11,770 research outputs found
The Cost of Stability in Coalitional Games
A key question in cooperative game theory is that of coalitional stability,
usually captured by the notion of the \emph{core}--the set of outcomes such
that no subgroup of players has an incentive to deviate. However, some
coalitional games have empty cores, and any outcome in such a game is unstable.
In this paper, we investigate the possibility of stabilizing a coalitional
game by using external payments. We consider a scenario where an external
party, which is interested in having the players work together, offers a
supplemental payment to the grand coalition (or, more generally, a particular
coalition structure). This payment is conditional on players not deviating from
their coalition(s). The sum of this payment plus the actual gains of the
coalition(s) may then be divided among the agents so as to promote stability.
We define the \emph{cost of stability (CoS)} as the minimal external payment
that stabilizes the game.
We provide general bounds on the cost of stability in several classes of
games, and explore its algorithmic properties. To develop a better intuition
for the concepts we introduce, we provide a detailed algorithmic study of the
cost of stability in weighted voting games, a simple but expressive class of
games which can model decision-making in political bodies, and cooperation in
multiagent settings. Finally, we extend our model and results to games with
coalition structures.Comment: 20 pages; will be presented at SAGT'0
Bounds on the Cost of Stabilizing a Cooperative Game
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the AI Access Foundation via the DOI in this record.A key issue in cooperative game theory is coalitional stability, usually captured by the
notion of the core—the set of outcomes that are resistant to group deviations. However,
some coalitional games have empty cores, and any outcome in such a game is unstable. We
investigate the possibility of stabilizing a coalitional game by using subsidies. We consider
scenarios where an external party that is interested in having the players work together
offers a supplemental payment to the grand coalition, or, more generally, a particular coalition
structure. This payment is conditional on players not deviating from this coalition
structure, and may be divided among the players in any way they wish. We define the
cost of stability as the minimum external payment that stabilizes the game. We provide
tight bounds on the cost of stability, both for games where the coalitional values are nonnegative
(profit-sharing games) and for games where the coalitional values are nonpositive
(cost-sharing games), under natural assumptions on the characteristic function, such as
superadditivity, anonymity, or both. We also investigate the relationship between the cost
of stability and several variants of the least core. Finally, we study the computational
complexity of problems related to the cost of stability, with a focus on weighted voting
games.DFGEuropean Science FoundationNRF (Singapore)European Research CouncilHorizon 2020 European Research Infrastructure projectIsrael Science FoundationIsrael Ministry of Science and TechnologyGoogle Inter-University Center for Electronic Markets and AuctionsEuropean Social Fund (European Commission)Calabria Regio
Learning Cooperative Games
This paper explores a PAC (probably approximately correct) learning model in
cooperative games. Specifically, we are given random samples of coalitions
and their values, taken from some unknown cooperative game; can we predict the
values of unseen coalitions? We study the PAC learnability of several
well-known classes of cooperative games, such as network flow games, threshold
task games, and induced subgraph games. We also establish a novel connection
between PAC learnability and core stability: for games that are efficiently
learnable, it is possible to find payoff divisions that are likely to be stable
using a polynomial number of samples.Comment: accepted to IJCAI 201
Bounds for the Nakamura number
The Nakamura number is an appropriate invariant of a simple game to study the
existence of social equilibria and the possibility of cycles. For symmetric
quota games its number can be obtained by an easy formula. For some subclasses
of simple games the corresponding Nakamura number has also been characterized.
However, in general, not much is known about lower and upper bounds depending
of invariants on simple, complete or weighted games. Here, we survey such
results and highlight connections with other game theoretic concepts.Comment: 23 pages, 3 tables; a few more references adde
Cooperative Games with Bounded Dependency Degree
Cooperative games provide a framework to study cooperation among
self-interested agents. They offer a number of solution concepts describing how
the outcome of the cooperation should be shared among the players.
Unfortunately, computational problems associated with many of these solution
concepts tend to be intractable---NP-hard or worse. In this paper, we
incorporate complexity measures recently proposed by Feige and Izsak (2013),
called dependency degree and supermodular degree, into the complexity analysis
of cooperative games. We show that many computational problems for cooperative
games become tractable for games whose dependency degree or supermodular degree
are bounded. In particular, we prove that simple games admit efficient
algorithms for various solution concepts when the supermodular degree is small;
further, we show that computing the Shapley value is always in FPT with respect
to the dependency degree. Finally, we note that, while determining the
dependency among players is computationally hard, there are efficient
algorithms for special classes of games.Comment: 10 pages, full version of accepted AAAI-18 pape
Complexity of coalition structure generation
We revisit the coalition structure generation problem in which the goal is to
partition the players into exhaustive and disjoint coalitions so as to maximize
the social welfare. One of our key results is a general polynomial-time
algorithm to solve the problem for all coalitional games provided that player
types are known and the number of player types is bounded by a constant. As a
corollary, we obtain a polynomial-time algorithm to compute an optimal
partition for weighted voting games with a constant number of weight values and
for coalitional skill games with a constant number of skills. We also consider
well-studied and well-motivated coalitional games defined compactly on
combinatorial domains. For these games, we characterize the complexity of
computing an optimal coalition structure by presenting polynomial-time
algorithms, approximation algorithms, or NP-hardness and inapproximability
lower bounds.Comment: 17 page
- …