278 research outputs found
A Normalizing Intuitionistic Set Theory with Inaccessible Sets
We propose a set theory strong enough to interpret powerful type theories
underlying proof assistants such as LEGO and also possibly Coq, which at the
same time enables program extraction from its constructive proofs. For this
purpose, we axiomatize an impredicative constructive version of
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory IZF with Replacement and -many
inaccessibles, which we call \izfio. Our axiomatization utilizes set terms, an
inductive definition of inaccessible sets and the mutually recursive nature of
equality and membership relations. It allows us to define a weakly-normalizing
typed lambda calculus corresponding to proofs in \izfio according to the
Curry-Howard isomorphism principle. We use realizability to prove the
normalization theorem, which provides a basis for program extraction
capability.Comment: To be published in Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Recommended from our members
ISABELLE - THE NEXT 700 THEOREM PROVERS
Isabelle is a generic theorem prover, designed for interactive reasoning in a
variety of formal theories. At present it provides useful proof procedures for
Constructive Type Theory, various first-order logics, Zermelo-Fraenkel set
theory, and higher-order logic. This survey of Isabelle serves as an
introduction to the literature. It explains why generic theorem proving is
beneficial. It gives a thorough history of Isabelle, beginning with its origins
in the LCF system. It presents an account of how logics are represented,
illustrated using classical logic. The approach is compared with the Edinburgh
Logical Framework. Several of the Isabelle object-logics are presented
Normalization of IZF with Replacement
ZF is a well investigated impredicative constructive version of
Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. Using set terms, we axiomatize IZF with
Replacement, which we call \izfr, along with its intensional counterpart
\iizfr. We define a typed lambda calculus \li corresponding to proofs in
\iizfr according to the Curry-Howard isomorphism principle. Using realizability
for \iizfr, we show weak normalization of \li. We use normalization to prove
the disjunction, numerical existence and term existence properties. An inner
extensional model is used to show these properties, along with the set
existence property, for full, extensional \izfr
Ordinal analysis and the set existence property for intuitionistic set theories.
On account of being governed by constructive logic, intuitionistic theories T often enjoy various existence properties. The most common is the numerical existence property (NEP). It entails that an existential theorem of T of the form (∃x∈N)A(x) can be witnessed by a numeral n¯ such that T proves A(n¯). While NEP holds almost universally for natural intuitionistic set theories, the general existence property (EP), i.e. the property of a theory that for every existential theorem, a provably definable witness can be found, is known to fail for some prominent intuitionistic set theories such as Intuitionistic Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (IZF) and constructive Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (CZF). Both of these theories are formalized with collection rather than replacement as the latter is often difficult to apply in an intuitionistic context because of the uniqueness requirement. In light of this, one is clearly tempted to single out collection as the culprit that stymies the EP in such theories. Beeson stated the following open problem: ‘Does any reasonable set theory with collection have the existence property? and added in proof: The problem is still open for IZF with only bounded separation.’ (Beeson. 1985 Foundations of constructive mathematics, p. 203. Berlin, Germany: Springer.) In this article, it is shown that IZF with bounded separation, that is, separation for formulas in which only bounded quantifiers of the forms (∀x∈a),(∃x∈a),(∀x⊆a),(∃x⊆a) are allowed, indeed has the EP. Moreover, it is also shown that CZF with the exponentiation axiom in place of the subset collection axiom has the EP. Crucially, in both cases, the proof involves a detour through ordinal analyses of infinitary systems of intuitionistic set theory, i.e. advanced techniques from proof theory
The scope of Feferman’s semi-intuitionistic set theories and his second conjecture
The paper is concerned with the scope of semi-intuitionistic set theories that relate to various foundational stances. It also provides a proof for a second conjecture of Feferman’s that relates the concepts for which the law of excluded middle obtains to those that are absolute with regard to the relevant test structures, or more precisely of ∆1 complexity. The latter is then used to show that a plethora of statements is indeterminate with respect to various semi-intuitionistic set theories
CZF does not have the Existence Property
Constructive theories usually have interesting metamathematical properties
where explicit witnesses can be extracted from proofs of existential sentences.
For relational theories, probably the most natural of these is the existence
property, EP, sometimes referred to as the set existence property. This states
that whenever (\exists x)\phi(x) is provable, there is a formula \chi(x) such
that (\exists ! x)\phi(x) \wedge \chi(x) is provable. It has been known since
the 80's that EP holds for some intuitionistic set theories and yet fails for
IZF. Despite this, it has remained open until now whether EP holds for the most
well known constructive set theory, CZF. In this paper we show that EP fails
for CZF
- …