorithmic Constellations

    Get PDF
    This is a draft of the article to be published in Springer book series SAPERE. The final publication will be available a

    Elements of computability, decidability, and complexity (Third edition)

    Get PDF
    These lecture notes are intended to introduce the reader to the basic notions of computability theory, decidability, and complexity. More information on these subjects can be found in classical books such as [Cut80,Dav58,Her69,HoU79,Rog67]. The results reported in these notes are taken from those books and in various parts we closely follow their style of presentation. The reader is encouraged to look at those books for improving his/her knowledge on these topics. Some parts of the chapter on complexity are taken from the lecture notes of a beautiful course given by Prof. Leslie Valiant at Edinburgh University, Scotland, in 1979. It was, indeed, a very stimulating and enjoyable course. For the notions of Predicate Calculus we have used in this book the reader may refer to [Men87]. I would like to thank Dr. Maurizio Proietti at IASI-CNR (Roma, Italy), my colleagues, and my students at the University of Roma Tor Vergata and, in particular, Michele Martone. They have been for me a source of continuous inspiration and enthusiasm. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Gioacchino Onorati and Lorenzo Costantini of the Aracne Publishing Company for their helpful cooperation
    corecore